Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of family in childs socialization
Family structures and roles in contemporary
Introduction to family dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of family in childs socialization
Assignment 9: Power, Influence, and Decision-making in Families
It states in our textbook, “The concepts of family power, influence, and decision-making are interrelated” (Galvin, Braithwaite, & Bylund, 2014). I believe that statement or quote to be true after reviewing my own experiences in life and interviewing my parents as a couple on how power, influence, and decision-making are done in their relationship. It says in our book, “power is present in all human relationships and interactions. Power has been conceptualized as the ability (potential or actual) of an individual to change the behavior of other family members” (Galvin, Braithwaite, & Bylund, 2014). I asked the question, how you guys approach power in your relationship as a couple,
…show more content…
Their response was that they believe that it improves their relationship because each other are viewed as equals and treated as equals in the relationship. I believe that my parents have a syncratic relationship. It states in the textbook, “A syncratic relationship is characterized by much shared authority and joint decision-making, implies that each partner has a strong say in all important areas. In this relationship both partners may confer and make decisions together, with both partners having input and shared power” (Galvin, Braithwaite, & Bylund, 2014). Another reason I think that my parents have that type of relationship has to do with how they make decisions. According to my parents how they make decisions it is done by one of them bringing up an item to discuss and then they will talk about the item and make a pros and cons list and after they talked about it and weigh the options they will make the decision on the item jointly. I believe that my parents fall under the decision-making processes of consensus which in our book is defined as, “the most democratic decision-making process, involves discussion that continues …show more content…
When I asked my parents how they develop the strategies or approaches that they use they talked a lot about their family of origins and how their parents raised them and how their parents relationship was like influences a lot of things they do or don’t do in their relationship. The also mentioned that their friends relationship also influenced their strategies and approaches. Also mom mentioned that once they first got married my parents read a lot of books about relationships and that has helped shaped their relationship and how they react in situations, how the make decisions, and things related to power. My parents are high school sweethearts but they did break up for a while when they were both in college but neither of them had serious relationships during that time but something my dad talked about was that he learned that in relationships things have to be equal and things can’t be one sided or a person can’t have all the power. He also said that he learned that relationships are hard and that things will not always be good and that you have to be willing to change and compromise for the better of the relationship and if you really
You little tyrant king george off with your head.Since the Americans had a bad experience with one person having too much power they made a constitution that guarded against tyranny by, dividing power, making the branches able to check or limit each other, and dividing power between big and little states.
Can you imagine president controlling your life? The constitution use three different forms to make a group or a person from getting too much power on his hands. The are three types of power that each contusion have in order to keep power equal. One of them is Legislative Branch Congress “Can approve Presidential nominations”(Document C). It’s a example how governments try to keep power equal.
“My husband had this wonderful magnetic quality-this glow-he’d just point those incredible blue eyes at you and you’d feel like you were under a big hot sun or something…” (O’Brien 195). Many people described Paul Wade, John’s dad, as powerful and influential. So influential, in fact, a kid from John Wade’s class claims he “wish[es] he was my father” (O’Brien 67). Often, the words power and influence go hand in hand. However, these words possess two different meanings. According to the Oxford Learner’s dictionary, power is defined as “The ability to control people or things ” (Oxford Learner’s). While power is described as the ability to control, the term influential is defined as “The effect that somebody/something has on the way a person thinks or behaves or on the way that something works or develops” (Oxford Learner’s). Paul has little power over John; however, Paul’s indirect influence leaves a long lasting, negative impact on his son’s actions.
The dimensions of relationships are classified as: interdependence, ideology and conflict. It is said the more interdependent the couple is, “…the higher the level of companionship, the more time they spend together, and the more they organize their space to promote togetherness and interaction” (Berkowitz and Fitzpatrick 1964). Ideological matters like are viewed differently from individuals and couples. “The beliefs, standards, and values individuals hold concerning their relationship and family are a major factor guiding not only the interactions with the spouse but also the judgments individuals make about these interactions and their outcomes” (Berkowitz & Fitzpatrick 1964). Conflict distinguishes perception towards being open to conflict between individuals and couples. “Couples vary as to their willingness to engage in conflict and their degree of assertiveness with one another” (Berkowitz & Fitzpatrick
The power of executive privilege has been extremely controversial since basically the beginning of the United States as a democratic government. Many saw this power come into a greater public focus particularly during the Nixon presidency and the infamous Watergate Scandal, but the theory and use of executive privilege existed long before Nixon. As in true American fashion, some argue in favor of executive privilege, while others view it in a more negative light. The intense controversy is what makes executive privilege so intriguing to review in a deeper and more in depth analysis. The theory of executive privilege has derived its power throughout evolution of time, a series of presidencies, and quite a few pinpointed circumstances resulting in some very notorious court cases.
As an illustration, tension in relationship can result from having money problems, seems to be the biggest problem for couples. As a result, there seems to be a lot of fighting going on in the relationship. Another, problem may be in the relationship, there is one or both partners re interested in someone else (coldness or openness) or one may be seeing someone, which cause confusion and arguing among themselves (DeVito 2016). Therefore, the theory posits that relationships can succumb to pressures that are often associated with maintaining connections and relationships, and the communication patterns can be affected by these forms of instability. (DeVito 2016) Equally important, patterns in communication that create a constant state of imbalance acts in such a way that it is adverse to cultivating and sustaining developed relationships. There are four principle concepts that are associated with this theory: opposing needs and desire, connection with others, autonomy and independence. (DeVito 2016 Pg. 236). One of the most prominent strengths of this theory is the practicality that is associated with rebalance of your life. It provides a sense of stability in relationships when someone utilizes the theory correctly. Communication strategies are taught in this theory which is great. For example, the principle issues is that it assumes that
Power is a difficult concept to identify; it has been defined in several ways by many scholars. Hinings et al. (1967) state that power is analogous to bureaucracy, while Bierstedt (1950) and Blau (1964) state that it is purely coercion (Stojkovic et al, 2008). Moreover, Hall and Tolbert (2005) identify that there are five types of power, reward, coercive, legitimate, referent, and expert (Stojkovic et al, 2008). According to studies these five types of power are important and needed in a criminal justice agency for greater effectiveness and efficiency.
In the story, the book states how they control power, but not why. What do you think is the central secret, the original motive as to why the government looked for total power? (
Some theorists believe that ‘power is everywhere: not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere… power is not an institution, nor a structure, nor possession. It is the name we give to a complex strategic situation in a particular society. (Foucault, 1990: 93) This is because power is present in each individual and in every relationship. It is defined as the ability of a group to get another group to take some form of desired action, usually by consensual power and sometimes by force. (Holmes, Hughes &Julian, 2007) There have been a number of differing views on ‘power over’ the many years in which it has been studied. Theorist such as Anthony Gidden in his works on structuration theory attempts to integrate basic structural analyses and agency-centred traditions. According to this, people are free to act, but they must also use and replicate fundamental structures of power by and through their own actions. Power is wielded and maintained by how one ‘makes a difference’ and based on their decisions and actions, if one fails to exercise power, that is to ‘make a difference’ then power is lost. (Giddens: 1984: 14) However, more recent theorists have revisited older conceptions including the power one has over another and within the decision-making processes, and power, as the ability to set specific, wanted agendas. To put it simply, power is the ability to get others to do something they wouldn’t otherwise do. In the political arena, therefore, power is the ability to make or influence decisions that other people are bound by.
All of us would love to have personal power, the power to manifest our dreams, the power to remain calm and loving in the face of fear, and the power to stay centered in ourselves in the face of attack.
Power is defined in the course study notes as the “ability of individuals or groups to get what they want despite the opposition”. Power is derived from a variety of sources including knowledge, experience and environmental uncertainties (Denhardt et al, 2001). It is also important to recognize that power is specific to each situation. Individuals or groups that may be entirely powerful in one situation may find themselves with little or no power in another. The county Registrar of Voters, who is my boss, is a perfect example. In running the local elections office, she can exercise the ultimate power. However, in a situation where she attempted to get the county selected for a desirable, statewide pilot project, she was powerless, completely at the mercy of the Secretary of State. Power is difficult to measure and even to recognize, yet it plays a major role in explaining authority. In organizations, power is most likely exercised in situations where “the stakes are high, resources are limited, and goals and processes are unclear” (Denhardt et al, 2001). The absence of power in organizations forces us to rely on soley hierarchical authority.
Several reasons why people make profound decisions include their past experiences, subjective bias, and individual differences, such as gender and socioeconomic status.
Marital stability is necessary to the beginning stage of overall family success. Within a family, the parents’ relationship controls the environment for the rest of the members’ ability to at...
Additionally, her parents have to make a lot of financial decisions because they are the primarily ones that help out the extended family that is still in Vietnam. Her dad always tries to send money back to Vietnam as he is the sole person in the United States on the paternal side. Many arguments happen as a result of this because her mom wants to focus on making sure that their family’s needs are met first. Her parents’ filial piety ideals are different whereas her dad is more focused on the extended family, and her mom on the immediate family. Despite the differences, care of family members is considered an important duty and role. Family plays a central role in family dynamics.
Though the origins of the phrase are unknown, women around the world have been saying, “the personal is the political and the political is personal” for the past few decades. It is still applicable today when analyzing social movements and the structure of power in society. This phrase does not mean that a woman’s every action is considered to be political and that every personal decision made is political. Instead, the theory could be explained, in terms of overall feminism, by saying personal problems are political problems that are the result of a long period of seemingly innate repression. We often consider the political and personal to be completely separate entities. However, the political’s inherent blend with the personal only makes the political stronger and more powerful. This phrase is useful for understanding the rationale behind those involved with French torture and cruelty in an Algiers prison in The Question, persecution and oppression in a West Bank village in Budrus, and the discrimination against Muslim women in France in Politics of the Veil.