Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fiscal policies during the great recession
Fiscal policies during the great recession
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fiscal policies during the great recession
“Proposition 30”
Proposition 30 (prop 30 or SB11) is supported by the schools and local public safety protection Act of 2012. Prop 30 is a tax initiative led by California governor Jerry Brown. Prop 30 is aimed at reducing forecasted budget cuts to public schools also higher education, by increasing the California sales tax from 7.25% to 7.50%for the next four years. It also will create three new tax brackets for taxable incomes. Incomes exceeding $250,000, $300,000 and $500,000 will pay more in taxes for the next seven years. With the extra money being saved will go towards adding more classes for higher education students. Also to help reduce California’s state budget, prop 30 should raise $6 billion annually form raised taxes.
If Prop 30 was a around when I graduated from high school I would of went to college right away. Prop 30 would of provided more classes for students to attend instead I decided to go a different for a few years. Plus college was out of my budget at the time. So I decided to join the merchant marines, which allowed me to make good money and save for college. I was in the merchant marines for 5 ½ years. With more classes and lower tuition I believe you would see more people choose to further their higher education instead of working a dead end job.
Conservatives believe that prop 30 is unconstitutional. Californians will endure the biggest tax hike in years. Tax payers will cough up $6 billion annually to fund the education expense. Michelle Steele states “Prop 30 won’t fix our schools or stabilize the state budget; it will increase tax volatility and leave our children facing more of the same debt” (Steele). You can’t make a judgment like that till has been in effect for a few years Michelle Steele ...
... middle of paper ...
...e able lower tuition because of prop 30.
Before prop 30 was in affect students were going different directions. Students are taking up careers that don’t require a higher education degree. Its not just tuition that is holding people back from attending higher education, it’s the lack of classes which are one a first come basis. With prop 30 it puts more people in classes. Jessika Jones believes "Affordability of higher education was a problem even before the state’s current budget crisis. But with recent budget cuts, the situation is worsening. Students and their families are taking on higher debt, and costs may deter students from attending college"(Jones). Students are taking up an apprenticeship which leads to pretty decent careers. Because college tuition is so expensive and less classes this drops college reputation as well as their graduation rate.
Proposition 47, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, is an act that applies savings towards mental health and drug treatment programs. It is extremely controversial and viral, with large amounts of support and protests. This piece of rhetoric is relevant and has a critical impact on our local community and state of California. As the Californian General Election Official Voter Guide states, the goal of Prop 47 is to “…ensure that prison spending is focused on violent and serious offenses, to maximize alternatives for non-serious, nonviolent crime, and to invest the savings generated from this act into prevention and support programs in K–12 schools, victim services, and mental health and drug treatment” (Bowen 70). This explains
to tear this law down I believe that California can not afford to do without
Classes today are really expensive, especially with the more classes that the school requires a student to take. According to a 2010 study by the University of California’s Civil Rights Project, “Two-thirds of students at one California’s State University campus weren’t able to get into their required courses.” This means that the students at that school will stay in school for more than four years than they intended. Plus, most students tend’ to take fewer classes than they should, this will hold them back from getting their degree, which cost them more than staying in college for more than four
Proposition 36 The Real Truth As you might already be aware, there is a ballot initiative in this upcoming November’s election about drugs, and drug treatment. This measure is called Proposition 36. If this measure were to pass, state law would be changed, so that certain non-violent adult offenders who use or possess illegal drugs would receive drug treatment and supervision in the community, not prison. Right now, California is ranked number one in the nation for its rate of imprisonment for drug offenders. If Proposition 36 passes, California could become number one for its treatment of drug offenders.
Proposition 8 was a piece of legislation formally called the California Marriage Protection Act which was an amendment to the Constitution of the State of California. The amendment was voted on and passed during the state elections of November 5th, 2008. The new legislation added to the constitution reads: “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” The issue was prompted in May of 2008, when the California Supreme Court ruled that same sex couples had a right to marry one another according to the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution of the United States. This overruled earlier legislation known as Proposition 22, which was in fact the same as Proposition 8, but was a part of California’s Family Code, and not written into the constitution. Because the Constitution was given precedence over the Family Code in the Supreme Court’s ruling, Proposition 22 was rendered obsolete. Many people who shared conservative views about the meaning of marriage took exception to that and took action to create Proposition 8.
In 1965, the Secondary Education Act (ESEA) passed by President Lyndon B. Johnson even though there was concern prior to that date. It outlined and provided funds for educational programs that were considered essential for public education. The ESEA was followed in 1967 by Title VII providing federal funding for the Bilingual Education Act of 1968. Following this Act was the 1982 amendment to the Bilingual Education Act of 1968, making guidelines more flexible. Then in 1994, California, introduced and passed Proposition 187 denying illegal immigrants health care, social services, and public education. It was challenged and the U.S. District Court confirmed that the federal government has exclusive authority of immigration policies and thus, the law was unconstitutional. So in 1998, California responded by passing Proposition 227 stating that all California students must be taught in English placing all non-English speaking students in a short-term English immersion program. The government, noting that student scores were declining, passed the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001 mandating each state to measure every public school student's progress in reading and math from the third grade through the ei...
On November 5, 2002, voters approved the reduction of class sizes around the state, much to the dismay of the governor and well-informed citizens everywhere. Governor Bush previously had warned that the revision to the constitution would cost $27.5 billion over eight years and would force the state to raise taxes and cut services. Unfortunately, naïve supporters of class size reduction chose to go ahead with the modification of the constitution for emotional reasons, having no actual evidence demonstrating benefit from smaller classes. Much evidence exists, however, to demonstrate why this amendment should not have been passed.
dropout, due to lack of effort, B. finish with an associate’s degree and limit their choices in a job compared, or C. continue after a community college and further their degree at a university. Yet, the third reason is the reason that makes the proposal questionable as to whether it is really a need or if it’s a want by the people that want money handed to them to help their future. If people can afford two more years of college after a community college, or they have scholarships to help them pay for the following two years, then why can they not afford a community college that can be less than a thousand dollars to attend to? The proposal seems to be something that is not totally needed to be one more thing that raises taxes, as there are scholarships for various cases and made to be affordable to further an education after high
Once a person graduates from high school they are left with a difficult decision, wither to go to college or not. Some families this is not an option, their kid will go no matter what, but many students do not want to go to school and have so much student debt by the time they finish that they will have to pay off that they decide that college is not worth it. According to Craig Smith in his article in Education Digest he says, “too many families cannot afford to send their children to college so the student is left with making the decision on wither to go to college and collect debt or just skip college altogether” (Smith 42). He has a good point. Too many students feel like they have to pay so much yet they are not really getting much out of it. Smith later on in his article states, “We must stop balancing our state and institutional budgets on the backs of students and families” (Smith 46). School should not be all about money, it should be about helping the students get the education that they need so they can make it out in the big world. If a student is so worried about how they are going to pay their school bill they are not going to be focusing on their class work and it ...
...ter homes, they can add a tax levy to help support their education according to state and local guidelines.
Student then wouldn’t have to stress about working at the same time just to pay tuition fees. Students today over work, using the rest of their money to get energy drinks keep going from doing homework and attending college courses daily. According to the New York Times Article “College for the Masses”, studies have claimed, “Enrolling more students in community colleges may well make economic sense. So, in all likelihood, would create more and better vocational training, for well-paid jobs like medical technician and electrician, which don’t require a bachelor’s degree.” This makes students pushed harder to focus on any college that will be offer free. Thus, it wouldn’t take them longer than the average 4 years, due to them working full time as well as schooling. With fees out the way parents don’t have to worry about not making enough savings for their child to be able to attend for college. Students would be more focused on any subject in school as they strive for their
How does the rising cost of college tuition affect us? Every year thousands of students attend a college or university, usually of their choice, with the goal of achieving a higher education and to better their future. The cost of attending college is too high and it needs to go down; there needs to be more scholarship and grant opportunities. The high cost of attending college is a major reason that students aren’t able to achieve higher education; others take this as a challenge and it is motivation for them to work harder to achieve their goal. One might ask why would someone want to spend money to receive more education and miss out on more years of work that they could’ve performed? For many, it is so they can receive more salary for the jobs that they will have later in life, also so that they can get training for their wanted career. The cost of attending college is high and continues to rise without indications of decreasing. The rising cost has many benefits such as earning more pay, but it also has its disadvantages such as the debt that is accumulated from student loans. Not everyone can afford to drop down thousands of dollars and attend school for a few more years. Students who wish to receive a post-secondary education must decide whether it is the right choice for them depending on their financial standpoint, meaning that they must decide if they have the resources to further their education.
There are so many students who would extremely grateful to attend any four year institution but can’t because of the lack of funds. College life can be very stressful, and the process can is very frustrating to most students the first two years. When the cost of college tuition is compared to the 21 century financial economy the cost does not make sense, because for a middle-class family it is impossible to afford sending their child to any four-year institution. It hard for students to graduate with the stress to pay-off hundreds and thousands of dollars in loans. Going to college is stressful enough without the need to worry about how we’re going to pay for it and what other costs will continue to rise with getting a degree afterwards. With the current increase of unemployment rate and the thought of going to college seems like a farfetched goal. Many people choice not to attend a four year institution, because they did receive a scholarship or enough government funding. Having a college background is very important for professional growth, it will eventually limit career opportunities. My stand point is, you may not leave college doing the same thing you began with but the life experience is endless. College experience not only gives knowledge that builds you into a better person by giving a broader erosion. With the cost of tuition increasing will hurt our generation, by causing physical and mental stress but in the end it will all pay off. Not all colleges are for the blame; some of the blame is our economy and other factors play a big roll. As students we need to be aware of all our resources offered, such as Pell Grants, and government scholarships. For example, the some states will pay for a student’s college if they graduate high school with a GPA of 3.5 or higher. There are many states that are willing to pay for all or some of college tuition only if students are willing to use
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, college tuition and relevant fees have increased by 893 percent (“College costs and the CPI”). 893 percent is a very daunting percentage considering that it has surpassed the rise in the costs of Medicare, food, and housing. As America is trying to pull out of a recession, many students are looking for higher education so they can attain a gratified job. However, their vision is being stained by the dreadful rise in college costs. College tuition is rising beyond inflation. Such an immense rise in tuition has many serious implications for students; for example, fewer students are attending private colleges, fewer students are staying enrolled in college, and fewer students are working in the fields in which they majored in.
The first reason why one may say that college tuition isn’t too much is because they aren’t paying for it. There are students who are attending colleges and institution on scholarships and grants. They don’t have to worry about the costs because the government has given them free money to go to school because of their academics, athletic abilities, or any other ability one may possess. The second reason why one may say that college tuition isn’t too much is because they went to college years ago when the costs of everything regarding school was cheap. As it was stated earlier, college tuition is increasing every year. When these people were in school tuition wasn’t really much of concern. In California as of 2015, the tuition cost for attending a California State University is over $6,000 and over $13,000 for the University of California school systems (Henshaw). 10-20 years ago college students didn’t have to worry about the high costs and it was more affordable to go to school. The final reason why someone may say that college tuition isn’t too much is because they didn’t choose to go to school at all. If you didn’t go to college you wouldn’t have to worry about school