Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media influences on public opinion
Media influence on public opinion
Media influence on public perception
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media influences on public opinion
Social Media has arguably become one of the fastest and effective ways of spreading news information. This has become a vital part of the identity of social media because news information is how citizens find out and create opinions about politics. The changing role of media has allowed for an unprecedented amount of user interactions between sources and other users as well. As a result, social media has played a role in the political polarization that is becoming further divided. The Pew Research Center surveyed 10,000 adults on their political views and the center discovered that Political Polarization is the most prominent that it has been in over twenty years. Political Polarization in this sense is the degree to which liberals and conservatives …show more content…
Consequently, when there is such high political polarization it is almost impossible to find a middle ground that satisfies both parties. (Suh 6) it is important that we look at how social media plays a role in creating Partisanship due to its growing importance in terms of providing political information to people. Furthermore, social media assists in creating polarization by creating a space in which users can view information that agrees with their political identities. However, in order to do so we must discuss the how social media has fundamentally changed the consumption of news and how this has created a significant importance of social media in terms of the news. Social media creates a space in which one can become completely isolated from opposing views causing an increase their own political identification through a sense of …show more content…
This is crucial to understanding the importance of social media because traditional news sources originally decided how a news story would be portrayed to the public which could be a part of a specific agenda. This traditional media did not allow for consumers to communicate openly with those who were in charge of producing the information as communication was limited to a specific location such as a letter to the editor. Hanifi Kurt wrote a journal article in which he discussed the how social media has changed journalism. For example, social media has created a completely new platform that does not place any limits on how users can communicate with publishers. For example, social media enables readers to be active participants and even creates a space for citizens to publish content themselves which helps social media to have an abundance of information and content. Not only is social media creating a new unlimited connection with the consumers and publishers, but it is also creating a new source of news now known as citizen news that allows for citizens to get the viewpoint of someone who is of a similar political status to them (Kurt 824). The connection that social media is allowing to be established between creators and consumers of news is related to partisanship because much of the interactions that users are having with news sources are related to their own ideological views.
In Nicholas Carr’s article “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics”, Carr writes about the effects that social media has on politics. In his article, Carr focuses more on the negative effect that social media has when it comes to politics. Some points that he makes about social media include specific examples like the recent presidential campaigns, how other technological advances over the years have effected politics, and the effectiveness that social media has on politics
Although, in recent years it is seen that consumers are less likely to subscribe to newspapers and/or watch the daily news. This is due to the fact that they are typically bias in their opinions, and are seen to lack the whole story when presented. Rise in polarization in the media is due to a new found competition between news networks, which was not present sixty years ago. Wilson says, “the news we get is not only more omnipresent, it is also more competitive and hence often more adversarial”. The media outlets are fighting for views, and are willing to do whatever it takes to get them. Which leads to them configuring the stories to what people want to here. Thus making their viewer ratings higher. It is known that certain news stations get more views depending on the political party. “Those who watch CNN are more likely to be Democrats than Republicans; the reverse is emphatically true of Fox”. The media has more outlets to reach their viewers to maximize the effectiveness of their biased
Whether political polarization is good or bad for the nation is still up for debate, but the general consensus is it exists due to a variety of reasons. From the construction of our Constitution, it is clear that the intent of our founding fathers was to create opposition in order to prevent tyranny from prevailing. Polarization is a result of the dividing of a nation into political parties. Though polarization has fluctuated throughout the years, it has caused a great deal of trouble in regards to passing legislation and has resulted in a gridlocked Congress. Even though some fear congressional polarization is destined to get worse, “it is mathematically impossible for congress to get much more polarized” than it is now.
Social media has changed the game of politics. In today’s world, with the public looking to smartphones and tablets as their primary source of news, politicians have been forced to adapt the tone and content of their message to fit this new, more connected audience. Perhaps no politician understands this more than notorious billionaire, real estate tycoon, and now presidential candidate, Donald Trump. Through utilization of social media, more specifically Twitter, combined with his disregard for sounding too extreme or politically incorrect, Trump has gained a massive web audience - over four million followers and
In the current time, it seems like one cannot go a day without using at least one social media website. This might be especially true among groups of teenagers and young adults. Social media became a vital part of daily life that feeds people with several types of information constantly. Political news is a type of information that can reach the people through the means of social media. Since presidents are constantly seeking new strategies to increase their communication with the public in order to spread their political message, they utilize the different social media websites. Hence, social media became a platform to spread political message. It is not surprising that now the majority of political officials and candidates have social media accounts more than ever before, such as a Twitter account.
When one hears polarization what comes to mind? Division? Freezing? Polarization being discussed is the views of people and how they differ. So what is political polarization? Political polarization refers to cases in which an individual’s stance on a given issue, policy, or person is more likely to be strictly defined by their identification with a particular political party or ideology. Politics have caused many problems in our country and polarization is a very significant one. The articles “Divided We Now Stand”, “What’s Wrong with Washington? Tribalism”, and “How Politics Break Our Brains, and How We Can Put Them Back Together” all have two main subjects in common which are how polarization in our country has worsened over the years, and
Political Polarization is the conflict regarding Republican and Democratic political parties not agreeing to make decisions for the national issues like federal funding. (Lindqvist E. & Ostling R., 2010, p.543)
Naturally, journalism would spill over to the Internet and as social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook grew in popularity, so did regular citizens involvement with sharing news. The argument can be made that the explosion of social media journalism was due to frustration from the lack of coverage of news that mattered to society. For example, the lack of subjective coverage of Michael Brown 's death helped with the creation of #BlackLivesMatter and spread of news related to African-American’s and other minorities across the country. After all, journalism is supposed to be a public forum. Millions of people on Twitter share their thoughts and opinions on several topics, furthering the conversation and to some degree challenging society. Things such as “Moments” on Twitter provide us with direct links and summaries to the world’s most important stories and encourage a conversation. According to journalism.org, 63% of users on Twitter and Facebook get their news from these websites. Even more eye opening is that 59% of users on Twitter keep up to date with news stories via Twitter while they are in the process of happening.[3] The rise of social media related journalism has caused some issues however. “Inevitably, as citizen involvement grows, more of our media culture is concerned with talking about news, instead of focusing on original reporting and the vetting of it.”[4] Because the general public has the ability to post as they wish and pass it off as news, it has affected the accuracy of many reports. Many stories lack reputable sources but are shared between millions as an accurate and true story. There are several websites designed to spread inaccurate information. The website www.fakenewswatch.com exists to inform people of these sites in order to avoid mishaps. Recently a Connecticut mom went viral for being involved in an online hoax
However, other scholars have a narrower definition of polarization, partisan polarization. Partisan polarization is the ideological homogeneity of political parties (greater clustering around the party mean) and growing distinction between the ideological positions of the Democratic and Republican Party (McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal 2006; Theriault 2008). This definition is primarily the definition used in recent scholarly work (Levendusky and Malhortra 2016; Baker 2016). Lee (2015), evaluating polarization affect governance, demonstrates that political polarization does not have to include polarization of parties and that the spatial definition often used is simply a division of two groups.
Presidential debates and campaigns over time have developed widely because of social media. The majority of America can research, converse and ask questions through various types of social media that can lead to positive and negative outcomes. “Although the internet had been around for years prior to the 2008 Presidential Elections, it used to be more of a luxury and now it has become a way of life. It is common belief that social media and the Internet are now one of the most important features that a political candidate could have and it could make or break their race,” (Orozco, 2014). The goal of this paper is to bring awareness of the effects on social media and politics. In this paper, I will be discussing how social media can play a big role in helping and hurting a presidential candidate, the presidential debates in the past few decades, and lastly how social media can be used for good when campaigning
Mainstream media such as television, radio, newspapers were the primary source of reliable information before the epoch of the internet. However, the situation has changed. The evolution of modern technology in the world today has led to the continuous increase in the methods of practicing journalism. Social and technological advancements have not only improved the pace and content of this field’s practice, but has extended its genre to online or cybernetic journalism. (Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2007). News websites most of which are owned by major media companies and alternative websites with user generated content such as social networking sites and blogs are gaining grounds in the journalism field of practice. (Nel, n.d). One of the chief forces affecting the practice of journalism nowadays is online citizen journalists. Nel (n.d) defines citizen journalism as “individuals playing an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analysing and disseminating news and information”. He further adds that “citizen journalism is slowly being looked upon as a form of rightful democratic ways of giving hones news, articles, etc, directly by citizens of the world from anywhere.” One of the major researches conducted in the field of citizen journalism, describes the phenomenon as “individuals who intend to publish information online, meant to benefit a community”, and this information is expected to benefit the audience or the wider population in making decisions for the improvement of their community. (Carpenter, 2010.)
The purpose of this essay is to develop a further understanding of the impacts of social media in regards to the political debate. By looking at the topic of social media and the use rhetoric in response to politics in the 21st century, a deeper understanding of the issue can be established. Social media has become a primary source for the discussion of politics by the average citizen; whether through the sharing of articles, “memes”, advertisements or personal expository statements. As a result, large sums of information and ideas are spread rapidly to a wide variety of subjects. However, much of this information may not be accurate and could be misinterpreted. Consequently potentially misinformed citizens may not be able to make a properly
There has never been a time in the history of the United States where people were actively connected. Social media has shaped the social and political culture in a way that could not have been expected. The media of information is no longer narrowed down to the viewer and the reporter. Modern technology has taken this process a step further, encompassing the idea of participatory media. Participatory media essentially centers around “news reporting and the political power involved with destabilizing the one-directional broadcast from a reporter to an audience into a multi-voiced conversation among participants” (Mandiberg, 3).
In trying to attract new audiences, news media have begun to transition from reporting to becoming a form of entertainment. With the meteoric rise of social media’s role as a news source, the fight for an increase of diversity in the media, and the ever-growing desire of immediate content, the future of responsible journalism is more important than ever. Ask yourself, why do I think the way I do? Where do my political views originate? How do I prove them? Most likely, it is due to the biased portrayal of issues in the media and the politicization that accompanies what we consume. Now, compare your views to your preferred news reporting entity. More than likely, they are the same.
Mainstream news organisations have seen their revenues drop in print, television and radio across the board and have looked to fill the void with online news in the form of websites, blogs, online videos and social media pages. Citizen journalists have risen to take full advantage of the Internet and the widespread audience it offers them, with these journalists being able to express their views and opinions to people who otherwise wouldn’t have the chance to hear it. Online news has significantly contributed towards the 24/7 news cycle that people across the globe are subjected to today, where citizens are inundated with information from all angles every minute of the day (Mythen, 2010). The real benefit of online news is that it allows people to pick and choose what information is important to them, as opposed to watching the 6pm news every night for the one or two stories that you may find relevant (Kranzberg, 1985). Some have argued that this is its downfall as people only ever interact with popular news, reducing the impact of news that should be important (Dahlgren, 1995). However, the increased interactivity of news allows people to discuss the stories they find with their friends, as their friends do with them, which allows for the