Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concltion about hipaa
Privacy and confidentiality for patients
Concltion about hipaa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concltion about hipaa
Once the chief of the survey office signs the business associate agreement, the surveyors will be aware of the protected health information that the privacy officer is disclosing. The surveyors must agree to protect the disclosed information, they must also agree to not share the private information, and they must not let unauthorized persons access to the information.
Paragraph 2
The patient’s family members violated the Privacy Act of 1974, which provides the patient with privacy rights. They violated the act by bringing cameras to record what treatment was given to the patient. Even though the family is related to the patient, they still had to abide and respect the privacy rules of HIPAA so the patient could receive further treatment
The flip side of the signing a confidentiality document under HIPAA policy healthcare officials many times has been frustrated because bounds they can’t cross. Many times family or friends who aren’t authorizes obtains valuable medical information are coming all hours of the day to ask for critical medical reason, the nurses, physicians and others officials bid my law not to get out information on the telephone, or in personal if the individual or individuals name aren’t on the privacy document. Having a ...
According to the report provided by the consultant, the employees at this facility were not taking precautions in safeguarding the patient’s health information. Therefore, the employees at this facility were in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). It is important for employees to understand the form of technology being used and the precautions they must take to safeguard patient information.
This case presents a very delicate situation that presents many legal and ethical questions. Do you tell your brother his partner has HIV? I would tell my brother, but the how and when, may vary based on circumstance. From a professional ethical standpoint, it would be unethical to disclose the patient’s HIV status without consent. It would violate the patient’s right to confidentiality, as it is the patient’s choice whom information may be shared with (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 50). It could also be argued that it is a violation of the principle of nonmaleficence. By providing the patient’s HIV status to people unbound by HIPAA, you are putting the patient at risk of discrimination. This could cause mental anguish or psychological issues, therefore, in essence, inflicting harm on the patient. The most valued application of nonmaleficence is, “One ought to not inflict harm” (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 42). This would outweigh the ethical argument that you are also preventing harm to your brother, another less important application of nonmaleficence (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 42). There is one professional ethical principle that I would argue was being applied. This being the principle of paternalism, stating that healthcare providers should do what they deem best for the patient according to their ability and judgment (Beemsterboer, 2010, p. 47). If the patient had a sexual encounter with the brother, and did not inform him of her HIV status, she may be arrested for reckless endangerment according to Pennsylvania law. A case where an HIV-positive person did not disclose their status to their sexual partner was brought before the Pennsylvania Superior Court. According to Pennsylvania law, “Disclosure of HIV status is a defense ag...
They were part of the healthcare team and went along with the beliefs of their team. The team should have directly included the patient and parents. I cannot help but wonder if this legal battle would never have taken place had an ethics committee been assigned to this case. Ethics committees provide structure and guidelines for potential problems, serve as an open forum for discussion, and function as a true patient advocate by placing the patient at the core of the committee discussions (Guido,
. HIPAA privacy rules are complicated and extensive, and set forth guidelines to be followed by health care providers and other covered entities such as insurance carriers and by consumers. HIPAA is very specific in its requirements regarding the release of information, but is not as specific when it comes to the manner in which training and policies are developed and delivered within the health care industry. This paper will discuss how HIPAA affects a patient's access to their medical records, how and under what circumstances personal health information can be released to other entities for purposes not related to health care, the requirements regarding written privacy policies for covered entities, the training requirements for medical office employees and the consequences for not following the policy.
Have you ever heard of the idea of body-mounted cameras on police officers? If not, David Brooks will introduce you to the idea that was discussed in an article from New York Times called “The Lost Language of Privacy”. In this article, the author addressed both the positive and negative aspects of this topic but mostly concerned with privacy invasion for Americans. Although that is a valid concern but on a larger scale, he neglected to focus greatly on the significant benefits that we all desire.
The Health and Accountability Act of 1996, also known as HIPAA is a law that enables the privacy and security of a patient’s medical record. Seeing as the time period of this movie was in the early seventies, not many laws were broken. One example of violation of HIPAA, if the events of this movie occurred today, would be when the nurses gave Patch information about the grumpy cancer patient, or any medical information about other patients. Another example, is the fact that Patch opened his illegal facility and practiced medicine out of it without being a real certified doctor. One last example is with Patch himself, although he was trying to thrive, he broke laws along the way. He stole the hospital’s medical supplies for his own facility, and that he took it upon himself to have contact with Dean Walcott’s patients before being in his third year of medical
When confidential patient information is disclosed without consent it is a violation of the HIPAA Title II Security Rule. This rule was enacted in response to private information being leaked to the news and emails containing privileged information were read by unauthorized people. Identity theft is a real concern so patient privacy should be taken seriously. This is a rule can easily be broken without the offender feeling any malice towards the victim for example gossip and curiosity. Gossip in a medical office can have devastating effects on a health care facility’s reputation. Employees engaging in idle chatter to pass the time can inadvertently be overheard by patients or family members. Simply not using the patient’s name may not be enough if the person overhearing the conversation sees the resemblance. Professional behavior should be exercised at all times and juvenile behavior such as spreading gossip, has no place in a business that relies on its credibility. This rule will impact the way patient medical records are handled because we know the seriousness of it. Hospitals that don’t enforce HIPAA rules will have negative repercussions. The patient can have irreversible damage done to their view on the medical field and that hospital if their information is not treated with care. They may even feel so violated that they bring litigation against the hospital.
Some of the things that HIPAA does for a patient are it gives patients more control over their health information. It sets boundaries on the use and release of health records. It establishes appropriate guidelines that health care providers and others must do to protect the privacy of the patients’ health information. It holds violators accountable, in court that can be imposed if they violate patients’ privacy rights by HIPAA. Overall HIPAA makes it to where the health information can’t b...
6. Should individuals and organizations with access to the databases be identified to the patient
I upheld the ANA code of Ethics by keeping my patient’s health information private by whenever I finished using EPIC that I would close out the screen so that no one could see the information. I made sure that I would promote safety for my patient such as when ambulating her to go on a walk, I would use a gait belt to help insure her safety. While walking along with my patient, she would talk about wanting to leave and knowing the way out; from what she had said I made sure that I would help her walk near the door to the hallway and back to her room. To
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA), Confidential Information and Statistical Efficiency Act (CIPSEA), and the Freedom of Information Act all provide legal protection under many laws. It also involves ethical protection. The patient must be able to completely trust the healthcare provider by having confidence that their information is kept safe and not disclosed without their consent. Disclosing any information to the public could be humiliating for them. Patient information that is protected includes all medical and personal information related to their medical records, medical treatments, payment records, date of birth, gender, and
The privacy of the individual is the most important right. Without privacy, the democratic system that we know would not exist. Privacy is one of the fundamental values on which our country was founded. There are exceptions to privacy rights that are created by the need for defense and security.
Being a health services administrator under an oath that I have taken and under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, I may not comment on the current situation. “HIPAA was designed to protect the privacy, confidentiality and security of patient information” (Pozgar, 2016, pg. 245). Allowing for any of this information to come out would just give media a story in which they will most likely slander anyone in sight.
The sixth ethical issue arises when the client is denied access to his medical chart. Currently, HIPPA (2006) grants clients access to their medical records. An exception to this is if the information contained within the medical records is “reasonably likely” to cause harm to the client (HIPPA, 2006; APA, 2002). The records were unlikely to cause harm to the patient and, therefore, the client should have had access to them.