Companies have to file tax returns that are in accordance with tax regulations and rules developed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The amounts reported under taxable income and financial income differs. These amounts are different because financial income is based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) which uses the accrual method to report revenues. Taxable income on the other hand, which is determined by rules and regulations of the IRS, follow a modified cash basis to determine revenue. Therefore, it can be seen that these amounts differ because of the differences between tax regulations and GAAP.
The majorities of financial advisers do not have a formal accounting or tax background and thus have some challenges to overcome when reading tax returns of their clients. However they are still asked to help their clients in future planning. Since most accounting is to be done based on compliance with GAAP it would make sense to think that tax accounting should also be done this way, however both the IRS and the courts have stated that compliance with GAAP is of little significance when dealing with the objectives of tax accounting. The objectives of both accounting methods are simply different, because the primary goal of financial accounting is to provide useful information to all stakeholders and the primary goal of the income tax system is the equitable collection of revenue. Because of these differences it can be said that the users of accounting information are different for both methods. The assumption for financial accounting is the going-concern and the tax accounting system ignores this assumption. These differences give us the concept of timing differences and permanent differences. Understanding...
... middle of paper ...
...usiness & Economics Research, 10(3), 149-156.
DHALIWAL, D. S., GLEASON, C. A., & MILLS, L. F. (2004). Last-Chance Earnings Management: Using the Tax Expense to Meet Analysts' Forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 431-459.
Donal E. Kieso, Wegandt J. Jerry, Warfield D. Terry. (2012). Intermediate Accounting. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Harrington C., Smith W., & Trippeer D. (2012). Deferred tax assets and liabilities: tax benefits, obligations and corporate debt policy. Journal of Finance & Accountancy, 1172-89.
JACKSON, S. B., SHOEMAKER, P. A., BARRICK, J. A., & BURTON, F. (2005). Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(2), 409-447.
Laux, R. C. (2013). The Association between Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities and Future Tax Payments. Accounting Review, 88(4), 1357-1383. Doi: 10.2308/accr-50417
In analyzing the common-size balance sheet for Applebee’s, it is noted that the total current assets has jumped from 11% to 14% of the total assets. The total assets for Applebee’s has jumped 6% from 2000 to 2001 driven by increased in the total current assets of 28%. Of those 28% increase, they consisted of 88% increase in the Cash & Equivalents (increased of $10.6 millions) caused by the decreased in the Capital Stock repurchasing in 2001 by Applebee’s. The repurchase of capital stock has decreased by 31% as noted from the year-to-year percentage changes of the Statement of Cash Flow which equivalent to about $11 million dollars. The other current assets increased was from the other Current Assets category; there was an increase of 92% from 2000 to 2001. Due to the higher earnings for Applebee’s, there was an increase in income tax due. A significant component of the increase of other Current Assets was from increased in prepaid income taxes with net deferred income tax asset of $6.7 millions dollars.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1985). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86. Norwalk. Retrieved April 7, 2014, from http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobnocache=true&blobwhere=1175820922177&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheadername2=Content-Length&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue2=189998&blobheadervalue1=filename%3Dfas86.pdf&blobcol=url
Romney, Marshal, and Paul Steinbart. Accounting Information Systmes. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2006. 193-195.
Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of accounting and economics, 5, 119
Warren, Alvin C., Jr. “Three Versions of Tax Reform.” William and Mary Law Review 39.1 (1997): 157-75. Academic OneFile. Web. 31 Mar. 2011.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2006, July 6). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Financial Accounting Series , 1-55.
In this chapter there were presented three basic discounted cash flow methods for firm valuation that are often used in practice and which explicitly or implicitly include the value of the tax shield of debt. It should be mentioned, as Bertoneche and Federici (2006) and Fernandez (2007a) prove, that the different valuation methods give the same result for total value of the firm as well as for the value of the tax shield of debt, as long as the valuation methods rely on the same hypotheses and do not implicitly include any additional assumptions. Indeed, Fernandez (2007a) notes: “This result is logical, as all the methods analyze the same reality under the same hypotheses; they differ only in the cash flows taken as a starting point for the valuation.”
Marshall, M.H., McManus, W.W., Viele, V.F. (2003). Accounting: What the Numbers Mean. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Towards the end of the 20th century it became apparent that companies were beginning to increasingly use an unconventional way of predicting their future performance in earnings. This alternative measure of anticipated earnings was fundamentally based on assumptions rather than historical evidence, which is why it was viewed as being unconventional when casting a business plan. Pro-forma earnings, is scrutinized as being deceptive because the calculations used to come up with the figures weren't a true reflection of the businesses profitability. The earnings reported by companies to no comply to the strict guidelines of the GAAP and companies can manipulate their data or measure to and report earning that are hypothetical (Epstein 2009; James
...tion of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividens, Retained Earnings, and Taxes. The American Journal Review, 46(2), pp. 97-113.
This paper will discuss these steps in detail. Because I work at home, I am not currently involved in any of the steps of the accounting cycle. The examples I give in this paper will be from various jobs I have held in the past.
From 1967 thru 1980, firms followed the comprehensive tax allocation procedures under APB Opinion #11 and reported deferred charges and credits. However, some problems arose from doing so. Because of the changes in tax rates and the nature of firm's investment, the balance of deferred tax credits on a firm's balance sheet began to grow in size instead of reversing and canceling out.
Zavadszky, Andrea. "New Accounting Needs Data and Analysis Skills." Classified Post. N.p., 30 Nov. 2013. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. .
"Accountants." WISCareers. University Of Wisconsin System Board of Regents, 2009. Web. 20 Nov. 2009. .
Maintaining a company’s financial assets is a daunting task. Cash management techniques and short-term financing provide accounting executives with the tools needed to survive the constant changes within the economy. The combination of these tools and the knowledge of the world economy will assist companies in maintaining current assets and facilitates growth.