Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of social media on politics
The influence of social media on politics
The influence of social media on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of social media on politics
During the 2014 midterm election, analysts recorded the lowest voter turnout since World War II (DelReal). Only 36.4 percent of the eligible voting population cast ballots, which illustrates the continuing decline in midterm election voting participation (DelReal). While the results are disappointing, analysts are not shocked; since the 1964 election, when voter turnout was almost 49 percent, political participation has experienced continual decreases (DelReal). The decline cannot be ignored, as all people must participate in government processes in order to promote freedom of speech. Therefore, the United States of America must address the issue of low political participation, but this is a complicated task. One solution, which appears to …show more content…
be extremely effective, is harnessing the wide range of entertainment, particularly social media, to increase political participation. Numerous studies have been conducted to illustrate the viability of entertainment as a solution to this problem, although more research must be conducted in order to further promote political participation in the country.
Many studies have analyzed the impact that Facebook exerts on political involvement. One study was conducted on the Congressional midterm election day of 2010, when over sixty million users on Facebook received a special message encouraging them to vote. These users observed messages at the top of their news feed pointing to the nearest poll places, offering a place to select “I Voted,” and displaying a list of their friends who had already voted. Two smaller groups, with roughly six-hundred thousand people each, were the control groups. One group was given voter-encouragement messages without reference to the behavior of Facebook friends. The other did not receive any voting-related messages. The researchers also analyzed the voting behavior of 6.3 million subjects using records available to the public. The study found that “the Facebook social message increased turnout directly by about 60,000 voters and indirectly through social media contagion by another 280,000 voters, for a total of 340,000 additional votes” (Bond et al, 5). Therefore, online political messages do contribute to a visible difference in voting behavior. Facebook, as a specific source of entertainment, can be used to positively impact voter …show more content…
turnout. The findings have ramifications not only for people of eligible voting age, but for all social media users as well, as political messages may influence all people to become more involved in government operations. Social media is not the only form of entertainment media that may be studied to determine its political impact. In another study, the authors analyze the political relevance of graphic novels. When research is expanded to include a greater range of entertainment, an increasing number of connections between politics and entertainment will be established. With regard to the political campaigns, Holbert et al. state “political message providers are proposed to consider the audience actively and strategically utilizing various media channels while the audience is refined as individual ‘consumers’ or ‘enjoyers’ rather than ‘subjects’ of ‘mass education’” (439-40). Therefore, entertainment must be viewed as an individualized experience in order to exert a significant impact on political engagement, for broadcasting general messages to a large group does not personalize the experience. Other studies analyze engagement in political studies online and offline, with a focus on the role of social networking sites on socioeconomic status.
Class differences, particularly those concerning the amount of education, are eminent in online, offline, and social networking site (SNS) activity. However, the class differences are less noticeable in the SNS sphere. Furthermore, political engagement on SNS drastically increased between 2008 and 2012, when the survey was conducted. According to the Pew Research Center, “the number of social networking site users has grown from 33% of the online population in 2008 to 69% of the online population in 2012.” With this increase comes a notable number of SNS users that claim their SNS activity that led them to conduct additional research and become involved in social and political issues. Lastly, despite the growth of online platforms designed specifically for political activities, “Americans’ day-to-day political conversations mostly occur offline” (Smith). The source illuminates the wide range of factors that could influence one’s political activity in this new era of technological advancements. Politicians must be weary of their campaign strategies, as a strategy that combines online messages with offline messages appears to be most
effective. There is a considerable amount of controversy over the influence of entertainment on politics. Some experts argue that entertainment does not impact political engagement. While the amount of political information transmitted through the television and the internet has increased, knowledge of politics has not noticeably changed. Prior proposes that with a variety of choices in media, people are now able to more efficiently select the content they prefer. Those who prefer news will utilize the copious political information from this outlet to increase their knowledge of politics, thus becoming more likely to vote. On the other hand, people who favor entertainment will disregard the news, which makes this group less likely to vote. To test his theory, Prior conducted a survey of 2,358 residents of the United States. The results indicated that “new media do indeed increase political knowledge and involvement in the electoral process among some people… other people take advantage of the greater choice and tune out politics completely… people’s media content preferences become the key to understanding the political implications for new media” (Prior 587). Prior addresses entertainment in a new way. Instead of covering the way all individuals react to political messages through entertainment as a whole, the study suggests that different groups of individuals may react in a unique way. Thus, the individual’s preference of media must be considered when conducting these studies. Other studies support this finding and expand the research to include the impact of SNS on civic engagement, including both protesting and voting. Analyzing data from thirty-six studies, Boulianne attempted to cover a wide range of populations, including youth and people not living in the United States. Contained in these studies were 170 distinct coefficients, or single factors that would be studied to determine the correlation with SNS use. Based on self-reported surveys, the studies range in the number of respondents, with some as few as 250 and others as large as 1,500. The study found that “the metadata provide little evidence that the social media aspects of the campaign were successful in changing people’s levels of participation. In other words, the greater use of social media did not affect the likelihood of voting or participating the campaign” (Boulianne 534). However, it is difficult to determine causation within a study, and the researchers retain a cautious attitude toward the results of the study. Therefore, while some experts may disagree that entertainment positively influences political behavior, more research must be conducted to provide a definite conclusion. Since the age of social media is still young, researchers must adjust to this change and update studies with new information. For now, the solution to the low levels of political involvement in the United States population does remain, at least partially, grounded in entertainment. Entertainment, especially social media, should be utilized to encourage political engagement through voting, protesting, campaigning, or other activities. This is not to imply that face-to-face communication should be disregarded, as offline behavior still plays a large role in political strategy. However, with the massive number of people that now use the internet for everything from online shopping to quick news reports, people are exposed to a plethora of information from a variety of sources. If information about politics is made more readily available online, additional people would become involved in the politics of the United States.
The "silent majority" of the American people is now accepted as the status quo, the way things always have been and will be. Voter turnout is now the litmus test for political participation. Non-voters are becoming rampant in our democracy, with voter turnout hovering around a low 60% for general elections. At this rate, a candidate would have to win over 80% of that 60% vote in order to have true majority support. Thus, inactivity in voting threatens the very legitimacy of our government. In the recent November 7, 2013 midterm election, a few counties reported a mere 4% of eligible voters actually participated, in some cases to vote for a policy referendum that would aff...
Voting is one of the citizens’ rights living in a country. In the past, not everyone can vote. Voting used to be for only white American men. However, our ancestors fought for that rights. Eventually, any American who are older than eighteen can vote, despite their race or gender. In addition, voter turnout is used to keep track of the voting. It is the percentage of eligible voters who cast a ballot in an election. Unfortunately, the voter turnout has been decreasing over time, and it means that there are less and fewer people who actually show up and vote. This essay will discuss the voter turnout in Harris County, Texas.
"Miller light and bud light…either way you end up with a mighty weak beer!" This is how Jim Hightower (a Texan populist speaker) described the choices that the U.S. electorate had in the 2000 elections. This insinuates that there is a clear lack of distinction between the parties. Along with numerous others, this is one of the reasons why the turnout is so low in the U.S. elections. In trying to explain the low figures at the U.S. elections, analysts have called American voters apathetic to indifferent to downright lazy. I disagree that the 50% (in recent elections) of voters that fail to turnout to vote are lazy and that they have just reason not too. I will also show that the problem lies within the system itself in that the institutional arrangements, electoral and governmental, do not create an environment that is conducive to mass participation. I will address these main issues and several others that have an effect on voter participation. In doing so I will compare America to other established democracies.
The United States national elections have been experiencing a steady decline of eligible voters showing up to vote. This steady decline has been ongoing since experiencing a significant increase in voter turnout from 1948 through 1960. Over the years there has been significant, meticulous research done to try to pinpoint the cause of the decline in voter turnout over years. All of this research has led to the production of an enormous number of literatures written on the perceived causes. The vast amount of literature produced has led to a number of competing explanations about this decline. The quest for the answer to the question of, why this decline in voter turnout, is very important for an overwhelming majority of Americans and our democratic system because the people/voters can only truly be represented by our government if all eligible voters go out and vote. For this paper I will examine four theories that attempt to explain the decline. The four theories that I will discuss are voting barriers, campaign contributions, negative campaign advertising, and finally the cultural explanation. However, through thorough exploration and critiques of the strengths and weaknesses of these four theories, we will find that the cultural explanation theory is currently the most persuasive theory in the group. Finally, I will also explore some reasons as to why citizens do vote as well.
Among the many ways Americans can participate in politics, voting is considered one of the most common and important ways for Americans to get involved. The outcome of any election, especially at the national level, determines who will be making and enforcing the laws that all Americans must abide by. With this in mind one might assume that all Americans are active voters, but studies show the voter turnout is actually astonishingly low. With this unsettling trend it is important to know what statistics say about voter turnout as was as the four major factors that influence participation: Socioeconomic status, education, political environment, and state electoral laws, in order to help boost turnout in future elections.
One of the properties that allow social media to be an attractive tool to use by politicians is the ability to attract a massive audience of users. The Pew Research Center suggests that there is a growing number of social media users. A whooping 73% of US adults use the internet (Social Networking Fact Sheet). These...
The researchers present findings that indicate that a politician’s popularity in the voting booth may be related to the frequency with which the candidate is talked about on social media. The researchers goes on to discuss how further research may conclude that social media has a bigger impact on voting outcomes than traditional forms of media, and how that could potentially shape the future of voting.
Social media has changed the way that people interact with one another for the rest of time. People can use social media to share their lives, opinions, and more importantly their political views. Some of the most popular social media platforms are Facebook, where one can post their own thoughts along with pictures and video, Twitter, where one posts short messages, Instagram, where one posts pictures along with captions, Tumblr, where one can post a variety of different media, and Snapchat, where one can share videos and picture with their friends for a short amount of time. Now that people are able to share whatever they would like on the internet, some have used this as a way to spread political initiatives through these platforms. Social
Three of the most popular social media sites are Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube (Alexa, 2011b). These sites have different uses for diverse kinds of people. For a normal person, Facebook or Twitter might be a website that is used to connect with friends and family. However, research suggests that, “...it soon became apparent that social media could be used for other political purposes, from simply providing a forum for like-minded political dissidents to voice their opinions, to being used for organising and instigating major political riots and even revolutions (Earl and Kimport, 2011; Papic and Noonan, 2011).” This is an important fact to consider whi...
The 2008 presidential election was historic. The United States elected its first African-American president and the use of the internet and social media greatly influenced the way elections played out for the first time in history. This election set a precedent for the way politicians could use social media to reach out to voters who they may not otherwise have a connection with. Mass media and social media changed the way elections played out by increasing voter intelligence, encouraging young people and people of color to vote, and spreading propaganda via the internet.
Social media including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Flicker, internet websites, and blogs are becoming mainstream attracting a younger more technology savvy voter. Many candidates in the last elections learned to use these mediums so not to overlook tech savvy voters and learned how to use these to their advantage. Candidates took to the internet to raise awareness, state views, and even successfully raised donations. Social media was able to provide instant feedback on the standing of a candidate often days or weeks sooner than a more traditional poll.
Social media such as twitter and Facebook is an important tool for people get information and communicate with others in modern society. A report from Pew Research Center shows that 64 percent of people get news from social media(Beres). Almost everyone has their own social media account and so does politician. Social media citizens an assess to know and communicate with politicians. Donald Trump, who is the candidate of president in the United States, is very good at using social media. He used to write a tweet that described Clinton aide Huma Abedin as “a major security risk” and “the wife of perv slazebag Anthony Wiener.” Once he wrote, his million followers on Twitter can see it(Carr). Trump attract audiences by using a lot of exaggerated words and emotions, while some candidates that are not good at using those media skills might not as popular as Trump. In this situation, many politicians might only improve their skill to attract citizens’ attention by using social media. They might either belittle their competitors or show their personal life to satisfy their follower. What they are more focus on is not the politics itself but the skill that can catch attentions. However, as a politician, trying to solve problems citizens worrying is primary thing that should do. On the other hand, everyone can post their own opinions in social media and some opinions might
Political campaigns in the 21st Century have changed over the past years, especially because of the growing presence that social media platforms have received in the everyday life of society.
Rainie, Smith, Schlozman, Brady, and Verba (2012) present that social media is starting to become a feature of political and civil engagement for many Americans. Rainie concludes this finding from analyzing a survey that asked users about civic engagement using social networking sites like Twitter. They found that 60% of American adults use social networking sites like Facebook or Twitter, 39% of them have done at least one of eight civic or political activities with social media. The demographic that uses social media for civic activities the most were younger social media users that ranged from age 18-29 years old. They concluded from the survey that younger users were more likely to post their own thoughts about issues and encourage others to take political action while older users were more likely to stay
Internet has been acknowledged as one of the most efficient way to collect and reflect public opinions, for that people with different classes and races can express their opinions with no obstacles in virtual network spaces. People can speak out whatever they want just by typing on the keyboard within a second. Dr. Heather Savigny mentions in her article “Public Opinion, Political Communication and the Internet” that “The expansion of the internet as a new method of communication provides a potential challenge to the primacy of the traditional media and political parties as formers of public opinion” (1). People realized that the power of internet public opinion in the focus on social issues can be used as a weapon to affect government decision-makings. However, does public opinion only brings positive effects?