When a prosecutor is deciding whether a case should be prosecuted in the courts and charges should be filed against someone, prosecutors consider two important questions: Is it in the best interest of the public to proceed? And, is there a strong reasonable likelihood that there will be a conviction? If the answer to both are yes, then there is the task of deciding whether there is enough evidence to prosecute the case and whether the evidence is reliable and can it be used in court. This means carefully assessing the quality of the evidence from all related witnesses before reaching a final decision.
Grand jury indictments will be presented by the prosecutors only when and if a criminal case has not been diverted, downgraded, or dismissed. In order to compose a Grand jury citizens are selected from tax lists drivers license and voters registrations. In order to formally charge a person accused of a crime a prosecutor’s evidence is evaluated by a Grand jury to determine if that evidence is enough to support the prosecutor’s decision. Many states utilize grand jury’s to proceed with criminal and federal investigations, these investigations play an important role in the criminal process working hand in hand with prosecutors to decide on whether the evidence that has been presented is enough to charge or indict a person. “Grand juries are typically made up of 16 to 23 people and every felony case must be indicted by a grand jury unless waived by the accused. The purpose of the grand jury is not to determine guilt or innocence, but to decide whether there is probable cause to prosecute someone for a felony crime. The grand jury operates in secrecy and the normal rules of evidence do not apply. The prosecutor runs the ...
... middle of paper ...
...s important. Such situations allow criminals to be released back into society much too soon. The ultimate goal of the prosecutor should be to work cases that have enough evidence to establish every element of the crime in order to gain a successful conviction.
References
Chamblis, W.J. (1969). Crime and the legal process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Glaberson, William (2004, June 20). New Trend Before Grand Juries: Meet the Accused. The
New York Times. Retrieved April 7, 2014 from http://www.nytimes.com
http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/JuryService/about-jury-service.aspx
Heumann, Milton (1981). The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys.
University of Chicago Press
Wright, R. (2013). Introduction to criminal law and procedure. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint
Education, Inc.
What the Grand Jury does is rather simple, but a very necessary feature of the American court process. The purpose of the Grand Jury is “to determine whether there is enough evidence for the case to proceed to trial” (Miller, 2015). It makes perfect sense as to why the director of the film did not include this process, due to the fact that during the Grand Jury process, all of the evidence against the defendants gets presented to the judge (Miller, 2015). If the director were to present this as a scene in the movie, there would be no surprise as to what the prosecutor would produce as evidence, which for the film, would make it less suspenseful. This leads us into the next step, and that is the Discovery Process. In the movie, Vinny believes that he seduced Jim Trotter to give him his files on the case. Vinny was surprised at how easily he received the documents,until his fiancé (Mona Lisa Vito) tells him that the prosecutor had to share them with him, and this is part of the discovery process. The prosecution is legally bound to share its information with the defense.
Attorney, it’s important to ensure the protection of the victims and to punish the delinquents for
Prosecutorial misconduct is when a prosecutor wrongfully convicts a defendant based on information he or she may keep concealed from a judge and/or jury. Ask the average citizen, and they are totally unaware that such a thing ever happens. The public is often persuaded to believe that all prosecutors are honorable people who are committed to ethics, justice, and upholding the law. But prosecutorial misconduct and misdeeds happen, and they occur more frequently than anyone would imagine. Judge Konzinski, stated to the Washington Post, “Prosecutorial misconduct is a particularly difficult problem to deal with because so much of what prosecutors do is secret. If a prosecutor fails to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense, who is to know? Or if a prosecutor delays disclosure of evidence helpful to the defense until the defendant has accepted an unfavorable plea bargain, no one will be the wiser.” No wonder society is naive to the prosecutorial misconduct that transpire
Grand jury law-"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise, infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury". Grand jury is a group that examines accusations against persons charged with a crime, the grand jury does not decide guilt or innocence. Its function is inquisitorial and accusatorial. Standard court trial juries are normally 6 or 12people, yet in the government framework, a fantastic jury can be 16 to 23 individuals. There is no judge display and as often as possible there are no legal advisors aside from the prosecutor. The prosecutor will disclose the law to the jury and work with them to assemble confirm and hear declaration completely implies that crafted by the excellent jury isn't made receivable to the general population or, in most cases, to the respondent or defendant. Only an Assistant of United States Attorney and a stenographer meet with the grand jurors and plus those witnesses who are subpoenaed to give proof. under typical court guidelines of confirmation, displays and other declaration must follow excessively strict standards previously affirmation. The Grand Jury is superior to the preliminary hearing system in that the evidence is heard in camera and without undue influence. In most cases when the police arrest someone for a
The attorney’s office of the prosecutor is usually the one’s who decide whether charges should
There is a system of codes and tests set up to ensure that the law is properly applied known as The Code of Crown Prosecutors and The Full Code Test, issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions. It consists of The Pace Codes, and two stages of The Full Code Test called The Evidential and Credible Test, and The Public Test. The Evidential test is the first stage in deciding whether to prosecute or not. The prosecutors ensure that the right person is prosecuted for the right offence and that offenders are brought to justice wherever possible. Their decision is based on whether there is realistic prospect of conviction by considering the availability (witness available), admissibility and reliability...
After a person suspected of murder has been the trial process begin. During this stage the police will give the evidence they have complied to the prosecution. The prosecution will make a determi...
Therefore, under these ethical standards, prosecutors cannot file charges if there is not enough evidence to support a conviction, they also do not file if it is not in the public interest to do so. This is what makes the possibilities limitless; however, three key factors also play a part in determining which cases to prosecute. If prosecutors follow these three factors in determining cases then the contradiction of limitless discretion and high ethical standards should be remedied for others. These are factors that should be followed are as followed: the seriousness and nature of the offense, the offender’s culpability, and the likelihood of being able to obtain a conviction at a trial. “Ethical conduct, then, must be the core of the prosecutor’s role in the criminal justice system” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). Therefore, even though prosecutors have almost limitless discretion in their decisions, they still must
Prosecutors, without doubt, are the most powerful and influential decision makers in the criminal justice system. The decisions they make on who will be charged with a crime or whether to accept a case at all, which charges to file, and various other vital decisions. When it comes to making these decisions, prosecutors possess the power to exercise their discretion at their choice without many limitations. Prosecutors, without doubt, are the most powerful and influential decision makers in the criminal justice system. The decisions they make on who will be charged with a crime or whether to accept a case at all, which charges to file, and various other vital decisions. When it comes to making these decisions, prosecutors possess the power to exercise their discretion at their choice without many limitations. In some cases, determining between life and death. While it is important that an individual in a position that has vast knowledge of the criminal justice system, such as a prosecutor, be able to make these decisions without bias or malicious intent. I do believe that too much of that
Forensic evidence can provide just outcomes in criminal matters. However, it is not yet an exact science as it can be flawed. It can be misrepresented through the reliability of the evidence, through nonstandard guidelines, and through public perception. Forensic science can be dangerously faulty without focus on the ‘science’ aspect. It can at times be just matching patterns based on an individual’s interpretations. This can lead to a miscarriage of justice and forever alter a person’s life due to a perceived “grey area” (Merritt C, 2010) resulting in a loss of confidence in the reliability of forensic evidence.
In contrast, grand juries are larger than petit juries and consist of 16 to 23 citizens. The purpose of a grand jury is to determine if there is probable cause to believe the individual has committed a crime and should proceed to trial (“Types of juries”, 2017) and are not public. In accordance with the Fifth Amendment, no individual shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise notorious crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury and is assured for certain offenses (Worrall,
I selected the state of Minnesota as one of many other states that use the grand jury. The rules of criminal procedure require grand juries for any crime punishable by life in prison, serious crimes (first-degrees) are life, not just premeditated; with or without parole is the difference and certain first-degree sex crimes. The state can submit other cases for public policy such as cases where a police officer causes a death while in the line of duty. All crimes punishable by life imprisonment or any homicide case where the prosecutor announces his or her intent to present to a grand jury must start within fourteen days of the defendant’s first court appearance. The use of grand juries in all other cases is optional or up to the discretion
The prosecutor plays the most critical role in the criminal justice process before, during and after a trial. The prosecutor is involved in investigations, plea bargains, deciding the nature of the charges, and recommending sentences. Although it is not always the case, the main purpose of the prosecutor is to seek justice not to convict. They serve many functions
Prosecutors, for many years, are empowered with making decisions about who to prosecute, how many years the defendant could get, who gets a plea deal, and who does not.
The three conditions that must be met in order for a prosecutor to charge a person with a crime or crimes is has a crime been committed, has a perpetrator been identified, and is there enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in order to get a guilty verdict. A prosecutor has complete autonomy on deciding to prosecute a person. The prosecutor is the “most powerful actor in the administration of justice” (Bohm & Haley, 2011, p. 284).