Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research topic on organisational change in the police
Police leadership
Police leadership: a search for principles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A police officers job has many problem solving factors that occur on a daily basis. These factors can affect attitudes, behavior, and the influence that supervisors, which can lead to negative and positive effects. The attitudes of both the supervisor and the officers can determine how well the problem solving is handled along with learning the dynamics of the particular task. If the problem solving isn’t handled correctly, it is hard to regulate the multiple encounters that can transpire on a day to day basis. I will start by describing a brief summary of the organization, challenges that the organization faces, relevant causes of the problem, and how leadership plays a role. Furthermore, I will provide in depth analysis using a particular …show more content…
Regardless of the size of the police department, without effective leadership, a police force would collapse. In my specific job on the police department I answer to my sergeant, my lieutenant, and my captain. Very rarely does someone in my position have any interaction with the chiefs. But the leadership that I deal with didn’t start there. Leadership started at home, being a parent and then when starting the police academy, the leader 1 and leader 2 had the role of leadership for cadets. Once out of the academy, my field training supervisor was my leader. Once I was on the streets, I had a sergeant, lieutenant, and captain would become my leaders. Kinicki and Fugate list five core traits that leaders possess. These traits include; intelligence, dominance, self-confidence, a level of energy and activity, and task-relevant knowledge. With my short time on the department, I have met many leaders that have many different responsibilities, but generally all have the same goal in mind, to effectively manage and lead the people under me. Kinicki and Fugate also state that there is a difference between leaders and managers. “Leaders play a key role in creating a vision and strategic plan for an organization. Managers, in turn, are charged with implementing the vision and strategic plan” (Kinick & Fugate, …show more content…
My extraversion may allow me to express my opinion to a supervisor in regards to the issues that I’ve discussed or may give me the opportunity to teach a cadet class in regards to organizational behavior. My conscientiousness shows that I would be dependable if asked to seek out ideas based off the particular subject and the persistence of not only me but the community as well may hopefully cause some of these problems to change. My openness to experience will allow keeping a broad-mind about the subject and looking for other resources or ideas that may lead to potential change in the future. In conclusion, the organizational behavior plaguing the police departments national wide is a growing problem. While researchers may continue to come up with ideas and ways to change the problems, the departments need to utilize more resources to start making the changes necessary to restructure employees and focus on changing behaviors and attitudes. While doing this, the communities and the departments need to determine what styles of policing are the most effective and most suitable for their ongoing relationship. Without the conjoined effort by both parties, the problems will only
There is change trying to happen, in a rural Pacific Northwest police department (PD) that is nestled in the corner of Washington’s Olympic Peninsula. This Department serves a diverse population of 9000 people and encompasses roughly 4 mi.², as well as being surrounded by water on three of those four sides. When evaluating police departments, according to the state and national averages it is undersized for the population it serves. As one would expect it is a department with a long and rich 126-year history JCHS (2014). As well, as with the majority of all municipal departments, it has suffered its ups and downs, as well as suffering and prospering through healthy and poor administrations.
Toxic leadership, likely found in all agencies at some point, and the general awareness of toxic leaders with whom individual officers have worked, makes this a real problem for law enforcement agencies. Knowing the root and cause of this type of leadership helps develop understanding on the part of those that can effect a change in leadership within an agency. Comprehending the methods by which such environments develop and their negative impact on the agency as a whole - via individual officers’ experiences, opens the doors on hidden collusion that destroy morale.
As a police officer there are a lot of social psychological factors that come into play every day. You must constantly be helping people, not discriminating, unbiased in every way, and of course keeping an open mind at all times. All of the theories presented here should be taught to police officers, while they are in training, to help them to be able to handle these situations if any arise.
The leadership approaches of David Harman and Frank Viturello, have greatly affected their organization as a whole as they lead and demonstrate by example. Chief Harman and Viturello are both strong advocates of organizational leadership. What made these men stood out is their exceptional working relationship and partnership with each other regarding leadership and problem solving (Haberfeld, 2013). Both chiefs’ came from different ethnic backgrounds and experienced discrimination early in their careers and wanted to make a difference with new generations of police officers. The Chiefs’ had powerful envisions of innovative changes within their organization, and had revamped the recruitment policy in order to create ethnic diversification (Haberfeld, 2013). A criminal justice manager must select a style of leadership that will accomplish his or her mission, and most importantly, selecting a style of management that will attract qualified Asian-American applicants towards a career in law enforcement (Shusta et al.,
...e state and federal level. Smaller local departments often suffer from budget cuts which limit the number of officers they can higher.
This paper is an attempt to articulate the organizational change that is taking place within the Police Department and how the existing norms, culture, and organizational profile affect the desired change, as well as the resistance to change that might be affecting the change agent and the personnel affected by the change.
Presently many of us have learned that managers are primarily administrators who have learned to write business plans, utilize their resources and keep track of progress. We must learn that we are not limited by job title, and that means we can utilize our management skills in any position that we are in. We must also know that we can use our leadership skills in the same situations. On the other hand we have also learned that leaders are people who have an impact on those that surround them. The main difference that separates these two roles is that management is a function that must be utilized in any type of business, and leadership is the relationship that the leader has with his followers, which in turn can motivate and energize the organization.
All organizations, especially law enforcement agencies, require leadership. Maintaining a dependable leadership structure is key to the success of any organization. The philosophy of the modern style of police leadership involves a leader who is strong, competitive and unreceptive to change. Police leadership is based from an autocratic style which is founded on integrity and courage, embracing teamwork, involvement and shared leadership (Cordner & Scarborough, 2010). This style of leadership works well in an emergency situation in which rapid decision making and strict control is needed. The negative aspect to this style of leadership is the inability of the organization to function with the absence of leadership.
As Lopez and Ensari (2014) claim “… autocratic leadership style is more associated with the military, and seen as old-fashioned” (p. 20). As society continues to evolve, expand, and question the interactions law enforcement professionals have with their communities the old fashioned autocratic leadership style is no longer effective. Government agencies are now reevaluating the way in which they operate within changing societal standards, and leaders within these agencies must evolve and change to accommodate their followers, the agency changes, and the communities they
The changes in police culture have found some errors in managing this changes. Drawing on Kotters article, 50% of the companies failed in this error, by not establishing a great sense of urgency for changes which means that they are not setting right expectation, right goals and visions for the company which has the potential to jeopardise the future of the organisation. “Without motivation, people won’t help and the effort goes nowhere.” (Kotter 2007). As for the New Zealand Police they want urgent actions for changing the culture and to improve performance wit...
This has caused many political problems with both department operations and the communication with fellow law enforcement agencies that are needed for police agencies to correctly do their job. Even with the rumor that the police union has been allowed to selected the leadership at the discretion of the mayor. The organization and the management of the department subsections have been created based off of preferences of the commanders. This has cause the untrained first line supervisor to become more involved in decision-making, which has caused damage to the police image in the public eyes. There have been complaints internal and external with rule bending and violations that before would have been addressed by supervisor.
Law enforcement agencies serve the community in the form of enforcing the laws written by the legislature. They protect the people, prevent crime, and protect civil rights and liberties. The laws written by the legislature are ever changing and adapting to the world we live in. The law enforcement agencies carry out these laws with enforcement and judicial side handles those individuals that have broken these laws. Law enforcement agencies have multiple functions and sizes depending on geographical size and the population of the city/ county. The roles in a county agency may differ from a city or municipal agency. Counties have to cover larger geographical areas as compared to the municipal or city agency that is only responsible for the incorporated areas. The agency with greater availability to financial support is the agency that has the means to devise a team to focus on certain crime areas. All departments regardless of size must have someone at the top of the rank structure. A police department operates much like the military in which structure and chain of command is implemented. Quasi-military is a term used to describe the rank structure of today’s police departments (Grant and Terry 2012). From the bottom to the top of the r...
Some of the most notable comparisons that the police has with the military are the rank structure, the chain of command, and that they can both used weapons and force (Peak, 2014, p. 63). Other less notable comparisons is that they are both a bureaucracy meaning that the majority of the tasks, duties, regulations, and rules are made by a high rank official usually the police chief in local agencies and in state and federal agencies they are usually made by the state governor with the police chief or in federal agencies by congress and then all the rules and regulations must be follow by all police officers from the highest rank to the lowest rank similar to the way that the military works (Police Organization). A bureaucracy can be effective
Another aspect of leadership includes leadership traits such as being influential and inspirational. There also different contexts of leadership, e.g, leading oneself, leading other individuals, leading groups, leading organizations. Some traits that are often associated with being an effective leader include a measure of intelligence, high energy, self confidence, dominance, and a need for achievement. An effective, charismatic leader must lead by example. That leader must be able to know what is going on, the job or task that is being accomplished, and be able to lead the group into performing the task at hand successfully.
“Implementing POP in a police agency—and in its local government and community as well—is conceptually simple, but practically challenging” (Scott & Kirby). While I was reading “How to Prepare Yourself and the Agency”, I learned that by being engaged to problem solving in a long-run will make you an expert on problem solving. Not all agencies are the same, some of them have strategies to become pros at problem solving that others do not know about.