Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of transnational corporations on the global economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Transnational Corporations (TNCs) are firms that have the power to coordinate and control operations in more than one country, even if they do not own them. Many of the overseas branches of TNCs are located in less developed countries (LDCs), including newly industrialised economies (NIEs), recently industrialised economies (RIEs) and least developed economies. Generally, the socio-economical, environmental, cultural and political impacts brought by TNCs are more positive in more developed LDCs such as NIEs and some RIEs than other countries, mainly least developed countries.
In socio-economical aspect, TNCs do bring about benefits in the development of their host countries’ economies. According to cumulative causation, when TNCs outsource to a third party firm, there will be more jobs generated. Higher employment rate increases personal income of locals, thus generates more purchasing power for consumer goods, leading to growth and development of service industries, boosting the local economy. TNCs offer financial support to their host economies since they have to pay taxes to the local government and authorities. With this increased revenue, the government is able to invest in the development of better physical infrastructure, such as roads and electricity, and social services, such as health care and services. This in turn attracts more foreign direct investment (FDI) boosting overall economic growth. Taking China as example, 760 million rural people have migrated to urban areas for job opportunities. It is estimated that TNCs have helped to lift 200 million Chinese out of poverty.
However, it should be noted that boosting the economy of their host countries is not the TNCs’ primary objective, but a benefit brought about by...
... middle of paper ...
...argaining advantage that allows them to request to override these legislations and exploit the most out of the host economy. Desperately requiring FDI to boost the local economy, these countries provides tax breaks and subsidies, and slacken environmental regulations to create an attractive atmosphere for TNCs investments. As for more mature NIEs and RIEs, they have more efficient governments and stronger bargaining power which enable them to reap off greater benefits from the investments of TNCs and at the same time protect the local industries.
TNCs’ primary and ultimate objective is essentially to earn profits by taking advantage of natural resources, state policies, labour and markets. Although some advanced LDCs can secure their benefits brought by TNCs, many more lose out. Hence, the negative impacts of TNCs operating in LDCs overweigh the benefits they bring.
...n will definitely provide a better economy for these third world countries, but the only draw back is that it will not be a short-term effect. Lastly McFague in her essay provides a reasonable solution of ecological economics where everybody on one accord forgets their self-interest and understands that everyone is dependent upon each other. In the end no solution will work unless both categories of economic countries understand their position and begin to work together.
“The non-attainment area NSR program is designed to ensure that any new industrial growth in a non-at...
As GDP per capita grows, the country’s standard of living rises with it. This newfound wealthiness allows for nations to invest in infrastructure, such as roads and education, and establish socially-conscious institutions, such as the American EPA, FDA, and CDC. In addition to further increasing quality of life and working conditions, establishment of such infrastructre allows foreign investment to be absorbed even easier: “Findings in literature indicate that a country’s capacity to take advantage of FDI externalities might be limited by local conditions, such as the development of local financial markets or the educational level of the country, i.e., absorptive capacities.” As the citizens become more productive, the government has more funds to invest in its own economy, which further improves the productivity of its citizens. This positive feedback loop eventually produces the necessary infrastructure of the nation begins to support itself. It can then afford to employ more effective and safer means of production, and sweatshops are phased out, no longer necessary. From here, the downsides of sweatshops will be completely gone, and replaced with only net social
All research fully carried out on Entry nodes on the long run remain limited to large manufacturing firms. The foreign market selection and the choice of its entry modes drastically ascertain the performance of a specific firm. Entry mode can be defined as an arrangement for an organization that is organizing and conducting business in foreign countries like contractual transfers, joint ventures, and wholly owned operations (Anderson, 1997). Internationalization is part of a strategy which is going on for businesses and organizations transfers their operations across the national borders (Melin, 1992). The firm that is planning to have the operations across the border will have to choose the country that they are planning to visit. Anderson (1997) argues that the strategic market entry decisions forms a very important part of an organizational strategy. The decision to go international is part of the internationalization strategy of the firm. Multinational Corporations that desire to have international operations will find the strategy to go international, the mode of entry is very important. Even though there are studies which have shown that the main effect of being pioneers in a market promises superior performance in terms of market share and profitability than the late movers, Luo (1997) and other researchers have found out that the effect of the first mover may be conditional and will depend on the mode of strategy that is used (Isobe, & Montgomery, 2000). There are different strategies that MNCs can use to enter new foreign markets; they include exporting, licensing/franchising, full ownership and joint ventures. The mode of exporting entails a company selling its physical products which are usually manufactured outside the...
Dicken believes that most TNCs are capitalist enterprises driven by profit. He argues that they are the primary movers and shapers of the global economy with the power to easily control or coordinate production networks across the world. In chapter four Dicken challenges a view that with time TNCs are going to abandon their country of origin, and take over the smaller weaker firms.
Multinational enterprise (MNE) is “a company that is headquartered in one country but has operations in one or more other countries” (Rugman and Collinson 2012, p.38) that has at least one office in different countries but centralised home office. These offices coordinate global management in the context of international business. MNEs have increasingly essential influence on the development of the global economy and coordinate with other companies in different business environments. However, there are many issues involved with how MNEs operate well overseas, especially in emerging markets (EMs) (Cavusgil et al., 2013, p.5).
Most of the countries today liberalised their economies & opened to the rest of the world. These changes in policies attracted the MNCs to extend operations to...
...MENT ENCOURAGEMENT OF GLOBAL BUSINESS FOREIGN GOVERNMENT ENCOURAGEMENT Governments also encourage foreign investment. The most important reason to encourage investment is to accelerate the development of an economy. An increasing number of countries are encouraging investments with specific guidelines toward economic goals. MNCs may be expected to create local employment, transfer technology, generate export sales, stimulate growth and development of the local industry. US GOVENRMENT ENCOURAEMENT The US government is motivated for economic as well as political reasons to encourage American firms to seek opportunities in the countries worldwide. It seeks to create a favorable climate for overseas business by providing the assistance by providing the assistance that helps minimize some of the troublesome politically motivated financial risks of doing business abroad.
Firstly, multinational corporations are not something new in this 21st century. There are more and more international corporation as people try to boost the process of globalization. The development of these multinational corporations depends on the management of the owners. Transnational strategy is needed in order to operate such a big system of companies. Every nation in this system has to be managed thoroughly in order to help running the corporation, as well as to keep the system as one consistent body of business. Managers also find it important to look for opportunitie...
Mira Wilkins defines a multinational enterprise (MNE) as a “firm that extends itself over borders to do business outside its headquarters country.” By 1870, a period denoted as industrial capitalism, MNCs started to evolve and the nature...
...ll as private sectors have gone international with new ventures outside the country. These companies are generating revenue, though modest compared to their overall sales revenue, by deputing their expert personnel outside.
Modern society is dominated by multinational corporations. In the past 30 years there has been unprecedented development of transnational corporations (TNC), which is “any corporation that is registered and operates in more than one country at a time” (Transnational). Now, there are more than 63,000 TNCs, while there were only 7,000 in 1970. That is more than 900% growth in TNCs in only a few decades. Even more startling, 70% of all trade, includes at least one of these TNCs (Basic).
Smith, M. H. (2006). The natural advantage of nations: business opportunities, innovation and governance in the 21st century. Earthscan.
.... Much wider and much deeper dialogue is needed between those with a stake in economic prosperity from all three sectors about how to mitigate these adverse effects without undue harm to the economic benefits produced by the market. Exploration of alternative solutions, experimentation and, ultimately, adoption of new approaches and policies are required. Civil society finances its expanded participation in social development and in cross-sector working partnerships through self-generated revenues from earned income, user fees and philanthropic contributions, along with the revenue sharing with government and new contributions from the private sector. The private sector contributes its additional funds, as well as human resources and expertise, by participating in the cross-sector collaborative projects that are co-financed by the public sector and by civil society.
Stonehouse, G., Campbell, D., Hamill, J. & Purdie, T. (2004). Global and Transnational Business (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.