Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Policing in today's society
The role of police in our society
Policing in today's society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Policing in today's society
It is easy for police to get caught up in the idea that it is them against the rest of society (Barkan, 2012). Many citizens in today’s democratic society have a negative or fearful view of our law enforcement. Think back to grade school, who was that one kid in class that everyone was annoyed by or despised? Most people would answer the teacher’s pet or the tattletale. We have grown up from a young age to have a negative view towards those that get us into trouble when we think we can get away with something we know is wrong. In the adult world, the police force can equate to those tattletales. The overall basis for a democratic society is freedom. We stress that freedom allows us to be individualistic. Herbert L. Packer, a law professor, charted out two ideas in our criminal justice system. The idea or crime control and due process are ideally two separate entities, but have been found in our criminal justice system to overlap (Barkan, 2012). Due to the fact that these two ideas overlap, causes tension within our democratic society. These ideas cause there to be a double edge sword. As stated in our textbook, “the more crime control we want, the less due process we have; the more due process we have, the less crime control we can expect.” (Barkan, 2012). Ideally, we would like to live in a society where everyone is treated equally regardless of race, gender, social class, etc. However, police have the difficult task of making sure arrests are made unbiased. While on the job, police must put all their personal opinions aside. They must provide everyone with an equal and fair chance. It is important in a democratic society for police to not know too much about the community they are policing. It allows them to ... ... middle of paper ... ... a distinction between the two in a society where individual freedoms are so highly valued. Is that not what the framers of the Constitution based the future of our nation on? The real question is, how far are police allowed to go when the blurry line of individual freedoms and public safety is in question? Everyday our law enforcement is faced with the same task, to follow the law and enforce it, while allowing society to maintain their individual freedoms and liberties that this country is founded upon. Works Cited Barkan, Steven E. Criminology: A Sociological Understanding. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2012. Print. Crew, B. Keith. “Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy?” Justice Quarterly (Mar. 1991): n. pag. Print. Marx, Gary T. “Police & Democracy.” The Encyclopedia of Democracy. N.p., 1995. Web. 7 Dec. 2011.
The two models of crime that have been opposing each other for years are the due process model and the crime control model. The due process model is the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. ( Answers.Com) Any person that is charged with a crime is required to have their rights protected by the criminal justice system under the due process model. The crime control model for law enforcement is based on the assumption of absolute reliability of police fact-finding, treats arrestees as if they are already found guilty. (Crime control model) This paper will compare and contrast the role that the due process and crime control models have on shaping criminal procedure policy.
The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).
This research proposal seeks to establish the level of police discretion used on duty. It aims to understand when it is appropriate for police to use discretion as well as given reasons for abusing their decisions. It focuses on issues with police discretion maintaining the responsibility to be ethical such as racial profiling, socioeconomic status and excessive force. Although police discretion can have positive factors, it also difficult to determine whether it is fair for police to make a decision during situations.
Discretion is defined as the authority to make a decision between two or more choices (Pollock, 2010). More specifically, it is defined as “the capacity to identify and to document criminal and noncriminal events” (Boivin & Cordeau, 2011). Every police officer has a great deal of discretion concerning when to use their authority, power, persuasion, or force. Depending on how an officer sees their duty to society will determine an officer’s discretion. Discretion leads to selective enforcement practices and may result in discrimination against certain groups of people or select individuals (Young, 2011). Most police officer discretion is exercised in situations with individuals (Sherman, 1984).
There are many different groups and societies throughout America. Some are looked at with high honors, while others may be scorned or treated badly. No matter what group someone is a part of, others may have different opinions about another group. After reading the “Untouchables”, by Jonathan Kozol, it is noticeable that not everyone gets along in the world. A group that is also scorned in today’s society is police officers because of racial tensions, hatred toward them, and how the news media has portrayed them.
A Critical Assessment In defining police ethics, ethical policing and police ethics are not synonymous or interchangeable connotations to or for one another. Aside from establishing a police role independently from establishing any definition of ethics or police ethics, the semantics tend to complicate the defining process. Some of these complications include, but are not limited to, sociological aspects, psychological conditions, or philosophical reasoning. Examples of sociological complications include historical, political, cultural, or economic aspects. Some psychological examples include one’s ability to discern sociological implications from other implications; namely, the condition of post-traumatic stress disorder, hydrophobia, or even weary dreams. Lastly,
Many of the citizens never had a one on one altercation with the law they only base their opinions on experiences with the police influence from other citizens, and that where they get their general image of the police. Many study indicates that police courteousness/friendliness in the direction of the citizen in a recent contact with police exerts the most powerful influence on the citizen’s general assessment of the police. However more studies have indicated that people’s previous overall views of police have sturdier influence on their evaluation of a succeeding specific contact than their evaluation of a specific contact has on subsequent overall views of police. The majority of the American public has not had face-to-face contact with a police officer. Most people respect the mass media as their primary source of information about the many crimes that go on around them, and crime news is the background for most mass media interpretations of police work. The implied message of much crime news is the lack of ability to catch offenders. A trend that is rising in a major way is in the news media. They are using it to focus their attention on a few
Gary Potter, The History of Policing in the United States,Pg 4). By controlling the police, politicians were able to maintain votes as well as enforce their policies. By doing this police were not truly helping citizens, they were helping corrupt politicians gain “support”(Dr. Gary Potter, The History of Policing in the United States,Pg 4) . Police would calm workforce riots(which were primarily contrived of minorities, mainly Blacks). (Victor Keppler,P.h.D, A Brief History, of Policing and Slavery in America,Pg 1) by brutally beating and arresting individuals. A minority or low income citizen exercising their free speech was too much for the upper class to handle alone. Ironically enough, this was the majority opinion being suppressed by the upper class minority. Even today police are implemented to solve civil unrest. Instead of getting to the root cause of the problem, law enforcement's primary reaction would tend to be violence or new restrictive policies first rather than actively becoming involved within a troubled community. Today politicians are
When examining the fundamentals of police legitimacy, the adoption of evidence based policing is one proven to be preferred. Proven ethical standers of transparency within police agencies back this practice of policing. The fundamental of this practice includes goals, objectives, and plans for the community. This also includes the development of the agencies employees using the latest proven techniques such as deescalating tactics. (Swanson 2017)
Civil liberties can be expensive for police as some of their actions can result into a lawsuit. Any officer found breaking another person rights can be expected to pay a large fine and their job could be on the line. As an officer is there to be a good respect to his city in protecting everyone and only acting upon a substantial crime if there is probable cause.
The ethical battles of criminology are being played in the streets with law enforcement and state/local laws attempting to find the methods that do not illegally encroach on civil liberties, but also give law enforcement the tools it needs to maximally solve and reduce crime. New laws are implemented to give the law enforcement those tools, but when people’s rights are infringed the courts have to determine the intricacies of the practices. Court rulings and especially the Supreme Court cases should be studied because it not only reviews the law and the legality for which the consequences for
The show Luke Cage shows this in the episode where he is being hunted down by the police force. These shows have almost turned police into the bad guys in some cases where the hero/lead is just trying to help people and the law gets in the way to stop them because they are vigilantes. Which yes technically the police are just doing their jobs and trying to get someone off the streets who is in some cases hurting other people. Some of the shows, especially in the DC comics universe as well as in Marvel, show the police as an ineffective figurehead who is more concerned with bad PR from vigilante justice than they are with actually fighting crime.
Law enforcement faces ethical decisions on a daily basis due to their responsibilities in protecting its citizens. The decisions they make affect the views of society towards police departments. With the use of police discretion, officers include various criteria in making those decisions. Control mechanisms contribute to the enforcement of laws that constantly change, directly changing an officers discretion in situations where decision making plays an intricately significant role.
Across America, police have been involved in scandals and drugs. They are abusing the power that they have been given. The communities have begun not to trust the police because of their conduct toward the citizens. People have been beaten and harassed by the guys in blue. People in the communities have seen the police push individuals around and take things from individuals for no reason. People receive the wrong message. The public no longer can see a difference between the police and criminals.
Police decisions can affect life, liberty, and property, and as guardians of the interests of the public, police must maintain high standards of integrity. Police discretion concerning how to act in a given situation can often lead to ethical misconduct (Banks 29).