Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pricing strategy
Pricing strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pricing strategy
Have you ever wondered why do prices end with .99 or why it is that business are always making some kind of deal? Are these deals as beneficial as the customer thinks they are? What about the items priced higher than usually. Most people tend to think the higher the price the better quality right? Well, these are some of the topics this paper is going to help you better understand. Price points, Prestige Pricing, and Odd-evening pricing are all common price games used in the business world today. Price points are the different prices stores use to manipulate the consumers into buying what they want them to buy. I am sure everyone has wondered exactly what goes into the pricing of the items they purchase or what is it about these deals that keep luring me into the stores. Price gaming is a tricky business and businesses love how well it can manipulate the customer into believe and thinking a certain way. Showing you these three common price games will help you better understand and help you evaluate your purchasing decisions a little better.
Picture this. You enter a furniture store looking to purchase a bed. There is an option to purchase a bed for $300 and the chest of drawers for $100. The other option is to get the "bundle deal" that includes the bed and the chest of drawers for $350. The manager that creates the prices is hoping that the buyer goes for the "bundle option" because in the mind of the buyer he or she is shopping smarter and saving $50 through that deal. However, the manager has only created two ineffective price options to manipulate the buyer into buying the bundle deal. Is it fair to try to manipulate consumers into purchasing certain items? Many critics argue against the psychological pressures of price poin...
... middle of paper ...
... the consumer purchase an item because he or she believes that money is being saved. In one study it was found that pricing can tremendously help retailers in increasing their sales through pricing. In the study "when the price of margarine dropped from 89 cents to 71 cents at a local grocery chain, sales improved by 65%. But when the price fell two cents more to 69 cents, sales jumped by an astounding 222%! " (Lindstrom, 2012) Price points may be more helpful to retailers but they can also be detrimental. For example, consumers may become thrifty shoppers or bargain shoppers due to pricing; hence, some consumers may abandon the retailer's brand and look for "the best price rather than the best value." (Kay, 2013) For the most part, retailers benefit more from pricing methods versus consumers. However, there are benefits for consumers as well through pricing methods.
Setting prices too high would discourage purchasing and setting prices too low negatively affects revenue. While several pricing strategies exist, the use of a value-based pricing system, as implemented at Cabela’s, offers an optimal strategy that meet both customer expectations and company requirements.
Consumers would lose-out from increased competition in the short-run, however in the long-run consumers would ultimately benefit from increased competition. High levels of competition prevent businesses from abusing their market power, such as setting prices above or below what a perfectly competitive market would dictate to be at equilibrium and also encourages businesses to be innovative instead of becoming complacent, relying on consumer’s lack of choices.
Price is how much to sell your products for. This is based on your cost and product value to potential customers. I believe that price is important and you will definitely attract customers with the lure of cheap prices, especially at Christmas time. How many people just recently woke up at 4 a.m. just to get in line for several hours so they could get a great deal and save a few dollars? I believe that it works to motivate certain customers, but there are still consumers out there who are not interested getting stampeded during a price reduction sale.
The law of demand tells us that "Quantity demanded rises as price falls, other things constant, or alternatively, quantity demanded falls as price rises, other things constant (McGraw 2004). The XBOX 360 phenomenon that took place in 2005 is a good example of this economic principle at work. Microsoft's XBOX 360 gaming console was released into the U.S. market on November 22nd 2005. The release came after a great deal of advertising and media hype that ensured that the demand for the product would outweigh the supply. Quite simply, there were more consumers wanting to purchase the product than there was product available. The retail price for the gaming system with a hard drive was $399. Many consumers, however, paid a great deal more than the $399 sticker price to acquire the system. On the morning of the U.S. release, retailers across the nation sold out of the product within just a few hours of opening their doors to consumers. In the weeks that followed however, many consumers purchased the unit from sellers on on-line auction sites and even from individuals in parking lots for as much as $1500. The reason for this was that the supply was significantly less than the demand for the product. In some cases, parents who wanted to ensure that their children received and XBOX 360 for Christmas in 2005 were willing to pay well over retail for the hard-to-acquire system. In other cases, video gaming enthusiasts wanted to be among the first individuals to own and play the system. News reports across the nation showed footage of people lining up days ahead of November 22nd in order to secure a place in line at retailers that would have the product available on the release date.
Price gouging is increasing the price of a product during crisis or disaster. The price is increased due to temporal increase in demand while supply remains constrained. In many jurisdictions, price gauging is widely considered as immoral and is illegal. However, from a market point of view, price gouging is a correct outcome of an efficient market.
Wal-Mart’s everyday customers do not want inflation of price to occur due to the infamous “rollback” scheme. At first glance, Wal-Mart's "rollback" pricing scheme seems appealing however, while the strategy drew in some shoppers with lower prices on select items, it was combined with a rise in prices on many other goods. This is severely aggravating for all customers who embraced Wal-Mart for its "everyday" low prices on all merchandise. This is a prime example of how this massive retailer deceives its customers into shopping at Wal-Mart (Lake, Mermin, and Wiefek 10).
Consumers may not understand why retailers offer buy-one-get-one free promotions even though it’s no better for the consumers. Economist Alex Tabarrok has argued that “the success of this promotion lies in the fact that the price actually takes into account the fact that two items are being sold.” This strategy ...
Price discrimination is a significant and influential practice on the market in the modern economic world. It aids in a firm's profit maximization scheme, it allows certain consumers with more scarce resources the opportunity to purchase goods or services that would otherwise be usable, and it aids firms in balancing what is and what is not sold. Price discrimination is an effective means by which a firm can sell a higher quantity of goods, make a higher profit margin on the goods it sells, and builds a broader consumer base due to differing price elasticity of demand for given goods and services. Price discrimination ultimately equalizes price and value for both the consumer and the firm, creating a more ideal situation for both entities in terms of preference and opportunity cost.
For commodity goods, consumers are more inelastic to price changes. As commodities are at affordable price, the price differences are rather small. Therefore, lowest price is not a main concern for most consumers.
In sum, we are surrounded by anchors everywhere and we all clutch to them. The “recommended retail price” printed on many products is nothing more than an anchor. Sales professionals know they must establish a price at early stage – long before they have an offer. (Rolf Dobelli “The act of thinking clearly”) The problem is that even being aware of its existence, we still can be victims of the anchoring bias. Some of the recommendations how to deal with this cognitive bias will be presented later in this paper.
Consumer can benefit in cheaper goods, when presented with two products that offer similar benefits, customers vote with their purchases and decide which product will survive. Customers also determine the ultimate price point for a product, which requires producers to set product prices high enough to make a profit, but not so high that customers will hesitate to make a purchase.
...can be key in improving customer sales. If a customer does not see the value of an organization's product, that customer may begin to shop for a competitor's product based only on price. Price is not the only competitive advantage an organization may have, but if it is not able to articulate the non-price value, it can significantly lower the organization's competitive advantage.
Have you ever overpaid for something? I think we all have. Your money—practically wasted. Luckily, I can teach you how to put an end to the anguish and regret you feel when you find your wallet and your shopping bag practically empty. By taking advantage of promotions, shopping second-hand, and comparing prices, you can prevent yourself from making the mistake of blindly overpaying.
We compare two possible formats of the self-selected price bundling: (A) buy two items, get a discount on both items, where a discount is applied to the whole bundle; and (B) buy two items, get a discount on the cheaper item, where a discount is applied to part of the bundle. Between these two promotions, at any given price discount, the “discount on both items” promotion generates greater absolute savings (i.e., the absolute amount of money saved) than the “discount on the cheaper item” promotion. If consumers’ spending decisions are driven by the absolute savings, we should predict that consumers would spend more when offered the “discount on both items” promotion than the “discount on the cheaper item” promotion. However, we demonstrate in four experiments that consumers’ spending follows the opposite
Price Based Theories - This first theory focuses on the classification and study of the quality price relationship. And this led to the initial conceptualization of value as a cognitive tradeoff between perceptions of quality and sacrifice. As per this view the external ques influence product quality and value. Various instances so offered by Agarwal and Teas (2001, 2002, 2004); Dodds and Monroe (1985); Dodds et al. (1991); Grewal et al. (1998a); Li et al. (1994); Monroe (1979, 1990); Monroe and Chapman (1987); Monroe and Krishnan (1985); Oh (2003); Teas and Agarwal (2000); Wood and Scheer (1996) state the importance of price which does a bearing on the marketability of a