Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of emotions on decision-making
The impact of emotions on decision-making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Brutus and Cassius both had the same thoughts above Caesar becoming a tyrant, but did they overreact in this assumption that Caesar could go crazy and be overtaking with power? In my opinion, yes, they did overreact. They had no idea what could have happened if he became king of Rome. These are just a few points of Brutus and Cassius reacting very irrationally. Both Brutus and Cassius came up with their “evidence” on their own. They had no proof of what would have happened if he were crowned as king. Based off of only their own experience caused them to make such rash decisions. If they were to talk between other people about this issue, then maybe they would not make decisions like killing Caesar. There were many other solutions to this situation besides killing Caesar, this is an obvious example of how they overreacted. They could have spent more time planning a well thought out plan to prevent Caesar from becoming king. They could have talked him out of becoming king with flattery, since he is easily persuaded. …show more content…
He planned everything almost on his own and Cassius just went along with it. Even though Brutus is mostly held responsible for what happened, Cassius was also in on it too. They should have had someone legally experienced for this kind of thing. I think this would have changed the outcome in a very positive way. The death of Caesar was for the sake of Rome, but did Brutus put his country’s needs before his own? This may be caused by Brutus’ lack of knowledge about his thought of Caesar becoming king. He is manipulated himself into thinking Caesar will become a tyrant and be the downfall of
The Conspirators did not even wait to see if Caesar would become the evil dictator they believed would come out of him. They moved too fast with their actions and did not give Caesar the opportunity to be a possibly great leader of Rome. Without proof and evidence of these things they
Summary opinion: Cassius is guilty of extenuating circumstances. He is overwhelmingly jealous of Caesar’s popularity and believes he must stop it by convincing Brutus to join his side. He does so by sending fake letters and speaking about the dictatorship of Caesar. His actions played the most prominent role in the cause of Caesar’s death. Facts: “Ye gods, it doth amaze me a man of such feeble temper should so get the start of the majestic world and bear the palm alone.
themselves. Brutus felt that the death of Caesar would be the end of the absolute rule that
Brutus thinks that killing Caesar is a noble act because it is for the good of Rome. However would Brutus have thought this if Cassius had not tricked him into believing it? It could be argued that Brutus manipulated himself into thinking what he did was honorable when really it was not and he was just following what Cassius wanted him to do. Brutus even says in the beginning of the play that he does not have it in him to kill Caesar. “Into what dangers would you lead me, Cassius/ That you would have me seek into myself/ For that which is not in me?” (1.2.60-71) It seems that Brutus’s thoughts on the subject change completely after assuring himself that it is for the good of Rome. Cassius does the same thing. He convinces himself that Caesar is corrupt when really he is just jealous of his power. Caesar is also guilty of this. For example, he is superstitious only when it is convenient for him. He does not believe the soothsayer when he tells him to “beware the ides of March,”(citation?) but he believes Decius when he says that Calpurnia’s dream means he will be a good ruler. Caesar does not want to accept that he could be in danger. He trains himself to only believe in good omens.
Basically Caesar had many people disagree with his actions so they assassinated him.
Both Caesar and Brutus have a tragic flaw. In the beginning of the play a soothsayer is telling Caesar to beware the ides of march Caesar Responds “He is a dreamer; Brutus leave him. Pass” (shakespeare page??? line????) When Caesar tells the soothsayer this it shows that he does not believe that he could be harmed. Just like caesar, Brutus suffered a tragic flaw, his being trusting everyone. After Caesar is dead Antony wants to say a speech at Caesar 's funeral, after making the crowd violent says “Now let it work. Mischief, thou art afoot, take thou the course thou wilt.”(shakespeare3.2.266-264). Brutus trusted Antony to say some nice words about Caesar, instead he turn the crowd violent. Caesar and Brutus love the roman people and would sacrifice anything for them. after Caesar dies Antony reads “ to every roman citizen he gives, to every several man, seventy-five drachmas”( page lines title). Caesar loved the romans so much he gave them all a bit of his money after he died. Even though he was prideful he loved the romans as much as Brutus. Brutus saw that under Caesar 's rule romans were suffering and says” Not that i love Caesar less, but that I loved/Rome more”(?) He Explains why he felt
Caesar should not be assassinated by the conspirators because they had personal reasons for hating him. Firstly, ...
...thing else. The threat that Caesar poses was that he would begin moving away from the idea of a Roman republic and towards an Empire ruled directly by him. Brutus is complex because he does not kill Caesar for greed, envy, or to preserve his social position like so many of the other conspirators against Caesar, he does it for the good of the people. Once Brutus has made up his mind he sticks to it, and he is rarely questioned. Brutus is very accustomed to having his way without argument, which explains why he rarely listens to anyone else.
Throughout most of the play Brutus is constantly internally conflicted. Does he do what he believes is best for Rome or stay loyal to his friend and leader? Should he assist in the murder of one person to benefit many? Although killing Caesar was in the end a bad choice, Brutus always tries to do what is best for Rome and for the people. However even though all of Brutus’ motives are good he still has the tragic flaw of pride, which ultimately leads to his downfall. The reason that Brutus gets caught up in the conspiracy is because Cassias appeals to his pride and flatters him with forged letters from the Roman people saying he is a greater leader then Caesar.
Caesar could just turn around and kill them all. Brutus will have to live his life in fear Caesar would find out that he plotted against him. Brutus would not be the only person to be hunted by Caesar then. So by taking out Ceaser they all will be able to live a more peaceful and safer life. What would happen if Caesar is king?
In my opinion, I totally agree with Brutus with the fact that something needed to be done regarding the issue of Caesar becoming king. Although I think that planning to kill him wasn’t the best way to go about it. I believe that there must have been a more civilized way to deal
Brutus thinks Caesar will become a tyrant and he worries about the safety of the citizens. In order to have a conceptual justification, Brutus relates Caesar to a poisonous snake meaning if Caesar becomes the leader of Rome he will be venomous and he could lose his humanity by gaining too much right. Caesar might lose his sympathy with the citizens and he would only control them and enslave them. Just like a venomous snake, Caesar can be a danger as soon as he gets the
The conspiracy in the play ¨Julius Caesar¨ has 8 conspirators is which they stabbed Caesar to his death when he was going to be crowned king. If the conspiracy had not done this the
The senators believe that anything they do to Caesar will look bad in the eyes of the people, but Brutus, whom the plebeians love, will make their actions appear honorable. In order to achieve this, Cassius creates a plan in order to prod Brutus in favor of the assassination: In several hands, in at his windows throw, As if they came from several citizens, Writings all tending to the great opinion That Rome holds in his name, and wherein obscurely Caesar’s ambition shall be glanced at. (I,ii,312-316) By deceiving Brutus into believing that the Roman people, who respect him, think that Caesar is becoming too ambitious, Cassius is able to convince Brutus, a noble Roman, to join the plot against Caesar. Because he only wants to do what is best for the people, Brutus joins the conspiracy.
They were losing their freedoms and thought the only way to resolve this problem was to kill Caesar. Killing Caesar did not help make the government a democracy like the Senate had wanted. Marcus Brutus and Cassius ended up leaving Rome, so their plot did not help them. Caesar was the leader of Rome, the top of the Roman Empire. The people he thought he could trust most, his so-called friends, took him to the bottom of the Roman Empire, to his grave.