Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature of accounting standard
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction In researching the topic of Non GAAP vs. GAAP Reporting, Group 6 was able to understand the effects that reporting has on the company and how it affects overall market conditions. We were able to find that the guidelines companies follow for reporting can be influenced and portrayed in a more appealing way if Pro Forma reporting is chosen. Pro Forma Earnings Pro Forma reporting is based on projected amounts that are intended to portray data in an appealing way to investors. This method of reporting allows the company to exclude certain items from financial statements, including non-recurring costs that are nonessential to the company. A Pro Forma financial statement allows for management to smooth their financial statements …show more content…
and represent what they deem appropriate to investors. Items that can typically excluded from pro forma financial statements include stock options for executives, acquisition costs, and other one time costs. Pro-Forma and variations from GAAP? Any publicly traded company is required to submit the reported earnings in accordance to GAAP.
These reported earnings are based off of the audited financial statements as prepared from the 10-K and 10-Q report. However when a company issues financial projections with pro forma reporting, GAAP assurance cannot be given. The most that an audit commitee can give is compilation report based on management's pro forma assumptions. When conducting a formal examination the auditor's report that statements issued using pro forma reporting are in compliance with AICPA but not GAAP. Companies with a preference for Pro Forma Currently there is a certain segment of companies who prefer the use of pro forma reporting. Technology and Biotech companies generally prefer to disclose earning through pro forma reporting due to the ability to leave disclosures such as stock options and exclude one time startup costs. Pro forma reporting allows for the financial statements to be forecasted and present a better earnings picture for investors and lenders. While this may be favorable for management, shareholders are exposed to forecasting errors that can ultimately plague the actual value of the company. Why do companies prefer Pro …show more content…
Forma Pro forma reporting allows for a company to smooth reported earnings to appear favorable.
This can provide a more accurate view of the operational costs without having to include large one time transactions that hurt the value of the company. The use of pro forma reporting is usually beneficial to companies with specific industry characteristics. One example of this is cable and telephone companies. These companies struggle to produce an operating net profit due to large depreciation costs that are recorded. Reporting income using pro forma statements allows for companies in this industry to display a better projected profit number. Pro Forma reporting controversies Since 2010 companies in the S&P 500 have began to use pro forma to report earnings. As much as 90% of companies on this index have now transitioned away from GAAP. Pro Forma reporting has allowed for companies to selectively disclose the earning report by censoring financial events that they may deem non-essential and non-recurring. In 2015 it was reported that the S&P 500 was valued $256 billion higher using pro forma reported statements than the GAAP counterparts. Some notable cases in which a significant reporting discrepancy exist include the following: Amazon
(2001) Reported Pro Forma loss $49 Million GAAP Loss $234 Million Trump Hotel & Casino Resorts (1999) Reported $14 million profit GAAP loss $3 million Nortel Networks Corp.’s (2001) Reported pro forma loss $0.68 per share Reported pro forma loss $0.27 per share Actual GAAP Loss $1.08 per share Conclusion The continued use of Pro Forma reporting for financial statements is creating a false picture for investors in the market. The variance between GAAP earnings and Pro Forma earnings in the S&P 500 shows how the reporting divide has continued to increase since the early 2000’s. In order to lower volatility and ensure that the correct amount of earnings and disclosures are present on a company's financial statements, there must be a shift back to GAAP reporting standards.
Companies have to file tax returns that are in accordance with tax regulations and rules developed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The amounts reported under taxable income and financial income differs. These amounts are different because financial income is based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) which uses the accrual method to report revenues. Taxable income on the other hand, which is determined by rules and regulations of the IRS, follow a modified cash basis to determine revenue. Therefore, it can be seen that these amounts differ because of the differences between tax regulations and GAAP.
The goal of the Codification is to simplify the organization of thousands of authoritative U.S. accounting pronouncements issued by multiple standard-setters. To achieve this goal, the FASB initiated a project to integrate and topically organize all relevant accounting pronouncements issued by the U.S. standard-setters including those of the FASB, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
To help accounting professionals easily navigate through 50-plus years of unorganized US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and standards the Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation approved the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (Codification.) By codifying authoritative US GAAP, FASB will provide users with real-time and accurate information in one location. Concurrently, FASB developed the FASB Codification Research System; a web-based system allowing registered users to electronically research accounting issues. Since 2009, the codification became the single source of nongovernmental authoritative GAAP.
One of the most debatable topics in the accounting industry today is the extent in which we should make the financial statements understandable to the general population. The FASB currently gears its reporting standards toward...
Logue, A. C. (2014, April 21). Comparing U.S. GAAP and IFRS Accounting Systems. Retrieved from Dummies:
... standard and help to reduce the preparer cost. And it has also enhanced the financial statements decision usefulness and make the organization prepare for expanded disclosure requirements.
One disadvantage of using financial statements is the fact you cannot always provide people what they deserve due to cost. Greg said in many corporations certain repairs; equipment and pay raises have to be put aside, this is if the cost of production is too high and outweighs the revenue we make.
Pro-forma statements give an estimate of a company’s possible profit by removing one time charges. A company can use these statements to exclude anything the business believes takes away from the accuracy of its profit. One disadvantage to the pro-forma statements is they are not regulated as well as other statements under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The biggest advantage to pro-forma statements is that it can provide a more accurate view of the outlook and financial performance of a company.
Firstly, pro-forma earnings does not adhere to the strict guidelines that are enforced by GAAP, purely because the computed earnings results are projected and can be calculated by any number of measures that companies want to include, as there is not universal guidelines that must be followed when reporting pro-forma earnings. These measures that are included, or excluded, are decided by the company and they may not be recurring, and quite possibly be a once off occurrence. The occurrence of certain measure for accounting need to be stable and not just unsystematic because then the reported earnings will not be a true and accurate indication of future company performance and thus misleading investors when making decisions. The most common unaccepted practice when calculating pro-forma earnings is for companies to exclude information that could quite possibly be information that is important for shareholders to be aware of. Some of these measures may be excluded by companies to improve their reporting or make their future earnings performance look more promising. Companies may exclude but are not limited to information such as redundancies, depreciation in assets and obsolete stock to name a few. The intentional exclusion of information, or manipulation of measures, is widely unaccepted because investors are not informed of what is included and excluded. Although most firms exclude
This essay will discuss the influence NZ Framework brings to financial reporting standards that included NZ GAAP based on the debate between principles-based and rule-based. In particular, it will portray: (1) the nature and orientation of financial reporting framework and GAAP; (2) the main improvement of NZ Framework and the applications framework guided in NZ GAAP.
Schofield (2014) researches the difference between public and private company financial reporting. For instance, a private company has fewer consumers reviewing their financial statements, whereas public companies could have multiple consumers reviewing financial statements. In addition, private companies typically have less specialized accounting personnel, whereas public companies will have several. Lastly, Schofield (2014), reviewed the number of amendments proposed and finalized to help benefit private companies financial reporting.
Owners and managers require financial statements to make important business decisions that affect its continued operations. Financial analysis is then performed on these statements to provide management with a more detailed understanding of the figures. These statements are also used as part of management's annual report to the stockholders.
The globalization of business has resulted in the need for compatible accounting standards that can be used internationally for financial reporting. As a result, the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) were developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to unify the various financial reporting methods and create a single accounting standard which can be applied to any financial statement worldwide (Byatt). The global standardization of financial reporting will increase the readability and enhance comparability of globally traded companies’ financial statements, without the need of conversion or translation. There are a few main differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S GAAP). The increasing recognition and acceptance of the International Financial Reporting Standards by accounting professionals in the United States, will affect the way in which the U.S will record financial statements in the future.
Preparing general-purpose financial statements can be simple or complex depending on the size of the company. Some statements need footnote disclosures while other can be presented without any. Details like this generally depend on the purpose of the financial statements.
The success of a company is very dependent upon its financial accounting. In accounting there are numerous Regulatory bodies that govern the accounting world. These companies are extremely important to a company because they set the standards when it comes to the language and decision making of a company. These regulatory bodies can be structured as agencies, associations, commissions, and boards. Without companies like the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Internal Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and other regulatory bodies a company could not make well informed decisions. In this paper the author will look at only four of them.