Pros And Cons Of Book Censorship

As of 2018, there have been nearly 130 million books published throughout history. Despite of this, a society may be motivated to destroy all forms of printed material, including books. This would make reading or possessing any book a punishable offense. A society may make this decision to withhold historical information and certain thoughts from their citizens. The government would be censoring the information held within the books, but censoring is not always a good decision. Having a world without books would include information being hidden from the entire population, censorship being placed upon all printed material, and people not being able to read books for recreation or education. A society may prompt to ban books and other forms of written material because they want to hide information from their citizens. Books often include topics, such as rebellion, murder, and other illegal activities, that the government does not want presented to the population. Taking away books would restrict people from gaining access to new ideas, since much of what people

In some cases, censorship can be a good way to keep people away from something that can be harmful to them. For example, there is a rating system put in place for movies to help prevent young children from watching mature or inappropriate material. On the contrary, censorship can also stop people from experiencing the things going on around them. If someone is blocked from writings about current events or news articles, they will not be able to create their own opinions on the world around them. When people are hidden from the horrors of the world as children and teenagers, it can lead to cultural ignorance when they grow up and become adults. Censoring certain materials may be a valid decision for certain situations and young children, but overall, censoring only leads to people being uneducated and