Primary Sources In Bernard Rosenthal's Salem Story

1577 Words4 Pages

Bernard Rosenthal’s Salem Story was written as a way to break the common assumptions made by the General public. Rosenthal writes as a way to share his findings that the story goes past hat we think we know about the Salem Witch Trials. Salem Story: Reading the Witch Trials 1692 will aid my future research paper by adding a broad explanation of the Salem Witch Trials. This book goes into factual details of the events as well as the opinion and references from professionals on the topic. Rosenthal wrote Salem Story to explain the real reason the Salem Witch Trials began. At Bringhamton University Rosenthal is a English professor who specializes in the Salem Witch Trials. At the university he has resources to study the trials, and with his Ph.D he has been through the schooling that it takes. He teaches courses based on Salem, so he has the background to write a book analyzing the events. Throughout the book Rosenthal brings primary sources and other sources that explain the Salem Witch Trials into the light and uses them to support his arguments. He also examines other sources that cannot be used to explain his theories, …show more content…

According to evidence nine people were condemned on September 22, 1692, and of those nine four people were spared because of their confessions. Rosenthal believes that they might have “intuited that holding to confession remained the safer course even though it risked unfavorable terms with eternity.” (Rosenthal 158) This is not a method that is unfamiliar with trials today. Sometimes the better option is to simply go with what the court already “knows” that you did. With accusers and investigators yelling at you from all around the courtroom confessing may not seem like the worst idea. Rosenthal writes that some of the people who were persuaded into a confession underwent so much pressure that they actually started to believe that they were a

Open Document