Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Who did john adams influence
How was john adams influential
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Miracle at Philadelphia In Philadelphia in1787 during one of the hottest summers, The Constitutional Convention gathered to discuss the fate of the union. Fifty-five delegates met in the Pennsylvania State House. These delegates were representatives from 12 of the 13 new states. Everyone sent representatives, except for the state of Rhode Island. Rhode Island was afraid of the government being too powerful and taking over. They decided to not send representatives so that they would not lose their independence. Only 9 of the 13 states were needed to ratify the Constitution so it was not significant that Rhode Island did not send anyone. In 1790, Rhode Island ultimately becomes the 13th state to ratify the Constitution after Washington had …show more content…
become president. Others who were not in attendance at the convention were Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Samuel Adams, John Hancock and Patrick Henry. At the time, Jefferson travelled to Paris and was serving as minister to France. He was not in agreement of the convention and felt that it was a meeting of the “demigods.” At the same time, John Adams was serving as minister to Great Britain. One of the oldest delegates was Franklin who was in his eighty’s. Most of the other delegates were in their early thirty’s. George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin were some of the more familiar delegates present at the convention. More than half of the delegates were educated judges or lawyers. However, only about a quarter of them had ever practiced law as their profession. Other delegate’s professions or businesses included: merchants, manufacturers, shippers, land speculators, bankers, two or three physicians, a minister, and several small farmers. During this time period some of the representatives owned slaves and the slaves ran their business and/or plantations. The majority of the fifty-five delegates had some integral role in the Revolution. About twenty-nine of them served in the Continental forces. The members of the Confederation and some of the Continental Congress during the Revolution were comprised of about seventy-fiver percent of the delegates at the Convention. The variety of the men that made up the delegates came from different backgrounds and professions; however their end goal was the same. With the fate of the union in their hands, they gathered to work together and compromise to reach their goals. Madison was the principle author of the Constitution and gained the title “The Father of the Constitution” by many. He earned this title because of the strong leadership and dedication he showed during the planning stages and writing of the Constitution. The construction of the Constitution was a foreshadowing of how great America would become. Madison presented an outline of a new government at the Federal Convention in May of 1787. Eventually, this became known as the Virginia Plan and it was a framework for counterproposals and compromises. Madison played a fundamental role in the document’s drafting and ratification and the title “The Father of the Constitution” was well earned. Madison co-authored a series of essays known as the Federalist Papers with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. The essays influenced debates on ratification and Madison was able to get two-thirds approval for ratification from the thirteen states. This approval allowed for the Constitution to become the law. Madison was in accordance with the Constitution and knew it could be even better. By introducing the Bill of Rights, which was the first amendments to the Constitution, Madison made the Constitution even stronger. These amendments guaranteed individual rights as citizens, such as the freedom of speech, religion and the press. Madison was very humble when it came to acknowledging his contributions to the Constitution and stated, “You give me a credit to which I have no claim in calling me ‘The writer of the Constitution of the U.S.’ This was not, like the fabled Goddess of Wisdom, the offspring of a single brain. It ought to be regarded as the work of many heads and many hands” (onstitutionday.com 2013). Even though Madison showed modesty and gave credit to others for their contributions, he still is referred to as “The Father of the Constitution.” In addition to Washington, Franklin and Madison, John Rutledge was one of the most productive convention members. At the Constitutional Convention, he was chosen to be the representative for South Carolina. He was chosen as the Chair of the Committee of Detail and had the responsibility of writing the first draft of the Constitution. He was very committed, was on five committees and attended all sessions of the convention. In his speeches he spoke of the people of the south and their interests. He gave debates on the Virginia Plan which led to him using what was in the original plan to produce the first draft of the Constitution. The final rendering of the United States Constitution included a great deal of what was in the initial draft. John Rutledge’s signature can also be seen on the official document of the Constitution. A proposal of the Virginia Plan was to create a government that included three branches of government: the legislative, the executive and the judicial branch. These branches would replace the Articles of Confederation. Rutledge stood in support of a stronger government; however he was not in support of slavery. Because the smaller states did not have a lot of power or support, the New Jersey Plan was created. This new plan would speak for and support the interests of the smaller states. John Rutledge had another world changing idea. He proposed that the election of the president should be from the two houses of Congress or what is known as a joint ballot. In the end it was decided that the House of Representative would have the final selection. Rutledge was first and foremost a federalist, yet sometimes he crossed party lines. He was the first Governor of South Carolina and was in attendance at the South Carolina convention to support the ratification of the Constitution. Along with Washington, Madison, and Franklin, another productive member of the Constitutional Convention was Roger Sherman.
Chosen to represent Connecticut at the Constitutional Convention, Sherman brought a proposition that would be named the Connecticut Compromise. He wanted to merge the Virginia Plan and New Jersey plan thus, combining major components of both plans. Sherman suggested a two-house national legislature. The Connecticut Compromise outlined the governmental structure that exists still today. The House of Representatives would have representation based on population. The Senate would have equal representation for each state. Even though the compromise was rejected the first time around, finally on July 23 it was passed. Ultimately this great compromise saved the entire convention from termination. Sherman was the only person to have his signature on four eminent papers of the United States. They were the Continental Association, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. Sherman also designed the thee-fifths compromise. It was constructed because of the argument that slaves should be included in taxation, yet not in representation. Sherman, along with James Wilson, created the three-fifths compromise which stated that the government would count slave only as partial people. Meaning each slave would count as “three fifths of all other persons.” The goal was to abolish slavery in all states. By creating the three-fifths …show more content…
compromise, Sherman and Wilson hoped to encourage more states to support the ratification of the constitution. Sherman was very vocal and spoke at many conventions in support of smaller stated. He is also notably remembered for giving 138 speeches at a variety of conventions. Bowen characterizes the founding fathers as holding such an elevated place in American history.
It is often difficult to imagine them as everyday people. The United States Constitution was the first written constitution in the world during a time of great division among the states. Even George Washington used the word miracle in describing the drafting of the U.S. Constitution. In a letter to Lafayette, he said: “It appears to me, then, little short of a miracle, that the delegates from so many different states (which states you know are also different from each other in their manners, circumstances, and prejudices) should unite in forming a system of national Government, so little liable to well-founded objections.” (Oaks
1992). Even Washington knew how divided the states were on so many fundamental issues. It was and is a miracle that so many delegates could set aside their prejudices and differences and realize that the country was in an alarmingly weak state. They had won independence from a king and the delegates had the unique opportunity of establishing a constitutional government. The actual written word of the constitution resembles that of scripture. It speaks of freedom of speech and religion and life, liberty and equality to all men. This parallels God’s free will and grace given to all. God created all people equal and gave them freedom of choice. All human beings are responsible for their own choices and the consequences that come from those choices. The constitution was written on this same premise. This can be seen even in the preamble, “We, the people of the United States … do ordain and establish this Constitution.” The constitution was written by the people and for the people. Everyone has the free will to choose to follow the law (constitution). Life, liberty and justice for all is a blessing bestowed upon man from the constitution and instituted by God. Did Washington or the Founding Fathers ever imagine that the U.S. Constitution would become a model for other nations after two centuries – that is a miracle. It has been in place for more than two hundred years and has given America and its people great freedom and prosperity. Works Cited Bowen, Catherine Drinker. Miracle at Philadelphia: The Story of the Constitutional Convention, May to September, 1787. Boston: Little, Brown, 1986. Print. "Constitutional Convention." James Madison's Montepelier. Montepelier Foundation, 2007-2014. Web. 20 Aug. 2014. Oaks. "The Divinely Inspired Constitution - Ensign Feb. 1992 - Ensign." The
After America was recognized as an independent country from England, the new republic went through almost twenty years worth of trial and error to find a government that would satisfy the needs of the citizens, the states, and the central national government. The most memorable, and influential, action of this time would have to be the Connecticut Compromise, proposed Roger Sherman, following the proposal of the Large and Small State plans at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This Compromise directly affected the amount of representation from each state, and created the government system we are familiar with today.
...However the large states were not satisfied with their plan either, so a third plan was made, The Great Compromise. In other words the Connecticut Compromise (The Great Compromise) happened, it mixed the ideas of the two and was passed by a one-vote margin. The plan consists of proportional representation in The House of Representatives and equal representation in The Senate, as well as adding separation of powers to the mix. It was highly important and crucial to the success of the new constitution.
The responsibilities would include managing debt, creating national monetary and fiscal policies, as well as managing the national tensions that lead to crisis. Men like Alexander Hamilton, George Washington and John Adams, were in favor of the Constitution, supported the Bill of Rights and subsequently, a larger more powerful federal government. In their views for support of a federal government they proposed the Constitution and later added the first ten amendments that make up the Bill of Rights (Lecture). While framing the Constitution issues taken into consideration were states boundaries, representation quotas and veto rights (Countryman 172). Two main plans were proposed to solve the plethora of issues facing the country – one by James Madison and one by Patterson. The fundamental differences was where the federal government derived their power. Patterson advocated for the federal to obtain their power from the states rather than the people, whereas Madison advocated for the power of the centralized government owing its power directly to the people (Countryman 178). After years back and forth conversations, a three tiered system was created that would ensure the integrity of the system by separation and complete independence from each other, thus listing specified duties and power allotted to the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary powers of the United States
When the Founding Fathers got together at Philadelphia to draft the Constitution, they had many different views and opinions as to how to govern our country. At the convention, the founders fought over the issues of slavery, representation and the Congress’s powers. Their personal lives had influenced their ideas and some of the compromises made at the Constitutional Convention. The founders’ different personal experiences, economic backgrounds, and coming from states of different sizes, economy and needs, led to the creation of the Three-Fifths Compromise, The Great Compromise, and the Slave Trade Compromise.
One agreement the Constitution consisted of was the three-fifths Compromise. Foner states that the Constitution did not allow the national government to meddle with slavery in the states. This meant that three out of every five slaves could be counted as part of the state 's population. The powerpoint mentions that this raised their representation in the House of Representatives. The congress could not mess with the slave trade until
The delegates, also known as the Framers of the Constitution, didn't exactly agree on how to create a new system of government, with two sides emerging both with contrary, but comparable motives on how to keep their country running efficiently. First there were the Federalists, who favored a stronger national g...
The Articles of Confederation was America’s first constitution. The Articles of Confederation failed to create a strong central government, however. With the demise of the states in sight, the need for a stronger and more structured central government became apparent. An invitation was sent to all thirteen states in February 1787 by the Confederation Congress to resolve the matter. The events that took place over the next several months would create the United States Constitution. Going down in history as a revolutionary form of government, the U.S. Constitution would give life to a country that is still running strong over 200 years later.
On May 25, 1787 in a State House in Philadelphia, fifty-five delegates from twelve out of the thirteen colonies re-united, in efforts to modify the ineffective Articles of Confederation. This meeting was called the Continental Convention of 1787. After the Articles of Confederation, it was clear that a unicameral legislature was not going to uphold the needs of all the states, to maintain and unify them. Many ideas arose to offer a solution for the controversial debate on how many representatives each state should have in the U.S. Congress. The ...
Therefore, in 1787, two delegates by the names of Roger Sherman and James Wilson introduced the Three Fifths compromise in the Philadelphia Convention. The Three Fifths compromise states that a slave be counted as three-fifths of a person. Therefore, the population of the southern states equaled the population of the northern states. Now that the populations were balanced, the south and the north sent the same amount of representatives to The House of Representatives. Pro-slavery southerners felt as if the north still had an advantage, but it was actually the south that had the advantage in the Senate and The House of Rep...
These compromises are found in four main places within the Constitution. The first is the three-fifths compromise, which detailed how slaves would influence the population of each state for the purpose of determining representation and taxation. Located in Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution the compromise states that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for enumeration purposes (Dolbeare, 71). This compromise was important for the Southern states, whose populations consisted of large numbers of slaves, because without it they would have a significant smaller number of representatives in the House. Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution prohibit...
Continuing the metaphor of faction as a disease, Madison labels “[a] republic” as “the cure for which we are seeking”. Madison notes that a republican government differs from pure democracy in that the delegation of the government is smaller and can thus achieve efficient action. Another contrast lies also in the extent to which a republic has influence over a “greater sphere of country”. The passing of public views “through the medium of a chosen body of citizens” allows for refinement of ideas due to the influence of elected officials’ wisdom and is “more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves”. To protect against the caprices of wicked men, the number of representatives of the people will be a quantity that stymies the influence of the few but is able to, as Madison states, “guard against the confusion of a multitude”. Madison then references his belief in the common sense and good will of men in that “the suffrages of the people” is likely to result in the election of men most deserving and fit for their roles as representatives and lawmakers. Madison presents an avowal that counters one of the Anti-Federalists’ major grievances: “[t]he federal Constitution forms a happy combination” with “the great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures”; Anti-Federalists feared that a stronger
The next step of the convention was more democratic, in that there were delegates sent to Philadelphia by the state legislatures (Roche 18). Since the legislatures were chosen by elections in the states, the delegates to the convention were indirectly chosen by the people. Rhode Island did not send delegates, but there was an opportunity for them to do so. They decided against sending anyone since they knew they would not be welcomed by the convention.
In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.
The Great Compromise, is also referred to as, The Great Connecticut Compromise, was headed by Franklin. The Compromise was discussed in meeting by a committee, at the constitutional convention was held in 1787. This was to accomplish and settle the interests for both the small and large states. It had allowed the for one to lead in the senate and the other in the House by an arrangement, that each of the states would have two representatives in the Senate no matter what the size of the state. However, any provisions, were further granted based on the populace of the house (Wilson, Dilulio, Jr. and Bose, 23).
The constitution is the cornerstone to how the U.S. operates legally, unfortunately many times the government attempts to find loopholes and skirt around these pillars of America. An easy example is the 4th amendment, “protection from unreasonable searches and seizures”.