Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Victim precipitation
Strengths and weaknesses of criminological theories
Strengths and weaknesses of criminological theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Victim precipitation
Historically the field of Criminology and Criminal Justice primary focus was on the offender, which meant that the victim did not receive proper attention. In criminal law victims appeared as witnesses, complainants or alleged victims until the trial ended. With an adversarial court system like that of America and the UK, the conflict is between the prosecution and the defendant. The victim who is at hand simply provides evidence for an offence that in reality was not necessarily committed against them but against the Crown, the state or the community. Garland remarked that light was rarely shed on victims other than as members of the public whose trouble bring about state action. Even then, their interest was considered as part of the general …show more content…
Positivist victimology was established in the-mid twentieth century of the discipline of victimology itself and specifically to the work of Hans von Hentig, Benjamin Mendelsohn and Hinderlang, Gottfredson and Garafalo. The positivist victimology is about "recognising the factors that cause the non-random victimization pattern, concerning the interpersonal violent crimes, and endeavouring to identify the victims who are prone to contribute to their own victimization". In this essay I will be critically discuss the key contributions positivist victimologists have made to the issue of victimisation. In doing so, this essay will focus on victim precipitation, by looking at work of Hentig, Mendelsohn and Wolfgangm. Following from this it will look at lifestyle theory by Hinderlang, Gottfredson and Garafalo and then the routine activity theory finally it will look at victim crime …show more content…
The “greedy” types were easily mislead because of their greediness. The “wonton” type was vulnerable because of their neediness. The “tormentor” type ends up being attacked by the victim he or she abused. Hence, the tormentor gets attack and becomes the victim because of the retaliation by the person they were abusing. This is equivalent to the wife who was being abused by her husband subsequently kills her husband. Hentig typologies of likely victim pave the way for notion of victim precipitation. This is because his typologies highlight the fact that some victims may play a part in crime against themselves.
Hentig theory also led to change in societal attitude towards crime. His theory also brought influential change. For example, his theory was regarded as a wonderful approach to the investigation of homicide. In that, the victim is dead and the offender is unknown and therefore by examining the victim’s lifestyle by interviewing friends and family, this aid law-enforcement agent to turn their attention and resources to the victim as a way of finding the unknown perpetrator. However, a criticism against his work was that it was was speculative rather than empirically
Schafer’s concept of functional responsibility involves victims being victimized due to their acts of negligence, provocations, and precipitative actions. (2016, p.5.) In this instance, King would be considered a precipitative victim due to his actions of dressing up and flirting with McInerney as described previously. The type of precipitation would be active because of King's provocative female like clothing and make up as well as his sexual advances towards McInerney. (Herrera, 2017.) In addition, the dynamic cause perspective can be used to see how victimization and the offending are directly influenced by one another. To be specific, the strain theory by Robert Agnew can be applicable here because McInerney experienced many negative emotions from King. (2016, p.43.) Von Hetig also had a similar theory where the primary emphasis was on the dynamics and typology, with King being young and mentally defective in this instance. In addition, as mentioned above, King and McInerney both had a troubled upbringing, and did not develop a solid bond with their parents and they both witnessed a form of abuse. They had to grow up without parental guidance, love, and much
Generally, the study of crime mainly focused on the offender until quite recently. In fact, Shapland et al (1985) described the victim as ‘the forgotten man’ of the criminal justice system and ‘the non-person in the eyes of the professional participants’. A new perspective was brought with victimology, an expanding sub-discipline of crimin...
…many people now acquire "victimhood" through counseling. Being a "victim" draws sympathy. It explains the tragedies, the failures, the hardships, the health problems and the disappointments of life. It relieves people of some of life's natural burdens: dealing with complexity, facing things beyond their control, and accepting responsibility for decisions and actions.
Christie, N. (1986) ‘The ideal victim’, in E. Fattah, (Ed.), From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System New York: St Matins Press
Victimology is the scientific study of the physical, emotional, and financial harm people suffer from illegal activities. A common struggle Victimologists face is determining who the victim is. In general, crimes don 't have an “ideal victim”. The term ideal victims refer to someone who receives the most sympathy from society (Christie, 2016). An example of this would be a hardworking, honest man who on his way to work, had his wallet taken by force. Most people in society would have sympathy for him. He spent his life making an honest living to earn what he has and was a victim of a robbery. Victimologists study the interactions victims have with criminals, society, and the criminal justice system (Karmen, 2015). According to (Karmen, 2015)
When the victim does not fit the ideal victim attributes which society has familiarised themselves with, it can cause complications and confusion. Experts have noticed there is already a significant presence of victim blaming, especially for cases involving both genders. The fear of being blamed and rejected by the public is prominent in all victims. Victim blaming proclaims the victim also played a role in the crime by allowing the crime to occur through their actions (Kilmartin and Allison, 2017, p.21). Agarin (2014, p.173) underlines the problem of victim blaming is due to the mass of social problems and misconceptions within society. The offender can have “an edge in court of public opinion” if victim blaming exists, resulting in the prevention of the case accomplishing an effective deduction in court (Humphries, 2009, p.27). Thus, victims will become more reluctant to report offences because of their decrease in trust in the police and criminal justice system, leading to the dark figure of
...ifferent crime patterns and thought processes of criminals. The reasons can only come from these theories and will help the justice systems become more prepared to react towards different crimes. However, with adding some enhancements, projects and experiments these two theories have the potential to change the criminology realm forever.
`Evaluation of Classicism and Positivism are two theories that will be clarified in this essay; classicist is a rational act and liberty. This method was industrialized between the 18th and 19th Century, it was created in order to process the criminal justice system and make sure everyone was treated equally (Classical Criminology is connected with Cesare Bonesana , Marchese de Beccaria). Positivism Criminology Is a an theory that is established by the concept of scientific understanding of law-breaking and criminality of people ,the key perception is to assess how behaviour is stubborn. There are also two types of positivism that illuminate the clarification of crime and deviancy, these are known as Psychological Positivism and Biological
Wolhuter, Lorraine, Neil Olley, and David Denham. Victimology: victimisation and victims’ rights. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009.
The world was starting to be viewed in a more scientific term and realized the world is a complicated place. People started to see factors beyond the individual’s control that may cause their behavior. Also began to view criminal behavior as a defeat that is beyond the individual’s control. Now that the world was starting to be viewed in a different manner, crime started to take place badly. Between the 1960’s and 70’s the crime in the United State was at an all-time high rate. During that time the Classical Criminology had renewed their interest. People also were tired of criminals trying to blame the society and not taking their punishments for committing the crimes. The Social process theory also explains how a person can get involved in crimes from their surroundings. Being social is great but sometimes the wrong company can cause a lot of problems. Not all the time a person is involved in a crime cause of their social life. Committing a crime is by choice no one can make a person do anything he or she does not want to
The idea of victim-oriented crime prevention holds that the majority of victimisation that occurs centres around a relatively small percentage of the population and that targeting crime prevention efforts and policy at potential or prior victims can prevent a large quantity of crime (Riley and Mayher 1980). In Garland’s (2001) investigation he observed that a reduced public confidence in the criminal justice system and its capability to reduce crime has led to victim treatment as playing a more important role in creating reform. In considering victims during criminal processes and law-making, the standard of efficiency in our system has been critically analysed and led to changes in a variety of areas. The development of official definitions of what constitutes victimhood and increased recognition of victims has helped legitimise and validate the criminal justice system.
The first theory that has advanced drastically is the biological theory. This theory is based on the belief that criminals are physiologically different from noncriminal. When this theory emerged it
Understanding the theories of victimology is important to understand the victims, we need to understand the four main theories of victimization. These theories are the principals of victim assessment. It will give the officer the tools to understand the motive behind the victimization giving him different types of views to analyze the victim. The four main theories of victimization are: Victim Precipitation, Lifestyle, Deviant Place, and Routine Activity. These four theories according to victimology give us the idea of how the victim become to be a victim. The word Victimization meanings “an act that exploits or victimizes someone” and “adversity resulting from being made a victim” (Vocabulary.com. Dictionary Victimization (2017)). By understanding the victim and the influences of their social life is important so we can give the victim the treatment and
Classical theory explores the idea that crime is the intent to commit, rather than a reaction to an unfavorable situation. This theory believes that a committed crime was intended to gain ‘self-seeking and self interest’ and because of this belief this theory believe that the criminals have to take full responsibility of there actions. Two known advocates of Classical theories are Cesane Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham. Their ideologies revolve around classical theory and have greatly influenced, through the creation of laws, rules and regulations, which have impacted society today.
Victim precipitation refers to the role or responsibility that a victim has in their own victimization. In the first generation of victimization theories and victimologist the idea of victim precipitation was studied and thought to be a piece of the whole picture of a crime committed. As time progressed it was not thought to be as much as a factor.