Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative impact of divorce on children
Effect divorce has on children
Importance of family
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The negative impact of divorce on children
The most important people in a child’s life are his or her parents. A person’s first bond is with the people who are raising them. Parents get to decide what their child will be doing with his or her free time, play dates, sports, pre-school and other activities. Building strong healthy bonds with children is crucial for their outcome. It is has shown that, “Families characterized by warm interpersonal relationships and effective parenting are associated with a lower likelihood of affiliation with juvenile offenders and of juvenile crime (Henry, Tolan & Gorman-Smith).” Positive family vibes are as important as the relationship between everyone in the family, including the parents because, “…children raised by married parents with low-conflict …show more content…
Mom allows Susie to go sleepover Gabby’s house but Dad disapproves and wants Susie to stay home because she has church in the morning and Dad does not like the way Gabby’s parents are raising her. This creates a dilemma amongst the parents but little Susie is a victim because she does not know what to do. Sometimes parents who can not get along, get divorced but this does not help a child because studies have, “…found that children of divorced parents are up to six times more likely to be delinquent than children from intact families (Larson, Swyers & Larson). Children of divorced parents have two separate households, forcing the child to live two separate lives because Mom can follow a certain lifestyle that Dad does not believe in. So when Susie is at Dad’s she goes to church every Sunday but when Susie is at Mom’s she goes to temple. Susie is forced to live two conflicting lifestyles, which can lead to her “slipping away” by distancing from one or both …show more content…
This causes people from the same economic status live together and children of certain classes are exposed to certain environments. Social disorganization is a term that was created by Shaw and McKay that helps explain why neighborhoods of lower socio-economic status tend to be disorganized and why there is a higher risk of crime and gang activity. It is mentioned that these conditions, “…reduce the likelihood that residents will develop strong community ties or common norms. In turn, the lack of social ties renders the residents less invested in the well-being of the community, which may manifest itself in a lower likelihood of monitoring youth behavior (Shaw and McKay).” Families that live in the first ring of the Concentric Zone Model, which would be the Transitional Zone, are more prone to weak relationships and crime. The Concentric Zone Model was developed by Ernest Burgess to help explain why there is more crime in certain neighborhoods. Families living in the transitional zone are often of lower class where parents are working in order to make enough money and try to get their family out of that neighborhood. While Mom and Dad are at work, most children just wander around unsupervised. In these neighborhoods there is a high turnover rate which does not allow families of the neighborhood to form bonds and monitor
Children from a single-parent home that are relatively conflict-free are less likely to be a delinquent than children from conflict-ridden “intact” homes. A stable, secure, and mutually supportive family is exceedingly important
Hinton, W., Sheperis, C., & Sims, P. (2000). Family based approaches to juvenile delinquency. The Family Journal, 11(2), 167-173.
Easterling and Johnson. (2012). Understanding Unique Effects of Parental Incarceration on Children: Challenges, Progress, and Recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 342-356.
When a person becomes a parent, their role in life undoubtedly changes. The person must become a teacher, a guide, and a helping hand in the life of the child. Research has shown that there is a distinct connection between how a child is raised and their overall developmental outcome. John Bowlby’s attachment theory emphasizes the importance of the regular and sustained contact between the parent-infant or parent-child relationship (Travis & Waul 2003). Yet, what happens when the only physical contact a child can share with their parent is a hand pressed on the shield of glass that separates the two? What happens when the last memory of their mother or father was from the corner of their own living room as they watched their parent become handcuffed? In 2007, there was an estimate of approximately 1.7 million children of incarcerated parents in the United States (Poehlmann, Dallaire, Loper & Shear 2010). Of those 1.7 million children, 58% of those children are under the age of 10, with the mean age being 8 (Travis & Waul 2003). The children of incarcerated parents are often moved from one family and one school to the next. The child must cope with this issue in home and in school, and may find it especially hard to cope with during school. Schools, however, can be a safe place for these children. This research explored the psychological effects of parent incarceration on the child, the school-based problems that occur as a result, and what educators can do to support children of incarcerated parents.
According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) the Social Disorganization theory was developed in the mid 1940’s by Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay while they were researchers studying at the Institute for Social Research in Chicago. Shaw and McKay (1942) based their research of the study of crime in Chicago off of the work that Ernest Burgess theorized in how urban areas grow through a process of continual expansion from their inner core toward outlying areas. According to Cullen and Agnew (20011) one of the primary arguments in the social disorganization theory is the idea that there are settlement patterns in the development of cities, and how these patterns impact neighborhood characteristics and corresponding crime levels. Shaw and McKay developed a theory based off the settlement pattern research that Ernest Burgess conducted. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) Ernest Burgess stated ...
According to Price & Kunz, (2003) family structure is a major factor in explaining delinquency. The research aimed at finding a link between cohabiting and other family types with delinquency (Price & Kunz, 2003). They made an important finding that adolescents from cohabiting families are at greater odds of engaging in non-violent delinquency compared to those from biological-parent families. The findings contradict the findings of other studies that show that that youth from broken families are likely to engage themselves in delinquent activities. For example, in one longitudinal study by Juby and Farrington, (2003) they found out that children especially boys who were from non-intact families portrayed negative behaviors compared to those that were from intact families (Juby & Farrington, 2001). Moreover, Prince & Kunz, (2003) performed a meta-analysis involving divorce and juvenile delinquency. They also made a finding that children from divorced homes have a high rate of delinquency compared to those from intact homes.
2006. “Disentangling the Risks: Parent Criminal Justice Involvement and Children’s Exposure to Family Risks.” Criminology and Public Policy 5(4).
Hinton, W., Sheperis, C., & Sims, P. (2000). Family based approaches to juvenile delinquency. The Family Journal, 11(2), 167-173.
Therefore, the community has informal social control, or the connection between social organization and crime. Some of the helpful factors to a community can be informal surveillance, movement-governing rules, and direct intervention. They also contain unity, structure, and integration. All of these qualities are proven to improve crime rate. Socially disorganized communities lack those qualities. According to our lecture, “characteristics such as poverty, residential mobility, and racial/ethnic heterogeneity contribute to social disorganization.” A major example would be when a community has weak social ties. This can be caused from a lack of resources needed to help others, such as single-parent families or poor families. These weak social ties cause social disorganization, which then leads higher levels of crime. According to Seigel, Social disorganization theory concentrates on the circumstances in the inner city that affect crimes. These circumstances include the deterioration of the neighborhoods, the lack of social control, gangs and other groups who violate the law, and the opposing social values within these neighborhoods (Siegel,
In their Social Disorganization Theory, Shaw and McKay concluded that “bad parts of town” could be found in almost every large city. This is because as observed within the ecological model of expansion in the growth of large cities, there was a distinct interplay of factors influencing Social Disorganization in their zones of transition. Shaw can McKay concluded that it was a place that bred crime (the zone of transition) and that crime is much higher in the zone of transition because of the presence of poverty, residential mobility, and ethnic heterogeneity (Course Textbook, CH.7). These zones of transition were generally speaking seen as “ lower class
Studies indicate that positive parenting, including normative development, monitoring, and discipline, clearly affects whether children will become delinquent. Adequate supervision of free-time activities, whereabouts, and peers are critical to assure that children do not drift into antisocial and delinquent patterns of behavior. Surprisingly, little is known about normative and moral development with the family as they relate to delinquency. Single-parent families, and in particular mother-only families, produce more delinquent children than two-parent families. Research indicates that parenting practices account for most, but not all, of the ...
-Shaw and McKay’s social disorganization: a neighborhood surrounded
Social Disorganization theory talks about how one’s surroundings impacts the risk of crime around them. The Social Disorganization Theory was developed to show how much a neighbors and its surroundings affect people and crime. There are many factors that go with crime according to the Social Disorganization Theory. One major factor is Ethnic Diversity. According to the Social Disorganization Theory, the more diverse urban areas are, the more likely their is to be crime committed. (Social Disorganization, 2003). The ethnicity of the community affects crime because of the lack of communication. If you have language barriers, and people who do not understand each other, they may be some tension resulting in more crime. Social Disorganization
A finding that emerges very strongly and consistently is that delinquents have very poor relationships with their parents” (Gove 303-304). The teens who commit crimes often lack a parental figure in their lives. These teens are not strictly overseen by their parents, and their parents rarely know what they are up to or what they are doing (Gove 303). “Poor parent-child relationships, lack of parental control, and erratic behavior of parents could be a product of juvenile misbehavior and the juvenile’s hostility towards his or her parents” (Gove 304). Teens that do not have a close relationship with their parents often resort to delinquency as a form of resentment. “The family as an institution plays a critical role in the socialization of children; as a consequence, parents presumably play a critical role in whether their children misbehave” (Gove 315). Parents play the biggest role in a child’s life because the parents have been with the child since birth. Parents shape, mold, and provide the foundation that a teen needs to make hard decisions and to live by a good m...
In a study conducted by Stacey M. Nelson and Stephen Rubin, the relationship between the level of attachment to parents and juvenile delinquency is explored. It is inferred that if a child lacks a healthy attachment to their parents, they will be involved in adolescent delinquency. The study looked at both male and females, from ages 13 to 18. Participants completed various surveys in relation to attachment. The results were inconclusive; it was not clear if attachment had anything to do with juvenile delinquency.