This article gave the results of a new poll showing Clinton with a 9-point lead over Trump in Ohio. The poll, taken Sunday night after the debate through Tuesday 7 p.m., was conducted by Bladwin Wallace University’s Community Research Center and is likely to raise some concerns as it shows a dramatic shift from the most recent polling in Ohio. This article spoke about the death of LAPD Nadine Hernandez, 44, who died at an area hospital after being found with a gunshot wound. Hernandez had been investigating sexual assault allegations on New York Knicks star Derrick Rose. The death is being investigated to determine whether it was a homicide or a death but as of now that information is unknown. This article explained the encounter between …show more content…
Stumpf stepped down after being put under fire over a supposed two million accounts that had been opened without customer consent. Stumpf created a long and respected banking career serving for Wells Fargo for 34 years and being credited with many savvy business moves. Although Stumpf has given up his banking job, he continues to sit on the boards at Target and Chevron continuing to earn a large …show more content…
The new design is made more aerodynamic with more power to deliver greater performance and space. With this new design and the estimated sales this could become Honda’s top-selling car. The model is to be produced in three different plants in North America to keep up with demand and ultimately skyrocket in sales. This article about lifelong Republican Linda Fogg and her group of Republicans voting for Clinton, expressed how they would be opposing Republican candidate Donald Trump this upcoming election. Clinton has now picked up a lead in Florida, a state Trump needs in order to claim victory. According to the article, Trump is facing a larger challenge in loosing voters than previously thought. This article referenced broadcaster Howard Stern and his decision not to resurface old tapes of interviews with Donald Trump. Stern feels that Trump is a loyal friend that did the show in an entertaining effort and finds it unfair to reveal the old tapes in a time when he is now being attacked. Though Stern has been a strong supporter of candidate Clinton he vows to remain loyal and refuses to stir up
There have been many, many court cases throughout the history of the United States. One important case that I believe to be important is the court case of Clinton v. New York. This case involves more than just President Bill Clinton, the City of New York; it involved Snake River Farmers’ as well. This case mostly resolves around the president’s power of the line item veto. In 1996 President Bill Clinton signed the Line Item Veto Act into law. This would allow the president to get rid of a part of a bill and not disapprove the entire bill. The first time that President Clinton used this power he used it to refine the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, he got rid of a part of the bill that waived the Federal Governments statutory right to get back or receive $2.6 billion in taxes that were levied by the City of New York. President Clinton also line item vetoed a section of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 this wouldn’t allow certain food processors and refiners to sell their stock to farmers to defer the recognition of capital gains. This is when the Snake River Farmers’ and City of New York went after Clinton for doing so this is where the case of Clinton v. The City of New York originated from. In this case there were constitutional issues that were raised, major arguments presented, and the final ruling from the Supreme Court.
Howard Stern is a radio personality, producer, actor, author, and is the self proclaimed “King of All Media”. Stern is widely known for “The Howard Stern Show”, which was aired on FM radio from 1986 to 2005, until it moved to Sirius XM Radio in 2006. Stern specific style of “shock jock” radio is what makes him so popular, taking him only four years to get his show nationally syndicated in 1986.
The beating of Rodney King from the Los Angeles Police Department on March 3, 1991 and the Los Angeles riots resulting from the verdict of the police officers on April 29 through May 5, 1992 are events that will never be forgotten. They both evolve around one incident, but there are two sides of ethical deviance: the LAPD and the citizens involved in the L.A. riots. The incident on March 3, 1991 is an event, which the public across the nation has never witnessed. If it weren’t for the random videotaping of the beating that night, society would never know what truly happened to Rodney King. What was even more disturbing is the mentality the LAPD displayed to the public and the details of how this mentality of policing led up to this particular incident. This type of ethical deviance is something the public has not seen since the civil rights era. Little did Chief Gates, the Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, and the LAPD know what the consequences of their actions would lead to. Moving forward in time to the verdict of those police officers being acquitted of the charges, the public sentiment spiraled into an outrage. The disbelief and shock of the citizens of Los Angeles sparked a mammoth rioting that lasted for six days. The riots led to 53 deaths and the destruction of many building. This is a true but disturbing story uncovering the ethical deviance from the LAPD and the L.A. riots. The two perspectives are from the Rodney King incident are the LAPD and the L.A. riots.
What she wants most is for the truth to come out and for her story to be heard.
Many of the upcoming November elections this year create much friction and competition between the candidates. The New York State Senate race between Hillary Clinton and Rick Lazio has proved to very close and heated. eEach candidate has strong views on issues and puts up a good debate about each one. Hillary Clinton is the Democrat and Rick Lazio is the Republican in this election. This is a very close race and the winner will determine many of New York’s views on future issues.
Perhaps one of the most interesting times in a president’s administration is during the end of his term in office. Having reached the ultimate goal in a politician’s career, a president no longer has to worry about public opinion or any of the other political give and takes that usually influence a politician’s actions. He is truly free to act as he pleases almost free of consequences. Bill Clinton’s final days in office certainly demonstrated this fact. Using the ultimate unchecked executive power of clemency Clinton issued over 140 pardons and thirty six sentence commutations. He protected over a million acres of land through the creation of six new national monuments. He also nominated nine new federal judges. Clinton also issued a number of executive orders during this time. Unlike most previous presidents who laid low during their last days in office, Clinton was in a flurry of activity trying to exert some last bit of influence from his office. The reasons for his actions are wide spread, ranging from political to personal. The results of his actions were extensive, affecting many situations in the American political and judicial realms. The final days of Clinton administration may be the most controversial of a presidency that was full of tumult and plagued by scandals.
The Supreme Court has had to rule on issues regarding Presidential immunity in a few cases. Three specifically have helped to set the precedent for how the court would interpret another case brought before the court. In Mississippi v. Johnson the ruling decided whether a president can have an injunction placed on him/her based on the carrying out of their executive duties. Next, in the case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the court ruled on whether a president can be personally sued for decisions they made while in office that violated established law. Lastly, in the case of Jones v. Clinton it was decided if a president could be granted immunity from a civil suit not in relation to his/her office, simply because of the importance of the presidency and the time necessary to dedicate to the job. These three cases involving Presidential immunity have shaped the way a court would interpret a case involving such if faced today.
Have you impacted the United States like Bill Clinton has? Bill Clinton was born on August 19, 1946 in a small town of Arkansas. His father died before he was even born. He was not raised to be religious, but at a very young age he was attending church every Sunday morning alone. Growing up he had to see his stepfather’s abusive behavior towards both his mother and step-brother. When he was 17 years old and attending school he got an invitation to meet President John F. Kennedy at the White House Rose Garden, that’s when he realized what he wanted his career to be. During the 1992 election, on November 3, he became the forty second president. Clinton’s reputation suffered dramatically from a scandal in his personal life. Although Bill Clinton had an affair while being President, he impacted the United States by eliminating the federal deficit and overseeing the strongest economy, managed to remake the images and operations of the Democratic Party, and reforming welfare and changing the environment.
In the midst of one of the most controversial presidential elections in history, both political parties are struggling to prove that their candidate is the best choice. Clinton and Trump’s disapproval ratings are very low, but one has to ask, is there really a lesser evil to choose from? While Clinton has had her own fair share of past discrepancies, Trump’s track record proves much more troublesome. Donald Trump has proven to be an untrustworthy presidential candidate because of his misogynistic actions, his racial bias, and his corrupt business history.
to a hotel where she was a waitress or something like that. He should then have
Trump had been affiliated with the Democratic party and The Independent party multiple times prior to joining the Republican party in 2011. He is currently running for the Republican presidential nomination for the 2016 election and has received tremendous polling results to this point in the campaign, most recently polling at 35% among probable Republican voters, 16% higher than the second place candidate. He has been criticized by the media for some of his promises, including building a wall on the Mexican border and a proposal to ban all Muslims immigrating to the United States amidst the growing threat of Islamic jihadist terrorism in the
The impeachment of Bill Clinton is one of the “weirdest episodes'; in our political history. He is the only elected President of the United States ever to be resulted in the passage of impeachment (Johnson was not elected, Nixon resigned to prevent impeachment). The reason for his impeachment is that he lied under the oath during the testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit, and to grand jury during Monica Lewinsky investigation. He even abused power and lied to the Congress in an attempt to cover up a series of indiscretions, which resulted in the passage of four articles of impeachment. These incidents later turned out to be a political soap opera and ended with Clinton’s presidency preserved, but it is a soap opera that many believed it could be prevent from happening.
After all the Honda Civic ranks as the best selling compact car in America. Why wouldn't it be? Being affordable, reliable, durable, safe, economical, compact and sporty, with low insurance rates, and not to mention achieving great gas mileage makes this car the best. This car has everything I look for when buying a new car and more.
Donald Trump, as you know, is one of the more popular candidates for the 2016 Presidential election. Republicans are out to make a statement and for the most part they believe that Trump is the way to go. Something that should scare people of other parties the most is Party-based voters, which means that Republicans will vote for Trump just because he has an “R” next to his name on the ballot.
Polls have a role in political campaigns and shaping government policies but recently the reliability of polls have come into question. The Republican polls provided the information to Presidential candidate Mitt Romney that he had a strong chance of winning key battle ground states. The polls showed "he had at least 267 out of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election" (Hoffman). When watching the election night returns the reality was Romney only received 206 Electoral College votes far away from the magic number needed to win or tie the national election. The candidate’s team used these polls and focused on states that showed a strong chance to gain votes. Romney focused his energy in Ohio and Pennsylvania, both states he eventually lost.