Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the disadvantages of price discrimination
Which of the following constitute price discrimination and which does not
What are the disadvantages of price discrimination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the disadvantages of price discrimination
In the business world, price discrimination can be detrimental to small businesses trying to compete with larger organizations pricing. In the 1930s congress was worried about large multimarket firms using predatory marketing techniques in certain markets to bankrupt smaller firms in the area. In response, Congress enacted the Robinson-Patman act which prohibits larger forms conducting pricing strategies that contribute towards becoming a monopoly by getting rid of their rivals, the smaller family owned stores. With this measure in place the smaller mom and pop stores are better protected from the larger chains and can help to contribute more to the local economy. A downside of the act from a consumer standpoint is that the larger chain firm …show more content…
Morton Salt, the FTC thought that the ability for the larger businesses to buy much more from wholesale producers such as Morton Salt, especially when Morton Salt had special discounts for firms that bought more product. The smaller firms could not compete and the commissioner found that it was monopolistic behaviour and put a stop to it. Another issue of ethics that presides in the study of price discrimination is that companies like morton salt are not very or at all transparent about the reasoning behind certain price discriminations. Companies do not actively state why certain products or services are more expensive for some customers and not others. In the journal article “The ethics of Price Discrimination” the authour Juan M. Elegido describes a common scenario in airline price discrimination tactics “The easiest way to spoil a plane trip is to ask your seatmate how much he/she paid for her/his ticket. You might well find that while you (or your employer) paid $1,100, your seatmate was making the same trip, with the same comfort, for only $180”. Why the vast difference? Only the airline knows for the most part, but they are not telling unless someone tried to dispute the price difference …show more content…
The effects and methods businesses use price discrimination are varied from gas stations pricing their gasoline at different prices according to the location and population demographic they are in, to the movie theatres pricing different tickets according to age group. In any industry if a business can capitalize and make better profits by conducting price discrimination they will. As discussed previously price discrimination is not necessarily a bad thing for the economy or consumers, the general public will be able to find the same or similar goods at lower prices by shopping at larger firms, which can help less fortunate families greatly considering the current economic situation. Those that find products which they frequently buy at lower prices will purchase these items in larger quantities than before raising profits for the business and helping the general
Price discrimination can be defines as when a firm offers an “individual good at different prices to different consumers” The Library of Economics and Liberty elaborates on its pricing strategy, stating Comcast offers different pricing depending on what features the consumer desires. For instance, the cable company will charge a higher price to a person who uses several services as part of their cable package. Conversely, the firm charges a very low price to someone who would “otherwise not be interested” , providing basic services at a minimum price. It takes advantage of the regulation imposed on the cable industry by offering the required basic package at seemingly attractive prices. Using this pricing system allows for it to attract different consumers whose maximum price they are willing to pay differs. Recently, Comcast attempted a new billing strategy by introducing a data usage cap. It essentially expanded on the company’s existing price discrimination method by charging customers according to how much data they used each month. Comcast also utilizes penetration pricing, where it offers its product at low prices to attract new consumers, later raising the prices once the customer is subscribed for a certain amount of time. Generally it claims the original prices were promotional only, lasting only a small amount of
Apart from Antitrust laws, there are several other laws that promote fair business practices. The Robinson-Patman Act prohibits price discrimination. This act ...
Many businesses used this new process to raise the price of their competitors. They did this by putting constraints on entry restrictions (Woods 1986). At the state level, other laws were put in place to support the Food and Drug Act mainly to help local and area producers who were and would be facing new nat...
The Article "Flanking in a Price War" discusses how an economic experiment and data were used effectively in the Quebec grocery industry. The beginning of the article gives some history of the industry, introduces the major participants, and describes how one firm in particular, Steinberg, used a price cutting strategy to became the dominant player for 30 years.
...e. A price gouger needs to charge more in order to avail the product or service. In the case of Raleigh, the roads to the town were not accessible due to fallen trees and rocks. An entrepreneur would need to cut the trees and remove the rocks in order to take the product there. People who do that need compensation for all the trouble they take to bring products to the market. The youths who brought ice to Raleigh town had to cut down trees in order to access town. Instead of selling ice as the “right price” of less than 2 dollars, the youths charged more than 8 dollars. The price provided just there right compensation for all their efforts. Banning price gouging led to serious suffering of the people because the little food left went bad causing even more losses. For a few dollars for the price of ice, Raleigh residents could have saved millions worth of food.
In the article “Disney Discovers Peak Pricing,” S.K. London explores the differences between price surging and price discrimination. Price surging is a system that is commonly known to be used by Uber. Uber claims that when demand goes up, price goes up along with it to make prices and demand proportionate (Diakopoulos). London states that an article published in Bloomberg claims that “Disney introduced surge pricing to its theme parks.” He counters Bloomberg’s claim by explaining that it is not actually surge pricing that Disney has introduced, but rather, price discrimination. Disney is not price surging, London argues that Disney is price discriminating, that is, capitalizing on high demand for entertainment when children/teens have no
According to Modern Principles: Microeconomics by Tyler Cowen, price discrimination is “the selling of the same product at different prices to different customers” (259). An important principle of price discrimination is, “if the demand curves are different, it is more profitable to set different prices in different markets than a single price that covers all markets” (Cowen, 261). In the summertime, it is easy for Disney to price discriminate and make their ticket prices higher. Demand during the summertime is higher than any other time due to many factors. The graph below shows a demand shift to the right because people have a “greater willingness to pay for the same quantity” (Cowen, 31).
Price discrimination involves sells and charging the same product or service to different consumers for different prices. The monopolist needs to use price discrimination to decrease the amount of consumer’s surplus and enhance more profits. Companies can charge different prices to different individuals not based on differences on the cost of production. It depends on several criteria.
Predatory pricing “is alleged to occur when a firm sets a price for its product that is below some measure of cost and forfeits revenues in the short run to put competitors out of business” (Sheffet p.163-164). The reason firms take the short term loss is because they hope to drive out competitors and raise prices to monopolistic levels. By doing this, they covered their short term loss to make even greater profits in the long term than they would have by not using predatory tactics (Sheffert). Predatory pricing became illegal under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. It has remained one of the more difficult allegations for prosecutors to prove, due to the complexity of determining the company’s actual intent and whether or not it the strategy is competitive pricing. According to Areeda and Turner, there are three ways to determine if a firm is implementing predatory pricing. First, a price above marginal cost is presumed lawful; second, a price below marginal cost is considered unlawful, except when there is strong demand; and third, average variable cost is considered a good proxy for marginal cost. This is a reason predatory pricing is still important today. The courts must decide whether or not companies are engaging in competitive prices for the good of the consumers or are using predatory tactics for the good of their own company. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the current legislation regarding predatory pricing, determining when there is predation in an industry and the cause and effect relationship it has on an industry.
Pricing is an important aspect of every business. Chief Financial Officer’s (CFO) use pricing to create financial projections, establish a break-even point, and calculate profit and loss margins (Power Point, 2005). It is the only element in the marketing mix that produces revenue. Price is also one of the most flexible elements of the marketing mix as it can be changed very quickly. This is usually done to beat competitor prices in an attempt to fix the product’s market value position very low (Anderson & Bailey, 1998). After all, high prices make it difficult to become the market share leader. The leading US retailer, Wal-Mart, is an expert at low product pricing as evident in 2004 with $250 billion dollars in sales to their 138 million weekly shoppers. However, they are also responsible for reducing prices so low that it drives specialty stores out of business. This is the effect Wal-mart has had on many toy stores and has almost closed the doors of the famous toy store Toys “R” Us Inc.
As we know, there are a lot of business types in the world. Each of the businesses has their own strategies to survive in this competitive business world. Economically, price discrimination is usually regarded as desirable, since it often increases the efficiency of an economy. In contrast, it often arouses strong opposition from a public. Like in this particular case, which is online price discrimination, a majority of consumers think that this kind of discrimination is illegal. Generally, discrimination has a very negative implication in our society, and various forms of it, which those based on age, gender, race and religion, are illegal. However, price discrimination is a pricing strategy that is widespread in the economy and to avoid negative
Price gouging is a very tricky to figure out if it should be legal or not. When the topic was first brought up I was unsure of my opinion. But after reading the articles, watching the videos, and the class discussion I have come to a decision. I think price gouging should be legal but it is morally wrong. If there was a natural disaster and everyone needs gas but there is a shortage of it there becomes a problem. If the gas company continues to sell the gas at the same price everyone will be rushing to get it. This would cause people to fill their whole tank of gas instead of just taking what they need to get where they are going and making the lines be very long until they have no more gas. The company would also be losing out on money they
Evaluate the view that wage differentials are only a reflection of differences in the marginal productivity of workers.
For the past three decades minimum wage has been seen to rise several times. Only helping some but more than anything harming most. So who are the ones feeling the effects? Certainly not the wealthy, it never is them, mainly it would be the working poor, unskilled and teenagers. Raising minimum wage would cripple the public even more than what it would actually help.
The first type of price discrimination, also called perfect price discrimination, occurs when a firm sets the single highest price that somebody is willing to pay for it, catching up the consumer surplus. The second consists in charging different prices according to the quantity bought by the consumer; generally the price tends to decrease as the quantity of the product increases. And the third and last price discrimination involves dividing the consumers in diverse markets and charging them with a different price (Gravelle, Rees, 2004, p. 194-204). In addition to that, the firms that price discriminate have to meet some conditions. First of all they have to be price makers, thus regulating the price as they want; secondly, the firm has to sell a good which is not going to be involved in further exchange at a higher price; as third and last consideration, the market needs to be well organized so as to classify the different categories of buyers according to their willingness to pay (Littenberg and Tregarthen 2009, p.