Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of police in law enforcement
Law enforcement roles and responsibilities
Issues dealing with criminal investigations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of police in law enforcement
Police Interrogation Tactics
A confession at any cost In the United States, law enforcement officers are infamously known for violating average citizen’s constitutional rights in order to get a confession. Instead of being innocent ‘til proven guilty, the roles are actually swapped. The minute you are booked for an alleged crime you may have committed, your chances of walking away are slim. But is this actually feasible? Is the law enforcement that is supposedly there to protect us, in reality harming us?
Imagine you are at home watching the local news. You see the police searching for a robber that is your doppelganger. Your neighbor, John, whose window was broken by your son’s baseball sees this same report, decides to call the police to report that the suspect is his neighbor and is currently home. The police come, and arrest you on reasonable suspicion. The commissioner of the task force has been hassling the department for months to catch this guy, and if they can’t get the confession, they are off the case.
Terrified of your predicament, worried about your family, and no one answering any of your questions, you start feeling a panic attack come on. As you are about to go insane for the never ending silence, finally the detective
…show more content…
In fact, the minute they bring someone in on reasonable suspicion, there is an 80% chances of the suspect being the guilty party. Therefore, beyond reasonable doubt a blurred line is established. Detectives have evidence to bring in the suspect, getting them to confess becomes the mission of the case. Whether or not they are innocent or guilty doesn’t matter, for chances are their suspect is in fact guilty. And the faster they book someone, the better their arrest record gets, and the further they can advance their career. If it means overlook some information and just aim to get the confession, to pull an arrest, it will
Stop and frisk is a brief, non-intrusive, police stop of a suspicious individual. The Fourth Amendment entails that the police have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, or is in progress before stopping a suspect. If the officer realistically is certain that the person is carrying a weapon and is dangerous, the officers can conduct a search, a rapid pat down of the suspect’s exterior clothing. A law enforcement officer may stop and briefly detain a person for investigatory purposes if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts of impending criminal activity. Reasonable suspicion is less demanding than probable cause, less quantity of evidence or information is needed. Reasonable suspicion can come from information less reliable than needed for probable cause.
In more extreme cases, officers may obstruct justice and lie under the oath to save themselves or a fellow officer from discipline and prosecution (Holbert & Rosa 69). Despite police not taking fault in their actions and going against the oath, it gives government official a bad reputation in the moto of protecting and serving their
Depending on what study is read, the incidence of false confession is less than 35 per year, up to 600 per year. That is a significant variance in range, but no matter how it is evaluated or what numbers are calculated, the fact remains that false confessions are a reality. Why would an innocent person confess to a crime that she did not commit? Are personal factors, such as age, education, and mental state, the primary reason for a suspect to confess? Are law enforcement officers and their interrogation techniques to blame for eliciting false confessions? Regardless of the stimuli that lead to false confessions, society and the justice system need to find a solution to prevent the subsequent aftermath.
America as a people gloat when it comes to our freedoms we think we have it better than every other country out there but the protectors of our freedom are becoming fear and hated because of the injustices committed by certain officers. Some say life of an officer is hard because they do not know if they will ever see their family again after they drive out of their house in the morning, others might say every officer knows what they were signing up for so they should not be pitied. Police officers face dangers everyday but profiling and racially motivated brutality is not justifiable and officers should be severely punished for committing these crimes.
In situations when a high profile case is public, police investigators undergo amounts of severe pressure to convict a suspect and is often led to convict the first suspect who is involved. Pressure from victims, the community, media and police supervisors often induce speed as the overriding factor when investigating a case. Police officers have human tendencies when trying to reach the overall goal of justice when solving a case. Tunnel vision is often the result of police officers having a narrow theory towards a suspect, drawn to conclusions about who is responsible early and disregarding evidence that points to the suspect as innocent.
Now, to the layman, that appears simply to be a frame up – when you arrest and charge and find the evidence subsequently. To make matters worse, when we examine the manner in which that evidence was put forward by the prosecution (a matter for which the director of Public Prosecutions must be held responsible), we find some startling inconsistencies, strange and frightening things. Like one man giving three statements. – two of them before Arnold Rampersaud was arrested, never mentioning the accused or anything to do with the accused. A third statement made after he had been arrested conveniently mentions the accused.
For decades, gun violence had been an extreme debated problem in the US. Over the past 200 years almost every day, the United States has more gun deaths from accidental or unintentional. Every time a firearms incident led to a tragic death, American politics and public debates over gun laws took place. However, there the voices of the people against guns were too little compared with the numerous supporters of gun. In fact, with 310 million guns in circulation in the market, the United States is one of the countries most used weapons in the world. One of the concrete actions has been taken to restrict guns and crime is stop and frisk program in New York City. But after several years of implementation, it has faced a lot of opposition from the
Law enforcement in the United States is being perceived as a dangerous, toxic force that cannot be trusted by society. People used to trust law enforcement and come to them in a time of need for protection or help. Media has pointed out only a few corrupt people in authority abusing their power, creating fear in the public’s eye. Although these concerns are spreading throughout the nation, New Mexico is also worried as well. In order to possibly solve this issue, New Mexicans need to show more respect for law enforcement officers because most of them are not practicing racism, abusing power, or using unnecessary violent force. Society has created this image of police officers as these monsters that are in fact practicing racism, abusing their
I believe officers in law enforcement are here to serve and protect the citizens of this country. Although as I stated before I also believe that there are still a few that are bad. The majority of them are good. For any kind of change to begin a number of factors need to be involved. The citizens need to use fairness.
When a prosecutor is deciding whether a case should be prosecuted in the courts and charges should be filed against someone, prosecutors consider two important questions: Is it in the best interest of the public to proceed? And, is there a strong reasonable likelihood that there will be a conviction? If the answer to both are yes, then there is the task of deciding whether there is enough evidence to prosecute the case and whether the evidence is reliable and can it be used in court. This means carefully assessing the quality of the evidence from all related witnesses before reaching a final decision.
Law enforcement officers have the power to conduct investigations, make an arrests, and perform searches and seizures of persons and their belongings. When police officers exceed this boundaries of the law, they jeopardize the evidence collected for prosecution.
In our times, the police have become the criminals. Some police are using their power to do bad things, and society has come to fear police. The law enforcement system needs change. The courts have failed the police, and the police have turn to other means of justice. We must stop the corruption in the police force.
In some cities, there are community service programs that allow officers to refer offender instead of using the arrest option. This may result in private matters where the officer refers a couple to counseling. Depending on the situation and the nature of the offense, an officer may decide providing a ticket or an arrest is more appropriate. In light of this, one of the most important advantages is it provides officer a chance to give people a second change and treat people with dignity, which in turn, increases public perception that the police are fair. If the police were to follow the law in every detail, the criminal justice system would be even more overcrowded than it is already. Although, discretion is controlled in most situations, the discretionary powers they do hold allow officer to feel as though they are making a difference when they can decide what would be the most positive and fair outcome in minor offenses. On the other hand, when used improperly, it results in unethical and discriminatory practices. Police officers are held to very high standard and ethics, and are not above the law or have the right to abuse the rights of
There is a one in two chance that the guilty person will give alibi evidence
The prosecutor and criminal investigator square measure 2 cogs that have to work along to achieve success in making an attempt a criminal case. The prosecutor should swear upon the investigator to tell them of all aspects of the case that they designed, and the investigator must accept the functionary to achieve justice for the victim, their family, and the community. Any criminal trial is an adversarial match between the functionary and the defense and facets either side can use all the data on the market to them to induce a win for his or her side.