Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the role of government in business
The role of government in business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the role of government in business
Introduction
The concern for privatisation of public sector enterprises has been taken as the “new adjustment measures” since the recession in the early eighties (Gouri et. al., 1991). The definition of privatisation varies depending on one’s perspective. One would normally define privatisation as the selling of government assets to the private sector as the government is no longer able to finance or to produce the goods and services.
Economically, it is defined as a ‘process that aims at reducing involvement of the state or the public sector in the nation’s economic activities’ (ibid). According to Thynne and Ariff (1989), privatisation “does not necessarily mean the full transfer of public functions to the private sectors” and “lack of interest” of the government, but as “initiatives designed to alter the balance between the public and private sectors” (Cook & Kirkpatrick, 1988).
This report contains an elaboration of the term privatisation, type of privatisation and a little bit of the history. Then it will be narrowed down to the privatisation policy in Brunei Darussalam and government agencies that had undergone the process. Thus, main content of this report will be on the case study of the potential to be privatised government agency in Brunei - Department of Electrical Services (DES).
Government as the Owner of Industry and Privatisation
Government has been seen as “the owner of industry or a producer of goods” (Connolly & Munro, 1999). But being the absolute owner could bring a negative aspect to the industry such as crowding out of private sector (Lawrey as cited in EDPSGO, 2005). The reasons for the crowding out are due to:
1. Legislated monopoly
2. State-owned-enterprises get preferential treatment from government...
... middle of paper ...
...sector may cause them to lose these, and even worse, retrenchment is highly possible. As a profit-maximising enterprise, cutting costs will be its main concern. So, services of employees who are considered to be not performing are most likely to be discontinued.
Conclusion
Privatisation of the electricity sector may be the best way out to increase its efficiency as the power provider. However, the government will need to consider the drawback that consumers may face especially in the pricing policy where high prices may be charged to them. The inequality of distribution in the delivery of the service also should be taken in to consideration. Therefore, public-private partnership could be another option for the government to ensure efficiency of the enterprise as well as having a significant control over it so that the welfare of the people will not be put a stake.
Municipal control or an alternative delivery method? This is the question that has intrigued all levels of local government and created intense debates between taxpayers across municipalities. The services that municipalities provide are often vital to the existence of a local area. The issues of accountability, cost savings, quality of service and democracy often arise when choosing the best options to deliver services to a municipal area. In recent years the concepts of privatization, alternative service delivery and public-private partnerships are often promoted as ways cut down on overburdened annual city budgets and promote a higher quality of service to citizens. Municipalities have historically always provided basic services such as fire protection, water purification/treatment and recreational facilities. However, would private companies or another municipality be able to better deliver the same services more efficiently or at a lower cost? The city or town often provides a political grass roots approach to most local problems. Municipalities are better positioned and have a wider scope to provide services to their constituents in order to ensure quality of service that does not erode accountability and transparency, or drive the municipality deeper into debt.
Lindblom poses that the market entraps government because it fears the fall out of poor market function and the unemployment that it would create. The officials understand that the economy, at a basic level, is something that everyone can understand and that when it is doing poorly, they are in danger of losing their “privileged position”. According to Lindblom,
2008, p. 144); in other words, the privatisation is a policy run and controlled by the government, this privatisation movement was based on human rights, control of prices and the regulations of the health services and social care in order to promote better outcomes and better standards of care.
Peratta, Ed. ?Despite bumps in the road, privatization races on.? American and City and County Oct 1995: 50.
Privatization of governmental functions has a direct relationship with the number of contract employees in government and an inverse relationship with the number of civil servants. As privatization has become more acceptable, contract employees are being hired to do the jobs, thus, replacing civil servants.
There is no individual owner in the Public Sector. Advantages: · Their main aim is to provide a service, not to make a profit · They will still run even if there is few people using the service · Government is in a good position to plan the overall provision for the country Disadvantages: · It is difficult to motivate employees in an impersonal business such as this · The tax payer has to meet higher tax payments if the business makes a loss · The running of the business can be politically influenced. Private Sector These are businesses owned and run by private people. To start a business in the Private Sector, they have to raise their own capital in order to pay for rent, stock, machinery etc. Some of these businesses can be small and owned and run by one person, other businesses can be larger and run by a group of people.
Over the last 10 years, there has been an accelerating global trend towards the execution of major public infrastructure projects on a privatized basis. Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) financing modalities, with the capability of
This forced people unable to acquire their water from local sources to buy cisterns. The other problem is that the privatized water company’s prices needed to be checked by other competing companies and or paired with strict regulations by the government. Since neither happened, the company impoverished already poor communities and competing companies did not drive the price down, because there were no other companies. Whether or not we are receiving our water from private corporations, municipal supplies, or our local co-operative, governments must have a strict plan to regulate the
Nightingale, Demetra Smith and Pinus, Nancy. "Privatization of Public Social Services: A Background Paper". 1997. Internet http://www.urban.org/pubman/privatiz.html
In order to infuse greater degree of efficiency in their working and to bring about more accountability in their performance, the extent of disinvestment differed for each of these 3 categories. The Government decided to disinvest up to 74% and retain only a maximum of 26% in Non - Core Industries, This encouraged private participation in public sector management, infusing efficiency into the enterprise working.
... Public sector... being engaged in the providing sevices (and in some cases goods) whose scope and variety are determined not by the direct wishes of the consumers, but by the the decisions of government bodies.
Sclar (2000) provides a simple definition of privatization as the process of providing public services and goods that will be managed by private entities. While this definition leans more on the transfer of ownership and changes in the mechanism of distribution, this also pushes for issues regarding efficiency and quality. Arguments on which entity should control the public resources also come with the question of who handles it more effectively. As this issue involves the public sector and how the government will run the nation’s resources, the common notion in the process of privatization as the way of earning revenues of private companies create concerns to the public of the real interests behind this move. In analyzing this subject, considering certain conditions is necessary to understand the potential benefits and risks of going through this step.
Traditional public administration is traced back to the works of scholars like Max Weber, Woodrow Wilson and Fredrick Taylor. This form of administration was mostly influenced by Max Weber with his bureaucratic model and theory. Max Weber was a well-known sociologist born in Germany in the year 1864. He came up with his bureaucratic model as a way to trying of improve management in organizations.
According to Sapru R.K. (2008) p370-371 the traditional ideal of public administration which inclined to be firm and bureaucratic was based on processes instead of outcomes and on setting procedures to follow instead of focusing on results. This paradigm can be regarded as an administration under formal control of the political control, constructed on a firmly ranked model of bureaucracy, run by permanent and neutral public servants, driven only by public concern. In emerging nations the administration was true bureaucracy meaning government by officers. In this perspective Smith (1996) p235-6 perceived that“the bureaucracy controls and manages the means of production through the government. It increases chances for bureaucratic careers by the creation of public figures,demanding public managers, marketing boards.
The third reason for privatisation was to develop resourcefully working markets. Welfare economics (Ofcom, 2011) argues that efficiency is achieved during a competitive market, so if competition is promoted then privatisation can be vital to efficiency effects. "Liberalisation and deregulation should be possible in order to have an efficient private sector and the cause for this is due to the initially nationalised enterprises are frequently monopolies," (Affuso, 2009, p. 222). So one can assume that some nationally governed monopolies were privatised and turned into private monopolies such as water, gas, utilities and railways.