Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Texas constitution changes
Pros and cons to amending the texas constitution
Pros and cons to amending the texas constitution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Texas constitution changes
Proposition 1: Good or bad idea?
On November 3 of this year, Texans will have the opportunity to vote on several proposed amendments to the Texas constitution. The first of these, Proposition 1, proposes to increase the homestead exemption available to property owners from $15,000 to 25,000. Supporters of the measure claim the amendment would provide much needed tax relief for Texans across the state, among other benefits. On the other hand, opponents of the measure argue that this proposed amendment would alienate Texans who don't own property, in addition to other complaints. Is this amendment a good or bad idea? This essay will attempt to shed some light on the matter by analyzing the arguments for an against the amendment. I'll also argue
…show more content…
why I believe the amendment is a bad idea, and make a guess as to whether this amendment will pass this coming election. Proposition 1 was authored by Senator Jane Nelson and proposed under Senate Joint Resolution 1.
According to a summary by the Texas Legislative Council, the amendment would increase “the portion of the market value of a residence homestead that is exempt from ad valorem taxation for public school purposes from $15,000 to $25,000.” (8) An analysis by the Dallas Morning News observed the amendment as translating to a $120-130 a year relief for the average Texan. (Garrett) Additionally, the proposed amendment also increases the exemption amount for elderly or disabled persons. Finally, the amendment would also allow the Texas legislature to prohibit the reduction or elimination of a tax exemption imposed by the governing body of a political subdivision. (House Research Organization 5) A hearing on the measure was held by the Texas House Ways and Means Committee on May 12, 2015. (Proposition 1 Hearing) Based on the hearing, I believe the North Texas Tea Party and the Texas State Secretary Office (among others) are for the measure. Some opponents of the measure included the Center for Public Policy Priorities, the Texas Taxpayer Research Organization, and the Texas Association of Business. What arguments for an against the amendment do these contenders …show more content…
have? Supporters for the amendment argue that the measure would provide a much needed tax break for Texas homeowners. The economic impact would be beneficial as Texans would keep more money in their pocket at the end of the year. Advocates for the amendment also point out that Texans with fixed income would be able to keep their homes. This is in contrast to the alternative which would involve Texans being priced out of their homes due to rising property taxes. Against the amendment are those who argue that a tax cut would be much more effective if it were done on the sales tax. Such a tax cut would be more equitable since relief would be provided for all Texans – not just homeowners. As a result, opponents claim that the tax cut would not provide noticeable relief for the average Texan. Moreover, the measured is argued to be unsustainable in the long-term due to the mechanisms for paying for such a proposal. Despite the arguments for the amendment, I believe the measure is a poor idea as far as tax relief is concerned. Perhaps the strongest argument against the homestead exemption increase arises from the fact that the intended targets are Texas homeowners.
Texas renters aren't specifically targeted by the measure so any supposed benefits to them are intangible and hard to quantify. The measure also proposes to reimburse schools for loss of funding by using surplus funds and tax money from oil and gas sales. It's questionable whether this method of reimbursement is sustainable over the long-term considering the proposed tax cuts from Proposition 1 would be permanent. Because of this, I don't think the measure is a good idea. Any efforts to provide tax relief for Texans should instead be focused on the sales tax. In the end, Proposition 1 doesn't provide tax relief for all Texans in a fair
manner. Texans will have the opportunity to vote on this possible amendment this coming November. Proposition 1 would increase the homestead exemption from $15,000 to $25,000 for homeowners. The arguments supporting the proposition claim it will provide a much needed tax cut for Texans. However, the people against it argue that the tax relief efforts are better focused on the sales tax. Ultimately, I have to agree with the detractors in their view that Proposition 1 does not account for all Texans. Despite this, I'm inclined to believe that Texans will decide to pass the amendment.
Proposition 30 (prop 30 or SB11) is supported by the schools and local public safety protection Act of 2012. Prop 30 is a tax initiative led by California governor Jerry Brown. Prop 30 is aimed at reducing forecasted budget cuts to public schools also higher education, by increasing the California sales tax from 7.25% to 7.50%for the next four years. It also will create three new tax brackets for taxable incomes. Incomes exceeding $250,000, $300,000 and $500,000 will pay more in taxes for the next seven years. With the extra money being saved will go towards adding more classes for higher education students. Also to help reduce California’s state budget, prop 30 should raise $6 billion annually form raised taxes.
Texas Constitution is long and detailed, containing a range of statutory provisions that specify exactly what the government is allowed to do and is prohibited to do. In case of any public policy challenges, public
The American way of living and thinking in Texas have changed tremendously over the past century. Political ideals are one thing that changes with time, and have transformed with the changing times well. The Texas constitution of 1876 was a landmark for the state and has been part of the state’s history since then. The Texas constitution of 1876 is still in use today but with all its harsh restrictions it is considered one of the most confusing of all the state constitutions. The constitution became one of the most prominent changes to Texas education system and politics.
Texas and Federal Constitutions contain the principles needed for a representative democratic government and both arose from different historical situations; for instance, the U.S. Constitution was made to replace the Articles of Confederation, a weak decentralized form of national government with no president or taxes, which made the government not powerful enough to start a war. The U.S. Constitution was made to improve these weaknesses by proposing a degree of centralization which increased government power. On the other hand, Texas Constitution was made to reverse or avoid the ideas of the U.S. Constitution. On one part, the U.S. Constitution wanted to empower government action whereas the Texas Constitution wanted to weaken government action. The Texas Constitution is more geared toward protecting people’s rights whereas the U.S. Constitution protects the nation’s interest. The Texas Constitution has been amended more than 300 times whereas the US Constitution includes the Bill of Rights and the subsequent
The U.S. Constitution and the Texas Constitution have similarities and differences. First, both constitutions consist of a Bill of Rights. This is a formal summary of the rights and liberties considered essential to a people or group of people. The individual rights provide a variety of restraints on political power to protect people against unwarranted intrusions and abuses. Also, in both constitutions it outlines and talks about the powers of government in each separate department. Both talk about suffrage, taxation and revenue, along with general provisions, and modes of amending the c...
...neth M. Goldstein, and William G. Howell. "Chapter 20 The Social and Economic Milieu of Texas Poltics." Understanding American Politics and Government. Texas ed. New York: Longman, 2010. 690-93. Print.
In my analysis of the Texas Constitution I will assess the three branches of our State Government, the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch and finally the Judicial Branch. Our State Government resembles our National Government in various ways but also in very different ways which we will review in this essay. I will identify a handful of criticisms and problems associated with the provisions in each of these branches of our State Government and identify suggested reforms that many feel are needed.
Texas is big! From the size of the state, to our trucks, and to our pride, there are countless examples of why “everything is bigger in Texas”. Even our state constitution is bigger! With approximately 87,000 words and 474 amendments, the current Texas Constitution of 1876 is one of the longest state constitutions in the United States. Compared to the United States Constitution with only 4,400 words and 27 amendments, one wonders how the Texas state and local governments can operate efficiently with such an overwhelming document. The length and detail of the constitution stem from the specific policies written into the document, making it statutory in nature. This specificity has resulted in a restrictive document that requires frequent amending.
The Texas Constitution continues to be in a constant state of development as there have been 673 amendments proposed since 1876 and 491 of which have been adopted. This ability for both the Texas Constitution and the citizens themselves to adapt to change shows the strength of each. The Constitution is stronger as a result of the people and the people continue to be stronger as a result of the Constitution. With the authority that was delegated by the Texas Constitution to the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial departments the citizens of the State of Texas have been given a strong foundation upon which to build a tremendous
Every citizen, as incumbent citizens within the State of Texas, has certain responsibilities and undertakings to consider. Included in such considerations are the roles we are slated with when selecting an elected official for our Congressional District. This Congressional District representative is a person elected by “the people”, such as those in a city or county, in hopes that they will have a voice to represent the decisions designed to impact their areas, respectfully. One such Congressional District representative is Lamar Seeligson Smith.
Missouri and Florida’s New Laws Constitutional? Missouri Law Review, Spring2012, Vol. 77 Issue 2, p567-589. 23p. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=aef9f6f7-734d-4a6c-adae-2b97736ecc93%40sessionmgr111&vid=2&hid=127
This voter guide covers Proposition 55, Extension of the Proposition 30 Income Tax Increase. Some pros are that it only will affect the top 1.5% of Californians and will not raise any current taxes. Some cons are that it will extend an increase that was meant to be temporary and that it is not necessary considering the projected 11.5 billion dollars in budget reserves at the end of the 2016-2017 fiscal year. My recommendation is to vote in opposition of this proposition because doing so will promote the growth of small businesses, jobs, and the economy. It would also be more beneficial to optimize our current budget instead of depending on taxing the rich.
Furthermore, the proposition states many beneficial outcomes due to it being passed but never do they address any negative outcomes due to it. All of this is done with the right use of word which appeals to the reader’s emotions causing one to vote with their feelings and not their knowledge. What is being stated in the proposition are only things to sway a voter into voting for it. For instance, it talks about how with the money being saved from having fewer inmates in prison will be redirected towards bettering higher education by purchasing learning devices, books, and other material. With this being said, it is obvious that the intended voters are parents of adolescents. The reason being is that parents are the most vulnerable in this
...he surrounding area are required (and thus get more funding from local property taxes), by law and Education Code, to give a portion of their funding to school districts that are “poor” in order to boost the “poor” school districts performance; this idea of taking from the rich and giving to the poor is why it is dubbed the “Robin Hood” plan (Smith, Schools are Reassigned to Robin Hood, 2011). This bill was the first in a long series of proposed bills that was ruled as a constitutional solution for the 1989 Texas Supreme Court case Edgewood v. Kirby, but it is also the reason for the not only the current lawsuit filed by approximately 600 school districts (both wealthy and poor), but also the 2003 school funding lawsuit (Texas School Finance History, n.d.). It has been ruled unconstitional several times throughout its history, yet it still remains in practice today.
Foner, Eric, and John A. Garraty. "Homestead Act." The Reader's Companion to American History. Dec. 1 1991: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 06 Feb. 2014.