Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control in the US essay
Gun control in the US essay
History of the beginning of gun in usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gun control in the US essay
The Problem and Target The Project I will be focusing on is Project Exile, which started in Richmond, Virginia in 1997. In Richmond, the national murder rate had increased in the early 1990s; many of these murders were due to gun violence (Bialik, n.d.). Young men primarily between the ages of 15 to 34 were the main targets of this gun violence both as the victims and offenders. The mayors and police chiefs were looking for a way to reduce this violence (Bialik, n.d.). Project Exile sought to stop gun violence. Instead of cases which involved illegal firearms going to a state court which was what usually occurred, they were sent to federal court where offenders were less likely to receive bail and more likely to receive a mandatory minimum …show more content…
Richmond Virginia was stricken with high levels of murder due to illegal guns being carried by criminals and ex-cons (Bialik, n.d.). Due to the high frequency of these murders, Project Exile was implemented with the main goal of taking illegal firearms off the streets. This program not only brought cases to the federal court, which resulted in mandatory minimums given out to the accused, instead of bail but also had a main focus on media and advertisements. There were billboards, add on and in buses, TV commercials, traffic reports and shopping bags, which advertised Project Exile (United States House of Representatives House Judiciary Committee, 2000). This project had a very important goal of letting the public know that the laws for carrying an illegal firearm were harsh and inevitable. The more the public was aware of this program, the more the police departments hoped that the violent gun crimes would diminish. Success to the police department and Mayor would be that crimes involving illegal firearms would be severely lessoned, and hopefully even fully …show more content…
The project is very transferable and can be used by different police departments. These police departments would have to change the plan to assist their specific needs. Project Exile was seen as very successful in Richmond and has been implemented in different cities along the United States. According to the U.S. Attorney, Boston was another successful city in which the program was implemented. Virginias Governor also announced the introduction of Project Exile in 1999, although their plan involved a three-year mandatory minimum as opposed to the five years (Schiller, 1997). It was recommended to eh U.S. Treasury Secretary that Project exile be expanded and implemented into 150 cities by October 1, 2003 (Burke,
Community and problem oriented policing are responsible for creating strong responses to public safety, fear and crime problems. They aim to analyze problems and frame strategic feedback using a variation of approaches. Through a procedure of analysis, evaluation, and problem identification; problem-oriented policing has been successful against a variety of fear, crime, and order concerns. The Boston Ceasefire program is considered to be problem-oriented policing it mostly aimed at taking on serious, widespread crime problems; like homicide victimization among the youth in Boston. Boston is one the cities in the United States that experienced an epidemic of youth homicide and illegal gun use between the late 1980s and early 1900s.
Those who participated in Project BUILD, only 33% youths returned to the juvenile detention center within that year, compared to 57% of youths who were not part of the program. The study also discovered a significant difference between the Project BUILD participants and non-Project BUILD participants. The Project BUILD participants took about 9.6 months to recidivate compared to non-participants who only took approximately 7.6 months. BUILD Violence Intervention Curriculum did significantly reduce the recidivism rate for the
Crime in New Orleans is treacherously high; it has been the worst year since 2004. The ordeal lies with trying to teach old dogs new tricks instead of doing the unattainable the justice system should focus on children who are still innocent and deserving of a better future. Kids need persistent discipline, but if their parents are sluggish on the matter how are they going to learn right from wrong? P.A.S.T. will help teach kids that the violence is nothing but history. The program will help children in any household setting because the program’s converge doesn’t have much to do with the children’s parents, nor is it optional. Therefore, the parents will not have a choice in the matter of having their children taken out of P.A.S.T. that will be determined solely by the judge, but they can request for their child to be placed into the program. The program is focused on the first crime or things children would normally not receive punitive measures for whether it either be in the household or in public ranging from acts of defiance to misdemeanors, such as stealing small items, getting in fights, or relentless disrespect or abuse towards parents or siblings. Ways to improve the crime rate in New Orleans are to follow the step process of P.A.S.T which is to punish, assess, show sentiment, and thrive.
with issues for the juveniles and their families. There is a team of people in the court system who
Today, half of state prisoners are serving time for nonviolent crimes. Over half of federal prisoners are serving time for drug crimes. Mass incarceration seems to be extremely expensive and a waste of money. It is believed to be a massive failure. Increased punishments and jailing have been declining in effectiveness for more than thirty years. Violent crime rates fell by more than fifty percent between 1991 and 2013, while property crime declined by forty-six percent, according to FBI statistics. Yet between 1990 and 2009, the prison population in the U.S. more than doubled, jumping from 771,243 to over 1.6 million (Nadia Prupis, 2015). While jailing may have at first had a positive result on the crime rate, it has reached a point of being less and less worth all the effort. Income growth and an aging population each had a greater effect on the decline in national crime rates than jailing. Mass incarceration and tough-on-crime policies have had huge social and money-related consequences--from its eighty billion dollars per-year price tag to its many societal costs, including an increased risk of recidivism due to barbarous conditions in prison and a lack of after-release reintegration opportunities. The government needs to rethink their strategy and their policies that are bad
Rostron, Allen, and Brian Siebel. "No Gun Left Behind: The Gun Lobby's Campaign to Push Guns into Colleges and Schools." Www.bradycampaign.org. N.p.: Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, 2007. 9-11. Rpt. in Juvenile Crime. Ed. Louise I. Gerdes. Detroit: Greenhaven, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Overcrowding in our state and federal jails today has become a big issue. Back in the 20th century, prison rates in the U.S were fairly low. During the years later due to economic and political factors, that rate began to rise. According to the Bureau of justice statistics, the amount of people in prison went from 139 per 100,000 inmates to 502 per 100,000 inmates from 1980 to 2009. That is nearly 261%. Over 2.1 million Americans are incarcerated and 7.2 million are either incarcerated or under parole. According to these statistics, the U.S has 25% of the world’s prisoners. (Rick Wilson pg.1) Our prison systems simply have too many people. To try and help fix this problem, there needs to be shorter sentences for smaller crimes. Based on the many people in jail at the moment, funding for prison has dropped tremendously.
Most people have the common view that the criminal justice system’s increasing arrests and imprisonment is an effective strategy for reducing crime. If the judicial system makes greater distinction among violent and nonviolent crimes, the prisons will have the vacancies to incarcerate the Jeffery Dahmers of the world in prison for life. By providing alternatives to imprisonment for nonviolent offenders will reduce the burden of taxpayer’s dollars for added funding for construction of new prisons. I know as a College Student I would like to see increased State funding for education system rather than the millions allocated to the prison system of Pennsylvania.
Show the problem exists: “Critics of the juvenile justice system claim that approximately 500,000 youths who move through to the nation’s pretrial detention centers each year—70 percent of them nonviolent offenders—are thousands too many and that this experience may even increase the chances that they will commit more crimes and go “deeper” into the system” (Hardy 2007). These numbers are staggering. Of these half a million youths 350,000 of them will be re-incarcerated in just a matter of 12 months or less. This is an epidemic that can no longer be avoided. The arrest rates for juvenile violent offenses have also significantly increased over the past few decades with a 61% rise in arrests for violent offenses, even despite the fact that violent offenders are a relatively small proportion...
... member or has served in prison so they could change their lives by turning away from crime, they also get training to detect problems before they happen like shootings. This solution would help my community's problem because cure violence has reduced shootings and killings by -41% to -73%. Also they saw a 100% homicide reduction in 5 out of 8 communities. This is some big improvements that are going on other communities. One of the communities was Englewood and it saw a -40% reduction is shooting density. If this solution is not implemented in my community nothing will change you will still see crime and deaths. There are already 110 homicides so far in the New City community. That's a lot and you will keep seeing these numbers if they don't put a plan into action to stop the gangs. They need to start to interact with the people who are high risk to joining a gang.
Wilson, J.A & Davis, R.C. (2006). Criminology and Public Policy. Good Intentions meet Hard Realities: An Evaluation of Project Green light Reentry Program.
The battle my neighborhood in Brentwood faces is frightening, specifically for a minority society. Being that I come from various cities and states, I’ve noticed a shift from how a community comes together to support one another into a society that’s mainly about individualism. Accordingly, Brentwood has been known for their reputation of gang violence, drugs, and crimes including homicide. Just recently, four teenage boys were brutally manslaughter in the front and back of their vehicle by MS13 gang members. Prior to the incident, two young girls from Brentwood High School was murdered by the same gang. For this reason, a big issue we face in Brentwood is the security of us young kids and teenagers and safety of our beings.
As stated in lecture, there are several necessary policy changes that need to be made to our current juvenile justice system: “1) Maintain leniency 2) Expand treatment 3) Expand initial diagnostic services 4) Continue solid research 5) Sustain adequate funding to programs and 6) Mandate (by la...
Many different types of projects in different countries have reduced levels of delinquency and violence by tackling the causes - to the extent to which crime is reduced through many different types and forms of crime prevention projects including: designing out crime; promoting social control; supporting young persons and families; breaking the cycle of violence against women and children; and promoting individual responsibility, as well as various types of incarceration programs like camps, ranches and various other juvenile prisons. In this report I will be presenting some of the results from crime prevention partnerships that are based on city action, on police and justice cooperation with other agencies, and other community based programs.
The Operation Weed and Seed, a U.S. Department of Justice community-based initiative, is an innovative and comprehensive multi-agency approach to law enforcement, crime prevention, and community revitalization. Operation Weed and Seed is foremost a strategy—rather than a grant program—which aims to prevent, control, and reduce violent crime, drug abuse, and gang activity in designated high-crime neighborhoods across the country. (2005, U.S. Department of Justice). This Program would assist us in preventing crime and also to reduce crime. Individuals that are a part of the Weed and Seed, could assist also in providing information as well.