Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of motivation on employees performance
Effect of motivation on employees performance
Effect of motivation on employees performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of motivation on employees performance
When choosing to work in public or private sector companies there are many factors to consider? Do you want to work with a company that only considered the factors of its company or do you prefer to work for a company that have employee compensation? These factors are considerably important. Based on empirical studies one of the determining reason about private sector is that it compensation is based on the company cash profits and tax avoidance rather than value of the executive compensation. In my report I support my findings of several researchers: (Tafkov, 2009), (Reda & Schmidt, 2014), and (Clausen, 1999). Researcher findings from James Reda and David Schmidt based on severance considerations and the history of severance pay. The History of Severance Pay goes back to more than 60 years. According to James Reda and David Schmidt “it is very uncommon for CEOs to have agreements with their respective companies.” Second researcher is Paul Clausen the difference between executive compensation and a business value. A company value is based on the compensation of their business. Whenever compensation is high, the lower the profits and accumulated assets associated with the value of the company. In this report the literature review will further tell you the how private and public sector differences and the factor associated with each sector, the elements of executive compensation vs. value. The gap in the literature is why employee compensation differs from executive compensation, determining reasonable in executive compensation or business value, and the determinant of executive compensation in private firms. The methodology report will show how relative performance information (RPI) on feedback from employee performance when inc... ... middle of paper ... ...mpensation is based on independent peer performance. (Tafkov, 2009) uses the RPI model in a team based approach on effort and performance. Works Cited Clausen, P. T. (1999). Executive compensation or business value. ACA News 42.3 , 25-25. Gomez-Mejia, L. M.-K. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46 , 226-237. Kvaal, E., & Langli, J. C. (2011). Determinants of Executive Compensation in Private Family Firms. SSRN Working Paper Series . Masuda, B., & Barens, K. (2004). Innovative Trends in Private Companies. Workspan 47.9 , 24-30. Reda, J. F., & Schmidt, D. M. (2014). Private Company: Severance Considerations. (S. Reda, Ed.) Financial Executive 30.1 , 55-60. Tafkov, I. (2009). Private and public relative performance information under different incentive systems.
Mujtaba, B. G., & Shuaib, S. (2010). An Equitable Total Rewards Approach to Pay for Performance Management. Journal of Management Policy and Practice vol. II (4), 111-121.
The above examples of pay show that the more skills, experience employees are with the organization the more they are compensated. Organizations would benefit by utilizing the same practice’s Disney extends to their workforces. For those businesses whose primary purpose of their plan is to only meet compliance requirements could greatly benefit by developing a comprehensive benefit plan. This could help increase their return on investment. The value I believe a business may gain from Disney’s compensation plan is to appeal to competent workers, to maintain those workers, and to motivate workers to direct their energies towards achieving the goals of the organization. Companies can set up policies to conduct a market study on a regular basis to implement a real performance appraisal system and then work on retaining good employees and elimination of poor performing workers. By following Disney’s lead of in obtaining those who best fit their company’s culture and supporting the company’s Mission. To guarantee that the pay structure is externally competitive, a pay survey should be shown. The results of a survey to be valid, the market pay data must be from the relevant labor market for each benchmark job. I would advise that a survey of regional and global pay data should be collected from the company, because for example, most of the office support, HR and operations jobs will be filled by local applicants. A job analysis is the procedure of reviewing jobs in an alike business. The result of this process is a job description “that includes the job title, a summary of the job tasks, a list of the essential tasks and responsibilities, and a description of the work context “(Burke, 2008). A job description consists of the knowledge, skills and aptitudes necessary to do the job. A job evaluation is the process of adjudicating the comparative value of job within a company
The company Steel Co, which has been established for around 30 years, has been in a steady decline during the current recession and although a Divisional Director has been employed by the owner the fortunes of the company have not improved. The staff is unhappy, unproductive and unimpressed by the Human Resource system that currently exists in the company. The pay structure that currently exists within the organisation has been much debated among employees who feel it is unsatisfactory. The Business Adviser will research Performance and Reward management tools in order to help the company develop a more suitable Performance and Reward system to use. A variety of sources will be used in order to evaluate the system and tools against other organisational frameworks. The pay structure within the company will also be looked at in order to identify any possible changes that could be made.
Imagine being in a world where people are paid in cash bonuses, stock options, or generous severance pay when fired from their job due to a company merger, are asked to leave, or choose to retire. This happens to be a reality for many CEO’s and top executives of companies. We live in an economy where mergers and take over’s have become common, and to allow this option for the highest paid employees of a company is arguably unfair. While researching golden parachutes, I formed questions due to the circumstances surrounding this executive option. For example, why should CEO’s, who live very comfortably, be given a compensation package for losing their position due to a company merger or retirement when employee and shareholder’s futures are at stake? Is it fair for the rich to get richer when numerous employees below top executives are dealt the same fate from a merger and shareholders’ investments are at risk but neither receive a form of additional compensation? Of course, there’re those who support the issuance of golden parachutes, arguing they can persuade a possible company merger to not take place due to the costs associated with a top executives golden parachute package. Another supporting point for golden parachutes is, they can make it easier for higher up executives, like CEO’s be absorbed into the future merged company. I will be addressing the point of whether CEO’s and other executives deserve to be awarded a Golden Parachute option by their company. As well as a brief background of Golden Parachutes and my stance on them. They’re a very important part of our growing economy and will always be considered in a merger/takeover if awarded to executives.
CEO compensation has been a heated debate for many years recently, and it can be argued that they are either overpaid or that there payment is justified by the amount of work they do and their performance. To answer the question about whether CEO compensation is justified it must be looked at by the utilitarian viewpoint where the good of many outweighs the good of one. It is true that many CEO’s are paid an exorbitant amount of money; however, their payment is justified by the amount of money that they bring back to the company and the shareholders. There are many factors that impact the pay that the CEO receives according to Shah et.al CEO compensation relies on more than just the performance of the CEO, there are a number of factors that play a rule in the compensation of the CEO including the fellow people who help govern the corporation (Board of Directors, Audit Committee), the size of the company, and the performance that the CEO accomplishes (2009). In this paper the focus will be on the performace aspect of the CEO.
Scarpello, V., & Jones, F.F. (1996). Why justice matters in compensation decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 285-299.
Performance related pay is a financial reward given to employees whose work is considered to have reached a required standard or is above average. “PRP criteria can relate to the individual employee, to work groups or to the organization as a whole” (Armstrong, 2002). It is fair to provide people with financial rewards as a means of paying them according to their contribution (Armstrong 1993:86). The primary purpose of performance related pay in any organization is to recruit, retain and motivate the workforce. It also helps in focusing employees’ minds on particular goals (Protsik, 1966); communicate to employees an organization’s core values, and change the culture of that organization (Kessler and Purcell, 1991).
Shaw, Jason, Delery, John, Jenkins, Douglas, Gupta, Nina (1998). An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 41, p.511.
Management spends a huge amount of time to design incentive systems and schemes to motivate their workers and to ensure they work in their best possible manner. Motivating workers by giving them decent pay helps in winning employees heart to make the work done efficiently, significantly and effectively. The most effective way to motivate people to work productively is through individual incentive compensation (Pfeffer, 1998). An attraction of getting more is a powerful incentive to people for high performance. While most people agree that money plays a major role in motivating people, in organizations there is a widespread belief that money may also have some undesirable effects on morale.
Attracting and retaining the most talented employees is essential for long-term organizational success. An important component to attracting and retaining such employees is the design and implementation of an effective compensation and benefit system. Assuming the role of a highly regarded human resource consultant hired to review, analyze, and revise the compensation and benefit system utilized by my city’s largest employer, Holland Enterprises, this paper presents a revised compensation and benefit strategy that suits the firm. This proposal describes how an effective compensation and benefit system could contribute to organizational effectiveness in the firm, the principle components of the revised compensation and benefit system for the
Formalized compensation goals serve as guidelines for managers to ensure that wage and benefit policies achieve their intended pur¬pose. The more common goals of compensation policy include to reward employees’ past performance, to remain competitive in the labor market, to maintain salary equity among employees, to motivate employees’ future performance, to maintain the budget, to attract new employees, and to reduce unnecessary turnover. It is important for the organ...
Hiring and firing are some of the most sensitive areas in human resource management worldwide. Due to their potential in affecting both the performance of other employees and the public image of a company, they should be handled with utmost care. According to the 'Lectric Law Library (2011), there are high chances of conflicts between an employer and an employee at the termination of a contract by an employer. Therefore, when an employee has to be fired, this should be done in a professional manner, with the authority doing the firing having involved human resource personnel. The employee should be provided with the reason for dismissal, and proper documentation of the termination should be made.
Nonetheless, those who are not direct members of the family can also handle a family business. Family members are frequently taking active involvement in the business operations, and members of the family tend to take up top positions within the organization, but this is dependent on the succession strategy within the business. Some family businesses turn into public companies in order t...
Organizations are working hard in today’s world of business, not only to remain competitive, but also to focus on stability and structure. Employees are the backbone of an organization. It is becoming more important to offer quality HRM programs to staff, in order to support the retention of trained and experienced staff. Employees have always been concerned with salary however, there is a new focus emerging that looks at compensation as a whole entity. Monetary wages are now just as important as other benefits such as paid time off, medical and dental offerings and retirement. This paper will discuss the importance of the total compensation program which includes many aspects, not just salary. Attention must be paid to equal pay, pay
Based on the past empirical studies, the salary level which is one of the components under the form of compensation has positive and fairly constant impact on the job satisfaction (Tremblay, Sire, &Pelchat, 1998). Moreover, type of payment systems has been examined by applying direct effects models in previous studies. The previous studies are using different sample of 2336 employees in a big public research organization, respondents from the 1988 wave of the US National Longitudinal Study of Youth and respondents from 9831 different in United Kingdom. The studies able to determine that properly design of levels of pay based on employees performance have increased job satisfaction (Ismail et al, 2011). Based on the means, standard deviation and correlation for compensation as a dimension for job satisfaction, it shows that there is a significant correlations for employer satisfaction through compensation (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) (Rice, 2009).