Professional Learning Community Analysis

A successful Professional Learning Community can be defined largely by the attributes observed in a school setting. The textbook offers a breakdown of how to assess the implementation of learning community characteristics in a school, and the first step is identified as conducting a survey amongst the staff members. The textbook describes the process in detail, “… conduct a survey to assess the extent to which they (teachers) believe the learning community characteristics are presently operational in your school” (Roberts & Pruitt, 2009 p. 25-26). While, identifying the characteristics of a PLC in a school is vital, the purpose of conducting this survey was not simply for teachers and staff to identify characteristics in the school, but the

Overall findings reveal that the participants share the same view as it relates to the PLC attributes observed within the school. Based on the data collected, the area of PLC that is best practiced in my school is Supportive Conditions with an emphasis on Relationships and Supportive Conditions with an emphasis on Structures. Table 1:1, illustrates that 11 out of 11 participants selected the highest score, strongly agree on survey statements 33 through 43. The results revealed that participants observed attributes that support relationships within the school. Participants also found that loving relationships existed among the staff and were built on trust and respect. This characteristic is frequently displayed on the school campus. For example, faculty and staff work well together during meetings and school events. The school environment is one that promotes trust and teamwork among the staff. Additional results revealed that participants observed attributes that support structure. Participants found that efficient school time is provided to facilitate cooperative work among staff members. I observe this attribute firsthand at our school, leadership ensures that staff members have adequate time to collaborate and plan with their grade-level

OR

Analysis techniques are appropriate but better techniques could have revealed deeper findings. Analysis techniques not explained.

OR

Analysis methods are incorrect or not appropriate for the data collected.

Findings Findings are presented as a synthesis of the data; findings are organized around the research questions; evidence is provided to support findings and includes graphs and/or charts Findings are presented organized around the research questions but lack synthesis; evidence is provided but may not be the most appropriate or complete evidence; includes graphs and/or charts but are not supportive of findings Findings are presented in an unorganized manner.

OR

Data are presented as results with no interpretation or synthesis; lacks graphs/charts.

Conclusion Conclusion summarizes succinctly and expresses future project based on findings. Conclusion is not succinct.

OR

Conclusion does not express future project No conclusion is