Privatization Of Water Essay

Inequalities in wealth and standards of living have always been quite different around the world. With development, this could change. Clean, accessible water is a marker for a town’s standard of living, and countries around the globe have different methods for providing water to their citizens. Water privatization grows more popular globally, and its negative effects can be evaluated in places like Bolivia. In Cochabamba, Bolivia, the Water War gives depth to the world water crisis and how private ownership of water can harm citizens. From this war, we learn that water is destined to be redefined, the distribution of water has to be dealt with on a case by case basis, and the government needs to be compelled to keep themselves or other companies

Corporations attempt to own as much of a commodified resource as possible, and this happened to water when countries define it as a commodity. Corporations buying and selling a finite resource every human needs can cause serious adverse effects. When something is so precious that no one can live without it, companies can easily ruin the lives of people involved, specifically lower income families and poor countries. It is difficult to treat water as a human right as well. Historically, human rights referred to protections ensured and guaranteed to be available, such as life and liberty. These rights are typically to protect citizens from the government or one another. Water does not need to be protected from others, but rather available to all. This statement, however, is too vague to create water regulations. We need to further define availability. In various areas, the government doesn’t provide water, but people can buy or acquire it locally, and it is difficult to decide whether this means water is available there. The best solution would be to define water as available to all for a similar price. Water and its distribution, for these reasons, are much too complicated to fall under a category with other

This forced people unable to acquire their water from local sources to buy cisterns. The other problem is that the privatized water company’s prices needed to be checked by other competing companies and or paired with strict regulations by the government. Since neither happened, the company impoverished already poor communities and competing companies did not drive the price down, because there were no other companies. Whether or not we are receiving our water from private corporations, municipal supplies, or our local co-operative, governments must have a strict plan to regulate the