Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic considerations in the middle ages
Economic considerations in the middle ages
Impacts of feudalism in the medieval church
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economic considerations in the middle ages
Beginning in the very end of the Early Middle Ages and after Charlemagne, Western Europe’s economic and social systems were based around feudalism. Feudalism lasted until the 12th century, but during the High Middle Ages the relationship between feudalism and Catholicism changed. Beginning in the 10th century and continuing into the High Middle Ages, the Church was much more resistant to secular control. At the end of the 11th century, Pope Gregory VII wrote the “Dictatus Papae,” a document that expressed these views. Beginning in the 9th century, Western Europe operated by the feudal system, which above all emphasized the power of land. In this system, powerful warriors known as overlords gave land to less powerful warriors known as vassals, …show more content…
Both of these events were related to Pope Gregory VII, who believed the church should have more power than the state and be independent. The “Dictatus Papae” by Pope Gregory VII expressed these beliefs, as well as the powers of the Pope. One power he included was: “That he alone can depose or reinstate bishops” (“Dictatus Pope,” line 3). This line reflected the Investiture Controversy between the Pope and Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV. Before this controversy, the Emperor had the power to invest power in bishops; however, by including this dictate, the Pope made it clear he believed the Pope “alone”—meaning no one else, especially the Emperor—should have this power. In the end, the Pope and Emperor reached a compromise in the early 12th century, but the Pope came out ahead because he was given the power to invest bishops with their power. This reduced the amount of secular control on Catholics, since it meant bishops no longer owed the Emperor fealty as …show more content…
In the feudal system, “fealty” was the loyalty vassals owed to their overlord for giving them land. This system forced people to give up their loyalty in exchange for power, which gave power to the state. In this dictate, Pope Gregory VII attempted to take away that power by asserting he could take that fealty away from the overlords, or as he calls them, “wicked men.” Clearly, there the Pope had great distaste for this “wicked” feudal system, so he tried to take away their power over the
The beginning of individualism’s gradual evolution was first manifested in the Renaissance Era. The Renaissance was a ripe time ready for change. The weakening role of the Catholic Church led to an increase in power for the masses. Corruption plagued Church officials and many sought theological respite elsewhere. The reemphasis of ancient Greek and Roman texts proffered alternatives for many to satisfy their religious needs. This helped contribute to the abolishment of the Church’s imposition of its absolute truth and its claim to ultimate authority. As the church lost power, so did the political units. The bonds between church and state began to erode. Feudalism declined, hence giving rise to new political opportunity. The noble class no longer held a monopoly on the valued positions in society. Rather, one was able to pursue wealth and fame through various endeavors ranging from artist to soldier.
Lay investiture was a major problem during the reign of King Henry IV and the papacy of Pope Gregory VII. Up to this point, secular leaders had the power to appoint bishops and abbots in their land, causing a blend between the lines of Church and state. Gregory or “Hildebrand” recognized this dilemma and restricted investiture to the duty of the pope in 1075. Henry IV responded very cruelly and Hildebrand promptly excommunicated him. The Concordat of Worms eventually solved this controversy in 1122, in which lay investiture by secular leaders was eliminated. This was one of the first examples of the struggle between Church and state and it certainly was not the last.
Roles of the Catholic Church in Western civilization has been scrambled with the times past and development of Western society. Regardless of the fact that the West is no longer entirely Catholic, the Catholic tradition is still strong in Western countries. The church has been a very important foundation of public facilities like schooling, Western art, culture and philosophy; and influential player in religion. In many ways it has wanted to have an impact on Western approaches to pros and cons in numerous areas. It has over many periods of time, spread the teachings of Jesus within the Western World and remains a foundation of continuousness connecting recent Western culture to old Western culture.-
The prestige of papacy has faltered many times during the History of the Roman Catholic Church. One of the largest issues with papacy prior to the time of reformation was the influence of France on the church. Throughout history countries or monarchies have often fought for power and influence over the church and state. For a period of time, the papacy left residency in Rome and moved to Avignon, France due to France’s strength influence of the popes of the time. The results of this residency would affect both the church and all people in the surrounding areas. Not only that, but the effects lasted well on past the residency eventually leading to the Great Schism. In order to understand the effect of Avignon papacy it is important to
A king of England could not remove a pope from his position but popes claimed that they could remove a king by excommunicating him - this meant that the king’s soul was condemned to Hell and people then had the right to disobey the king.
In the latter half of the 11th century, the two great powers in Europe, the Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor, became embroiled in a dispute. Both believed that they, and they alone, had the power to appoint bishops and abbots. Each had a fair argument for their point of view, based on, among other things, precedence, decrees, and divine right.
The controversy between papal and imperial authority reaches new heights near the end of the eleventh century as Emperor and Pope argue the right to rule supreme over the other. Pope Gregory VII (d.1085) asserts in the Dictatus Papae, that papal authority is supreme in comparison to the imperial powers of King Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor (d.1106). The Dictatus Papae decrees that only the papacy can rule and grant investitures to a new abbot or bishop. King Henry opposes the decree and engages Pope Gregory in a series of letters, where each writer claims divine-legitimacy and the right of investiture. Each contender believes in their own authority as supreme and therefore refuse to back down from one another. The difference in papal and
Only a few months after “Clericis laicos” was issued, King Philip forbade exportation of money from France to Rome, depriving the Church of the revenue it needed for operation which left Boniface “no choice but to come to terms quickly with Philip.” (Kagan 48) Already, the Church was in the same state of desperation for funds as before and was forced to rely further on the populace once again. The Church was crippled politically again to the joy of Philip. Philip would later proceed to arrest and convict Boniface’s Parisian legate, Bernard Saisset, demanding Boniface recognize the royal process which would “surrender his jurisdiction over the French episcopate.” (Kagan 48) Unable to ignore this challenge, Boniface would proceed to champion Saisset as a defender of clerical independence, demand his release, revoke all former taxation agreements and issued a bull titled “Ausculta fili” which declared Church superiority. In turn, after being put on the defensive, Boniface would later issue Unam Sanctum which put temporal authority under spiritual power which allowed France to deem him a heretic and use their military force against him which would eventually lead to his death. Challenging France would be Boniface’s downfall
Before the 16th century Protestant Reformation, Christianity it Europe was in a questionable and somewhat corrupt state. During the mid 15th century central and western Europe was set up in the form of a hierarchy, which was headed by the pope. At this period in time the pope claimed all spiritual authority over Christians, as well as political authority over all inhabitants of the Papal States. In addition to the claims the pope made, the church also owned close to one-fourth of the land in Europe that lead to a strong centralization of papal authority. Close to all of the Europeans at this time were Christian and would pay taxes directly to the church as a result of this ownership. European Christians were taught in their upbringing that without the guidance and rituals of the priests and the church, there would be no path for them to salvation. Despite the church attempting to teach morality among members, the clergy started to become greedy and full of corruption that fueled their desire for ...
During the Middle Ages, feudalism served as the “governing political, social, and economic system of late medieval Europe.” Feudalism consisted of feudal liege lords giving land and protection to vassals, common men, in exchange for their allegiance and military service. Although this principle may at first sound like a fair trade, it in actuality restricted the entire society and took away every bit of their independence. In essence, this system could even be compared to a “mini-dictatorship” because the common people relied on ...
She examines 6 popes between 1470-1530 who she claims lead in a way similar to politicians. They lost touch with the common people both emotionally and intellectually. A little known cleric led the revolution challenging papacy that culminated in the reformation of the church. In that context, Barbara outlines that the popes were venal, immoral, and their power politics was calamitous. The faithful were distressed by their leadership, which ignored all the protests and the signs that a revolt was coming. In the end, the papal constituency lost almost half of its followers to Protestants. Barbara says that these people were driven by the greed and the urge to create a family empire that would outlive them. This chapter sums up the essence of folly in these major failures, lack of a fixed policy, over extravagance, and the illusion that their rule was
The Pope is the high order of the Catholic Church and his wishes or demands are usually fulfilled the way he sees fit. In the story, he calls for the people of the faith to take back the holy land where Jesus Christ was born because of the oppression of the Christian people in the area. The Pope was wanting nothing more than to get a sense of pride back into the faith of the Christian people and hold their
of the Cardinals were uneasy with the decision of his papacy so while talking to them all Kiril, to
The Church was organised into a hierarchical system that sustained the Church’s stability and control over the people and lower clergy, by organising them into different groups. First there were the ordinary believers, the citizens of the kingdom who followed the Christian faith. Then there was the clergy, the members who devoted their lives to the church. Each group of the clergy was assigned specific functions by the clergy nobles to help run the Church competently. Amongst all the clergy associates, the Pope was at the top, he had the equivalent if not more power than the ruling monarch and was in charge of all political affairs and administered the clergy. He was able to dictate political laws and even comment on the Monarch’s decisions. Under the Pope, there were the bishops. The bishops directed church courts and managed cases correlated to the public such as marriage, wills and other public predicaments. Priests held religious services that consisted of sacraments, baptisms and the usual Sabbath services. The monks and nuns received manual labour that required helping clean the monasteries and assist the needy. Educated monks copied manuscripts of medieval and ancient knowledge in the Scriptorium. Finally...
These objections include People claiming that even through the Church’s Popes can be traced back to Christ, these men are human and therefore are weak and sinful especially the Popes during the tenth century. One ought to try and refute such a manner as this, while it is true that some popes have acted in a way that they shouldn’t, the Catholic Church has never taught that Popes would not error in their ways. Another objection that has been raised is that even though the Catholic Church claims that they teach Christ’s doctrine, the Catholic Church teaches things not in the Bible, and in the 16th Century the Bible was restored to what Christ really taught by the Protestants. The answer to this is that first, things that Christ clearly taught, for example the Eucharist being Christ’s body is clearly stated in the Bible; second, while Catholics do have some doctrines that cannot be found in the Bible in the book of John we see that it is written that not all the things Christ did can be found within the Bible, and finally Christ gave his apostles power as well as well as the power to hand down that power. And a third objection is that “the hierarchy and the office of the papacy came into existence only many years after the time of the time of Christ. Some say it was not until the time of Constantine, although most historians now have to admit that the hierarchy and the papacy existed earlier” (Carroll 18). The historical evidence shows that in the days of the Apostles, there was a structure to