Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A Paper on Political Ideologies
A Paper on Political Ideologies
Political ideologies in the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A Paper on Political Ideologies
Above, one can see the very simple political cartoon. It has been passed around the internet and has no definite author as of late. The message, however, is definite and clear. The goal is to define and proke a choice between the most prominent political ideologies, Capitalism and Communism.
To begin and the foremost point, the artist utilizes the modes of discourse. Starting off, to separate their premise of political ideology, the artist used Classification and division. The ideology is divided along the economic axis, and is classified using the means of production, notably the ownership thereof. Next, the artist uses Comparison and contrast to differentiate Capitalism and Communism, to highlight the cartoon’s purpose. In comparison, both
…show more content…
The cartoon pleads to one’s personal feelings and inner self to make a decision between the competing ideologies. The presented options carry weight with one personally because the workers represent an ordinary person. Under Capitalism, the workers have chains, they are enslaved. They are frowning, they’re overworked and tired. Behind the machine, there’s the boss who does not work himself, but sets egregious quotas and forces the men into exhaustion. This is seen as not a problem because the boss ‘owns’ the machine. For this, the product of labor, the wealth, goes to the boss while only a sliver trickles down to the workers as a wage. Because of this imbalance, the boss maintains control and the workers are kept enslaved. In contrast, the cartoon shows the situation under Communism to be different. The workers on this side do not have chains. They are smiling. They work at an sustainable pace; they’re not overworked. The reason behind this and the key contrast between the sides is that there’s no boss. On this side there’s no ruling class. The machine is the worker’s, the peoples, and as such the product, the wealth, is theirs. Now the implication of the cartoon is a decision. What is preferable to us, the workers? Decide whether or not to be bound in slavery by the bourgeois. Everyone must question themselves for what they believe. This personal decision is Pathos, an appeal to the emotions of the workers by the
The first cartoon is with Theodore Roosevelt wearing hunting gear and holding a gun. There’s bull sitting on the moon reading the newspaper. There are different names for this political cartoon, like don’t shoot, I’ll come down, the beef trust and et cetera. This cartoon was made when TR was “trust busting” small corporations. After Jungle by Upton Sinclair, people and TR wanted changed. So changes were made and the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1907, which made sure that inspections are made before meats are processed and ready to be delivered.
Deriving from the Dutch word “karton” and the Italian word “cartone,” a cartoon is “ a form of two dimensional illustrated visual art” (toonsmag). A cartoon can typically range from being a child’s pastime to going as far as confronting the socioeconomic and political issues in a country. People known as editorial cartoonists draw these cartoons, often called political or editorial cartoons, using tools such as hyperbole, artistic proficiency, and satire in order to poke fun at and inform the public about a certain issue. One famous editorial cartoonist who is known for his cartoonist is Gary Markstein. “The Iraq Surge”, one of Markstein’s lesser-known works, and the “Five years in Iraq” both deal with the Iraq War. The Iraq war was an invasion
The leaders of big business didn’t give workers the rights they deserved. In the text, Captains of Industry or Robber Barons?, it states, “Workers were often forbidden to strike, paid very low wages, and forced to work very long hours.” This evidence is a perfect example of the dehumanization of workers. The employers treated their workers like interchangeable parts, which were easily replaced. The big business leaders started paying less attention to the working conditions, and more to the production rates, and money. They didn’t care about worker’s family or the worker’s wellbeing. Due to the horrible working conditions, the workers were more likely to be injured, and sometimes, die. The capitalists didn’t give their employees the rights and respect they deserved, because to them they were just unskilled, cheap labor. If the workers were unhappy, they would easily replace them with other unskilled workers. That’s why they were considered interchangeable parts. This evidence shows the big business leaders only cared about money, and didn’t treat their workers
Though the rewards are pleasing to the ear, the path to obtaining the benefits of communism is a violent one. This strict governing idea was derived from Communist Manifesto, a book written by two German economists, Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels, who declare that many problems in society are caused by the unequal distribution of wealth. These two believe that “Communism deprives no man of the ability to appropriate the fruits of his labour. The only thing it deprives him of is the ability to enslave others by means of such appropriations.” To achieve the goal of happiness and prosperity for all, the lines that distinguish the differences between the rich and poor must be erased. Obviously, the rich will never voluntarily give up their goods or status; therefore the figureheads must force equality among the citizens. Communism places their citizens, whether they be the wealthy or the laborers, into working classes that specify their contribution to the government. With such balanced placement of the people, individuality is impossible for any single person to achieve.
While this is a dramatized statement regarding the plight of the worker under the new machine driven industrial system, rhetoric such as this did represent the fears of the working class. Over time as industrialization appeared more commonly there emerged more heated debates between the working class and business owners.
...ng this simplistic definition of capitalism which means that there will be “winners” and “losers” to this relationship. The focus upon the “bottom line” leaves little to no room for the consideration of social consequences such as unemployment and poverty. The disconnection that capitalism creates enables itself to flourish thus limiting the potential to achieve socio-economic justice. Fundamentally changing the way capitalism operates requires a political shift in power dynamics. Consumers who do play a role in how the economy is structured are needed to be brought back to consciousness by demanding justice.
The Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, a period of political turmoil in Europe. Its meaning in today’s capitalistic world is a very controversial issue. Some people, such as the American government, consider socialism taboo and thus disregard the manifesto. They believe that capitalism, and the world itself, has changed greatly from the one Marx was describing in the Manifesto and, therefore, that Marx’s ideas cannot be used to comprehend today’s economy. Others find that the Manifesto highlights issues that are still problematic today. Marx’s predicative notions in the Communist Manifesto are the key to understanding modern day capitalism.
Commodity fetishism has blinded people into believing that value is a relationship between objects, when in reality, it is a relationship between people. This in turn, prevents people from thinking about the social labor condition workers have to endure; they only care and value about how much objects costs. They think that the source of the value comes from the cost, but it truly comes from labor (FC). Through this objectification stems alienation and estrangement. Marx starts with the assumption that humans have an intrinsic quality. As human beings, individuals like to be create and manipulate his or her environment. Creating is a part of people; therefore, people their being into their creations. However, Marx postulates that capitalism and specialized division of labor separates that working class from their creations in four ways- through alienation from the product, the labor process, one’s species-being, and humanity itself. The working class suffers through this hostility to make create more wealth for owners of factories. They get trapped in a cycle to make products for profit, but as automation advances, machines begins to take over people’s jobs; therefore, there less employment opportunities available, which in turn allows factory owners to decrease wages and exploit and devalue the working class (EL). In the The Poverty
The "Communist Manifesto" Mountain View College Reader. Neuleib, Janice. A. Cain S., of Kathleen. Ruffus, Stephen. The.
In an editorial from the Communist International, the author explains, “The Weimar regime is really the bloody class terror of the bourgeoisie under the mask of democracy. Industrialists are striving for the class dictatorship of the bourgeoisie…” (Doc 2). A statement like this changes the thoughts of the German people, which is the audience of this editorial. Calling out the Weimar republic for being a conspiracy to strive for upper class dictatorship wouldn’t have helped the image of the republic, and a republic without a good foundation of citizen agreement will not be stable. This can also be seen in George Grosz’s “The Toads of Property,” where the upper class factory owners are playing poker and the working class is sadly walking around in the background. Not only does the cartoon give the appearance that the factory owners are more powerful than the working class, but it also gives the impression of an unsteady economy that is occupying the working class’ mind with worry. Since the government didn’t seem to care about the WC’s condition, it gives them another reason to not like the Weimar Republic other than the ideas expressed in the
... between the classes becomes more apparent, eventually, a social revolution is anticipated. Eventually this revolution would result in socialism, where there is no dominating class; rather, socialism consists of cooperative production. In “A Bug’s Life”, the ants begin to be skeptical of the system and start to plan a revolt. Together, the ants, which are symbolic of the proletariats, band together to overthrow the grasshoppers’ dominion. In the end, they all live as equals, which is representative of socialism. This self-emancipation of the working class is consistent with the ideology of Marxism and social movements that struggle to overcome domination and exploitation.
In western capitalist societies, communism is portrayed as a system that practices wealth distribution where everyone makes the same amount of money and own the same exact things with no competition. In reality Marx’s idea of communism gives people the chance to develop their skills and advance their potential to the fullest extent, that is actually denied under the capitalist class system. Marx agrees with rousseau that political and civil rights are important and gives the people more power but he takes it further and argues that in order for people to be truly free they must have control on their labor and their production by democratizing the economic and labor system.
Political texts are representative of individual, shared and competing ideologies within a society and can be constructed in various forms to enhance their diverse contexts and inherent perspectives. Ultimately, political perspectives and society shape one another; they’re inextricably linked and cyclical in nature.
In stark contradiction to pre-industrial capitalistic characteristics, were those conditions that were endured by workers under capitalism and its emphasis on modern industrialized manufacturing. To Marx it seemed as if the ordinary factory worker was viewed as being no more than a replaceable cogwheel in an enormous and emotionless machine driven only by quotas and greed.
In a capitalistic society, the owner exploits his workers by draining them of their self-worth. A worker gets paid only for his sustenance as the product he works on gets sold by the capitalists in the interests of creating a profit. This leads to the worker’s alienation from his surroundings and his work leading to the estrangement from the process of production. The existing social relationship is inherently antagonistic in nature and will give rise to class struggle that will eventually lead to the collapse of capitalism, and the creation of a new