Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police body worn cameras essay
Impact of police officers wearing body cameras essay
Negative of body worn cameras in the law enforcement agencies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Police body worn cameras essay
The recent coverage of police killings have raised many questions and concerns and created lots of debates on law enforcement agencies and the proposal for police body cameras. As technology is growing at a rapid pace, Public Safety Administrations are taking full advantage of the new emerging technologies and implementing them into their programs in order to promote safety throughout the communities. Many law enforcement agencies are taking a full advantage of the body worn camera program as it has already impacted many agencies throughout the Unites States. Body cameras without a doubt accumulate important proof of police wrongdoing, and in spite of the fact that exploration on the impacts of body cameras is similarly constrained there …show more content…
This implementation progress should not be taken lightly due to various positive and negative effects in regard to the impact on community relationships, privacy concerns, management expectation, financial considerations and training policies. Despite the fact that body worn cameras have various advantages, they additionally bring up major issues on how this innovation is changing the connection between law enforcement agencies and the communities across the U.S. The public rely highly on the law enforcement to respond to an emergency situation and setting the police department at high standards. Law Enforcement agencies should make careful considerations when implementing the body worn cameras into their agencies and the public will expect the police to response with the body worn cameras to the scene therefore, they expect the video recording to be available during the time of need, thus, it will become more problematic for the law enforcement agencies to remove the new implemented program once it is set in …show more content…
By confronting the difficulties and costs of buying and deploying body worn cameras, creating laws, policies, and preparing its officers in how to utilize the cameras, the agency makes a sensible desire that the public and the news media will need to survey the activities of officers. With certain constrained special cases that this production will examine, body worn camera recordings should be made accessible to the general population upon request. It is vital to consider which level of government ought to be settling on the vital choices and decisions. With the wide rage of opportunities and the difficulties police body cameras may face, the laws and policies should be made and created at the state and the local level. “Considering the importance of police accountability and transparency as well as the diversity of America’s police departments, it is crucial that local lawmakers craft police body camera legislation that is appropriate for their constituencies” (Feeney, 2015).
More and more police department are adopting the utilization of the Body Worn Cameras, just few days ago, the Mobile police department announced that “officers shall activate the Body Worn Cameras when such use is appropriate to the proper performance of his or her duties, where recording are consistent with the policy and law” (Mobile Police Department, 2017). The
Have you ever heard of the idea of body-mounted cameras on police officers? If not, David Brooks will introduce you to the idea that was discussed in an article from New York Times called “The Lost Language of Privacy”. In this article, the author addressed both the positive and negative aspects of this topic but mostly concerned with privacy invasion for Americans. Although that is a valid concern but on a larger scale, he neglected to focus greatly on the significant benefits that we all desire.
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as:
Due to devastating events that have occurred between policemen and civilians; law enforcements find it liable for police officers to be suited with body cameras. In doing so it is thought to bring an increase in trust in the community, reduce brutality and crime, as well as elucidate good cops still around.
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
In 2014, the New York Police Department announced that it would begin a pilot program to have its officers wear body cameras while on duty (Bruinius). However, the issue of privacy invasion and confidentiality of officers and the public has arisen. Though Body cameras on police officers could help in some scenarios such as random crimes, or police to citizen behavior, they also threaten privacy. Body mounted cameras are an invasion of privacy not only for the officers but also for the citizens involved. According to Freund Kelly, “Police officers often go inside businesses, private property and private homes as part of their duties. When police officers have a warrant, or believe there is an emergency,
The researcher hypothesizes that the use of body-cameras on police officers would reduce the instances of gainful communication between civilians and law enforcement. The null-hypothesis is that the use of body-cameras on police officers will have no effect on gainful communication between civilian and law enforcement. In determining the implications of how body-cameras effects civilian behavior, the research will include a sampling survey of criminal justice students and information gathered from journal documents related to research on police body-cameras.
Police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it will build a trust between law enforcement and the community, it will decrease the amount of complaints against police officers, and lastly it will decrease the amount of police abuse of authority. In addition, an officer is also more likely to behave in a more appropriate manner that follows standard operating procedures when encountering a civilian. “A 2013 report by the Department of Justice found that officers and civilians acted in a more positive manner when they were aware that a camera was present” (Griggs, Brandon). Critics claim that the use of body cameras is invasive of the officers and civilians privacy.
Thesis: By implementing Body cameras there will be more effective ways to monitor police activity the ability to protect civilians and law officials will greatly increase. Today I would like to share more with everyone the huge issue police brutality plays in our society and hopefully by the end of my speech you will want police officers to wear mandatory body cameras as well.
The mission of implementing a body-worn camera system is to increase police legitimacy and procedural justice through impacting police officer decision-making that will subsequently reduce police misconduct, resulting in a reduction in officer complaints and levels of excessive use of force. The program will reduce liability and distrust of the police department by enhancing police legitimacy and procedural justice. Additionally, reductions in officer complaints and levels of excessive use of force will strengthen relationships with the community. The goal of the program is to improve officer decision-making through a body-worn camera system that increases supervision capabilities. Pros and Cons of the Program Pros
With each growing day, it becomes apparent the relationship and trust between police officers and citizens are rapidly diminishing. Particularly, with recent cases where police officers have been found not guilty of fatally shooting an unarmed man, planting evidence to ensure the suspect face jail time, or just simply committing police brutality. Police officers are given the task of protecting citizens and property, enforce laws, making arrests, issue tickets, investigate crimes and testify in court. However, who is given the responsibility to assure officers are not abusing their powers. Therefore, to ensure police officers are actively performing the duties of their job body cameras should be implemented to assure safety, accountability,
Should police officers be required to wear body cameras (SIRS)? This paper will examine viewpoint one, two and my
Police officers need to be equipped with body cameras to monitor their actions due to the recent uprising in police brutality cases. This camera would make so people could monitor the officers’ actions easier, and have less controversy over police shootings. The American civilians are looking for change in the way the police are monitored, and this is the change that Americans need. Body cameras are a camera that would be located on the outside of every vest that an officer wears. Body cameras can provide visual evidence of what is happening at the time of a crime and can be used in the court of law.
In recent years, police wearing body cameras has been gaining a lot of support and popularity. However, body cameras are more complex than most people realize. Cameras can be exceedingly expensive and raise privacy concerns for those being recorded. “But, the use of police body cameras is supported across political and racial demographics, as the following graphs (“Police Body Cameras.”).” There are countless cases of misconduct that have no evidence to prove someone guilty.
“Officers wearing cameras were 25.2% more likely to perceive the devices as being helpful during their interactions with the public” (Ready, Young). This quote draws attention to a current controversial issue in the United States. This controversy revolves around the decision about if police officers should wear body cameras or have dashboard cameras in their vehicles to increase both the officer and perpetrator’s safety. The safety of police officers in the United States needs to become a priority. While some officers currently wear body cameras and have dashboard cameras, there are many who do not.
The increased presence of surveillance cameras is almost compared to George Orwell’s novel from 1984, where he imagined a future in which people would be monitored and controlled by the government. One question that needs to be asked is: do the benefits of law enforcement security cameras outweigh the negative side to it? Although the invasion of privacy is a serious argument against law enforcement cameras, it should be seen as a valuable tool to help fight crime. As long as surveillance cameras are in public places and not in people's homes, privacy advocates should not be concerned. There are many benefits to having law enforcement security cameras, which people take for granted, and are quick to point out the negative.