Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of privatisation
Advantages and disadvantages of privatisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of privatisation
2. Privatization
Privatization is the process of transferring ownership of a business, enterprise, public service, etc. from a government to the private sector. It can also mean complete deregulation with no controls on entry, prices, and levels of service. However, the public authority usually specifies the level of service to be provided, the fares to be charged, and arranges for the marketing of the network of services and the sale of system-wide passes (Savage).
2.1 Advantages of Privatization
There are many reasons that explain the movement towards privatization. The main objective is to inject competition in order to provide services to citizens in a more efficient and cost effective manner.
2.1.1 Increase in Efficiency and Profitability
Most government industries and services are inefficient and running in losses. On the other hand, private companies have a profit incentive and will do jobs at the lowest cost, which eliminates waste and inefficiency. Their administration will improve and non-development expenditures will be reduced.
2.1.2 Decrease in Political Pressure
It is argued that government makes poor economic managers. Political pressures rather than sound economic and business sense motivate them (Pettinger, 2011). These illegal pressures can be reduced to a great extent in the hands of private owners.
2.1.3 Use of Latest Technology
Privatization leads to adoption of the global best practices to foster sustainable competitive advantage and improvised management of resources. Private companies will adopt the latest technology for the increase in output and their profits. This will result in the increase in national product, thus national income of the country will grow.
2.1.4 Shareholders
A private firm has pressu...
... middle of paper ...
...term profits and avoid investing in long-term projects, resulting in short termism of firm (Pettinger, 2011).
2.2.6 Privatization does not guarantee Savings
Proponents of privatizing public transit often make claims about savings through private sector efficiencies. But this is not true because public agencies are often more efficient since no profit margin gets siphoned off to shareholders.
2.2.7 Privatization can Undermine Safety
Private bus operators are known to have less experienced drivers and more mechanical difficulties (689). Drivers at private operators typically have much lower wages than public workers. Workers are driven out of their job as wages and benefits fail to keep pace with their experience as a safe and effective drivers. This results in high turnover, which carries additional training costs. These can present enormous safety hazards to riders.
In socio-economical aspect, TNCs do bring about benefits in the development of their host countries’ economies. According to cumulative causation, when TNCs outsource to a third party firm, there will be more jobs generated. Higher employment rate increases personal income of locals, thus generates more purchasing power for consumer goods, leading to growth and development of service industries, boosting the local economy. TNCs offer financial support to their host economies since they have to pay taxes to the local government and authorities. With this increased revenue, the government is able to invest in the development of better physical infrastructure, such as roads and electricity, and social services, such as health care and services. This in turn attracts more foreign direct investment (FDI) boosting overall economic growth. Taking China as example, 760 million rural people have migrated to urban areas for job opportunities. It is estimated that TNCs have helped to lift 200 million Chinese out of poverty.
2008, p. 144); in other words, the privatisation is a policy run and controlled by the government, this privatisation movement was based on human rights, control of prices and the regulations of the health services and social care in order to promote better outcomes and better standards of care.
...t the rising gas priced and the ridiculous cost of decent insurance. Then I have rode both buses and trolleys when somebody took the family car to work and I needed to take care of my own interests; I noticed that most people feel uncomfortable being around so many people, yet when a passenger needs help, conversation emerges and a new connection is made. I am generally a shy person, however I feel public transportation has helped me strengthen my communication skills. I am only one MTS customer; the difference it can make on all San Diegans can be huge. People underestimate public transportation since it has such a negative connotation; MTS is an exception because they have invested in ensuring that youth, seniors, adults and the disabled all have the same opportunity to rely on a clean, efficient, and friendly way to transport their citizens where they need to be.
...hn D. The Privatization Decision, Public Ends, Private Means, New York, 1989 (INGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY)
There is no individual owner in the Public Sector. Advantages: · Their main aim is to provide a service, not to make a profit · They will still run even if there is few people using the service · Government is in a good position to plan the overall provision for the country Disadvantages: · It is difficult to motivate employees in an impersonal business such as this · The tax payer has to meet higher tax payments if the business makes a loss · The running of the business can be politically influenced. Private Sector These are businesses owned and run by private people. To start a business in the Private Sector, they have to raise their own capital in order to pay for rent, stock, machinery etc. Some of these businesses can be small and owned and run by one person, other businesses can be larger and run by a group of people.
Generally speaking governments intervene in the market for two main reasons: "social efficiency and equity". [1] One does not expect to see a government intervene in the economy to favor a firm, or because the government would profit from such an intervention in the way a firm sees profit (except maybe voters positive perception of the intervention).
There are many reasons for a company to want to outsource the services or products that they need or want. Six of the biggest reasons for companies to outsource are motivation, specialization, survival of the economically fittest, economies of scale, heavier market coverage, and independence from any single manufacturer.
In the long run, an economy of a nation that seeks to gain wealth by focusing on expanding its industrial sectors through specialization and the division of labour is not only natural, but it is also beneficial for self-interests of all by creating more dexterous workers, increasing labour efficiency, and spurring innovation.
Nightingale, Demetra Smith and Pinus, Nancy. "Privatization of Public Social Services: A Background Paper". 1997. Internet http://www.urban.org/pubman/privatiz.html
According to Airport Corporate Research Program’s Privatization Guidebook, Privatization refers to the shifting of governmental functions, responsibilities, control, and in some cases ownership, in whole or in part, to the private sponsors (ACRP, 2012, p.1). The term airport privatization is often understood to mean the transfer of an entire airport to ...
This essay will examine the concept of market failure and the measures that governments take remedy the failure of the market.
Ohemeng, Frank, L.K. and Leone, Robert P. “Should Public Sector be RUN like a Business.” Approaching Public Administration. Edmond Montgomery Publications Limited, (2011), P. 1-362.
The Concentration of Economic Power in the Public Sector Undermines the Foundations of Economic Growth
In order for any country to survive in comparison to another developed country they must be able to grow and sustain a healthy and flourishing economy. This paper is designed to give a detailed insight of economic growth and the sectors that influence economic growth. Economic growth in a country is essential to the reduction of poverty, without such reduction; poverty would continue to increase therefore economic growth is inevitable. Through economic growth, it is also an aid in the reduction of the unemployment rate and it also helps to reduce the budget deficit of the government. Economic growth can also encourage better living standards for all it is citizens because with economic growth there are improvements in the public sectors, educational and healthcare facilities. Through economic growth social spending can also be increased without an increase of taxes.
Public Managers are uniquely positioned to positively affect policy process due to their tenure, job security, absence of political pressure and expanded role in the society. The