POSITIVE IMPACTS OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP & REPRESENTATIVE PARTICIPATION
In response to intensified global and domestic competition, many worldwide companies have sought to improve company performance through more efficient use of their work forces. One of the prime ways of utilizing workforces efficiently is by involving employees in various business propositions and activities (Cooke, 1994). Employee involvement is defined as “a participative process to use the entire capacity of workers, designed to encourage employee commitment to organisational success” (Cotton, 1993). A major topic of debate in recent times is to what extend an efficient employee involvement programme helps an organisation to prosper and grow, rather than having an adverse effect on its performance. This essay focuses on the impact of two specific employee involvement programmes i.e. employee ownership and representative participation on an organisations performance by drawing data from several empirical studies.
Employee Ownership refers to workers becoming part owners of a company by being allocated shares in their respective firms in addition to their wages. Having a direct link between their effort and reward, employees are motivated into putting in greater effort as they have a larger interest in their employee’s profitability ( Bennett, 1997). A study of Polish Cooperatives was conducted in 1993 to derive the effect of employee ownership on a firm’s productivity. Information was gathered in a survey on three industries, clothing, printing and construction. The survey revealed that these industries were characterised by a fixed percentage of shares owned by employees. The productivity wa...
... middle of paper ...
...Empowerment for Business Results: A Study of Powergrid. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. 39 (4), p517-532
Leana, C Ahlbrandt, R & Murrell, A. (1992). The Effects of Employee Involvement Programs on Unionized Workers' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Preferences in Decision Making. The Academy of Management Journal. 35 (4), p861-873.
Markey, R Harris, C Lind, J Busck, O & Knudsen, H. (2010). Employee Participation on Work Environment in Food Processing Industry in Denmark & New Zealand. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. 45 (4), p622-634.
Marsh, T & McAllister, D (1981). ESOPs Tables: A survey of companies with employee stock ownership plans. Journal of Corporation Law (6), p551-623
Wilson, N & Peel, M (1991). The impact of absenteeism and quits of profit sharing and other forms of employee participation. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 44(3) p454-468
As companies look to expand operations and hire new employees, many economic and environmental factors are taken into consideration. The cost of labor is one of the primary concerns as labor generally constitutes a large part of company budgets. The organization of labor by unions further increases this concern. The wages of unionized workers are significantly higher than the wages of nonunion workers in almost every industry (Fossum, 2012). Higher wages generally result in reduced company profits, lower share prices, and reduced shareholder returns (Fossum, 2012). Unionization also reduces the employer’s flexibility with regards to hiring, transferring, or promoting employees (Fossum, 2012). Productivity may be negatively impacted by unionization because merit is often eliminated as a criterion for wage increases or promotions (Fossum, 2012). As a result of these negative impacts, employers are motivated to oppose unionization.
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
employee stock ownership can create a burden of long-term planning for the sustainability and repurchase program; not all employees can be able to purchase stock. According to the case, Atul believes in a total compensation between 0-10 percent based on employee’s salaries could play as a “trade-off” for a “supportive and respective work environment” (Calo et al., n.d.).
The workers are stakeholders for Cadburys because they have a big interest in the business, the reason for this is that they are the ones that produce the product they are making and without them there wouldn’t be a business. The workers want to earn high wages and keep their jobs in the business. The work environment has to be a good standard because if the work environment was poor then the staff wouldn’t be able to work at the best of the
Lariberte, P. (2013). Trade unions and worker cooperatives: Where Are We At. International Journal of Labor Research, 273-274. Retrieved 06 17, 2014 from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---actrav/documents/publication/wcms_240534.pdf
In contrast , the shareholder theory organisations or organisation's decision-makers only have the responsibility to their shareholders by increasing the organisation profits and should only make the decisions to increase as much as possib...
Unions traditionally were “a continuous association of wage earners for the purpose of maintaining or improving the condition of their employment” (Webb & Webb, 1894, as cited in Bryson, 2011b, slide 7). Their function was to campaign for compassionate management procedures, equivalent bargaining power between employers and employees, and for fairness and democracy to be initiated into the workplace (Bryson, 2011a). Union activity at this time tended to focus on nationwide bargaining for industrial groups (Geare, 1983, as cited in Haynes, 2005), with their role seen as wage bargainers and in...
Flanagan, R. J. (2005). Has Management Strangled U.S. Unions? Journal of Labor Research, 26(1), 33-63.
Jensen, M.C and Meckling, W.H (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, October, 1976, V. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360. Available on: http://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/jensen-meckling.pdf. [Accessed on 20th April 2014].
...selid, M.A. 1995. ‘The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 38, pp635-670.
John W. Budd & Devasheesh Bhave (2006). Sage Handbook of Industrial and Employment Relations. Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota. Chapter 5.
Employee trust has a direct effect on the performance of a particular workplace. Depending on the attitudes of employee to the management, this effect can either be good, bad, or a mix of both. Management and employees tends to have conflict within organizations due to various issues, but mainly because of the questionable reliability of employees towards their manager. The success of a workforce is dependent on the financial performance, labor productivity, and product or service quality which is controlled by the employee, but when employees start slowing down their performance to protest with the management, then something is wrong on how things are handled by the owners. According to Brown, McHardy, and Taylor, co-authors of an economic article that pertains to UK workers, employees’ trust are subjective on the four qualities, often called as trust measures, that an effective manager must possess: (1) managers are relied to keep their promises; (2) managers treat employees fairly; (3) managers deal with employees honestly, and; (4) managers are sincere in attempting to understand employees’ views. Their research shows that when employees are assured that the managers meet the four conditions above, the financial performance, labor productivity, and product or service quality are “a lot better than average”. Employees work performance are increased and trust is also strengthen between employees and employer.
Employee empowerment can be described as giving employees' accountability and ability to make choices about their work without managerial authorization. Good managers are expected to assist employees to improve job success by supporting, training, leading and giving advice. Employee empowerment can increase employees' motivation, job satisfaction, and loyalty to their companies. The power that managers comprise should now be shared with employees with confidence, assertion, inspiration, and support. Work decisions and the ability to control an individual’s amount of work are now being relied upon at lower-level management positions (Fragoso, 1999). Groups of empowered employees with little or no supervision are now being formed and these groups are being called self-managed teams. These groups can now solve work problems, make choices on schedules and operations, learn to do other employees’ jobs, and are held accountable for the quality of their finished products.
If staff are absent from work they are not able to carry out the functions for which they have been employed. In many businesses, these functions have to be taken on by someone else - if not, the customer could suffer. Reducing absenteeism is an important feature of human resource management. The extent to which absenteeism affects businesses has been a topical feature. Not only does absenteeism cause problems, but employers are beginning to recognise the effects of 'presenteeism' - staying at work when you are ill or because you believe that in some way your 'presence' will help boost your promotion prospects.
Diversity makes a great performance in the organizations through valuing and using all talents of the employees of various groups. Nadeem Iqbal et al, (2013). Organizational performance and employee’s involvement have relationship with each other. There are three components to measured employees involvement and organizational performance like job empowerment, team orientation and capacity development. Its effect positively on organizational performance trough measured delegation of authority, team performance, employee’s skills and knowledge. All aspect compare with those organizations which never focus on these components.