Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Addressing cultural diversity
Addressing cultural diversity
Cultural diversity's influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A basic human need, the sense of belonging, can turn simplistic things into symbols of “us” vs. “them”. The human mind has a tendency to categorize people into social groups. And often these social groups can create this mentality toward people who may be different than us in some way. “Rituals and Traditions: it Takes a Tribe” by Berreby claims that humans either naturally or subconsciously try to become a part of a “Tribe.” This claim is presented in the article, “Playing Indian” where Americans according to Deloria have usually played Indian in order to themselves as a “nation”. People are willing to do anything to belong a part of group and willing to sacrifice for their enemies. Berreby and Deloria implement the idea of “us” vs. “them.” …show more content…
Berreby portrays this idea through his use of scoping the life of college students. This conveys the separation among nationality, while Deloria’ style implements American history to reveal the search of American identity.
Berreby’s style helps the audience personally relate to the concept of “us” and “them” by using his unique approach to connect a broad idea to a narrow matter. Berreby starts by presenting rhetorical questions to set up a casual conservation. Through questioning, he plans to evoke thoughts that help the audience connect and show how differentiating people into groups can be related in our tangible world. Furthermore, he mentions, “Spend time on a campus in a coming week, though, and you’ll see what he meant” illustrates that the author has left it to the audience to go experience and see the “tribes” surrounding them (Berreby 1). He began by stating a generic idea about college life and how students have started to …show more content…
place themselves in “tribes” to emphasize that they have already begun to generate the sense of belonging, “us,” and that now they automatically have a “them” for rivalry (Berreby 2). Moreover, he alludes “the same sort of feeling most Americans have about race, ethnic group, and religious,” to connect the idea of us, who identify with the norms, vs. them, who do not conform to our societal expectation, to America (Berreby 2). The author sways through his use of style that we are no different from the college students. He does not come out and admit that Americans are also divided into various groups, but rather implements the idea of broad to narrow, so the audience can understand the idea by themselves as it would be powerful. Berreby portraying a broad idea of the college life persuades the audience to see and agree with his point-of-view, then he goes on to connect the same idea to a slender view; this way he traps the audience into thinking that his idea is valid. While Berreby easily presents the idea of “us” vs.
“them” through his use of college student, Deloria expands the idea through event’s in the past that have raised issues of missing American identity. Deloria began by stating the Boston Tea Party to show the origin story of American identity representing that this mentality has been carried on for generations. He states, “a party of what looked like Indian men” to specify that the customers that Americans wore Native Indians allowed the colonist to free themselves by adopting the image of noble savages (Deloria 2). These customers were not intended to hide these men’s identities; they were used to create a new American Identity in opposition to British domination. There the colonial rebels played Indian to claim a Native American identity. It is based on desire of civilized order and “savage” freedom. By stating this, Deloria claims that Americans are wanting to have a traditional culture and rituals like the British but they do not want to be under British control. If Americans were to join them then they would not be superior which they did not want as “Americans [had the chance to] redefined themselves as something other than British colonists” (Deloria 2). Americans wanted to possess their own identity, the idea of “us,” that they wanted to be separated into their own group and be free from British order because the British, “them,” did not conform to our societal expectation. The author wants to show that American
identity, was not established at that time and that being the reason to reform Indians identity as their own as they did not want to stay under British control as they were our “rivals”. This separated us from British while creating a unique American identity with which we are only partially comfortable. Deloria wants to show that American have consistently used Indian representation to represent themselves, they have also consistently denied power to actual Native people. Differences have created spaces between social groups, races, religion and taken to a smaller scale even schools. This idea of being into separate groups has been going on for as long as time has been recorded as mentioned in Deloria’s article from Boston Tea Party; People are now able to see it clearly as it occurs in our society. It is natural for people to separate themselves from other by who they are or what they believe in. Although these differences are harmless in some extent, it can grow into larger issues that can effect of our society. Both “Rituals and Traditions: it Takes a Tribe” and “Playing Indian” interpret that humans want to feel part of a group in differing way.
The Essay, I have chosen to read from is ReReading America was An Indian Story by Roger Jack. The topic of this narrative explores the life of an Indian boy who grows up away from his father in the Pacific Northwest. Roger Jack describes the growing up of a young Indian boy to a man, who lives away from his father. Roger demonstrates values of the Indian culture and their morals through exploration of family ties and change in these specific ties. He also demonstrates that growing up away from one’s father doesn’t mean one can’t be successful in life, it only takes a proper role model, such as the author provides for the young boy.
The benefit of hindsight allows modern historians to assume that colonists in British America united easily and naturally to throw off the bonds of tyranny in 1775-1776. The fact that "thirteen clocks were made to strike together" (p.4) surprised even the revolutionary leader John Adams. Prior to the mid-1700s many residents of British North America saw themselves in regional roles rather than as "Americans", they were Virginians or Bostonians, regional loyalties trumped any other including those as British colonial citizens. In T. H. Breen's work, The Marketplace of Revolution, he offers an explanation for the sudden creation of a unique American identity. In his words, "What gave the American Revolution distinctive shape was an earlier transformation of the Anglo-American consumer marketplace" (p. xv). Breen contends that before Americans could unite to resist the British Empire, they needed to first develop a unity and trust with one another in spite of their regional differences. "The Marketplace of Revolution argues, therefore, that the colonists shared experience as consumers provided them with the cultural resources needed to develop a bold new form of political protest" (p. xv). The transformation of the consumer marketplace allowed the colonists of British North America to create a unique British and the American identity that would later result in revolution and the formation of a new nation. This trust based on consumption, Breen concludes, was absolutely necessary for the boycott movement to be an effective tool against the British government. "Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people protest remains a local affair easily silence by traditional authority" (p.1).
He feels that students who want to fit in finds a sense of haven in a college where there are limitless possibilities of being part of a group of “us” rather then them. “Throughout human history, most people have lived around some definable place – tribal ring, river junction, or Town Square. The reality is that modern suburbia is merely the latest iteration of the American dream, David Brooks” Before the construction of the first transcontinental railroad so called the pacific railroad many people lived within the resources of the town square, on the contrary people seek to find something new for them self as a means of traveling to the outer most terrains to express freedom to freely go as they please. In addition the similarities between a sense of us and the freedom of individuals who feel the need to go beyond the borders of their comfort zone is expressed through their decision to face uncertainty weather the choices they made is beneficial or
Nevertheless, in the author’s note, Dunbar-Ortiz promises to provide a unique perspective that she did not gain from secondary texts, sources, or even her own formal education but rather from outside the academy. Furthermore, in her introduction, she claims her work to “be a history of the United States from an Indigenous peoples’ perspective but there is no such thing as a collective Indigenous peoples’ perspective (13).” She states in the next paragraph that her focus is to discuss the colonist settler state, but the previous statement raises flags for how and why she attempts to write it through an Indigenous perspective. Dunbar-Ortiz appears to anchor herself in this Indian identity but at the same time raises question about Indigenous perspective. Dunbar-Ortiz must be careful not to assume that just because her mother was “most likely Cherokee,” her voice automatically resonates and serves as an Indigenous perspective. These confusing and contradictory statements do raise interesting questions about Indigenous identity that Dunbar-Ortiz should have further examined. Are
“Rituals and Traditions; It Takes a Tribe,” written by David Berreby and “Indians: Textualism, Morality, and the Problem of History” written by Jane Tompkins, both exemplify a typical controversial topic in the United States of America today. The US prides there self on the basis of freedom, and how Americans are made up of individuals with backgrounds from all around the world. Many consider the US to be a “melting pot”, a society where cultures are just blended together and not recognized fully on their own, where as others consider the US to be a “salad bowl”, where people of international cultures hold fast to their traditions and practices and coexist with the cultures around them. Both authors of the readings propose that generally speaking,
All in all, the colonists had felt an identity from the very beginning and forming a unity with one another was not difficult for them to achieve. They were prepared to tackle a situation together and they had begun referring to themselves as not British. To conclude, colonists had already a sense of identity and unity because they all had one common problem and they had to act together to deal with it.
Edmundson states, “they are, nearly across the board, very, very self-contained… there 's little fire, little passion to be found” (Edmundson, 3). Edmundson’s critic of consumer culture includes criticism of the students themselves and their lack of passion. Deresiewicz’s interpretation of youth culture undermines this “little passion” by looking for this youth to change the current wave of university culture and its lack of learning. Although it is important to note, that Edmundson’s critique of youth was the students of the 90’s while Deresiewicz appears hopeful for youth of the 2010’s. The youth of today and those of the 90’s in historical context may differ in their passions for higher education and change. While this timeline puts perspective on each context of the work, it is not unfair to criticize Edmundson’s superior tone when looking at the youth of his time. Edmundson’s viewpoint of college students distances himself from those needed most to make his vision of a better university culture come
The world is filled with many different types of societies and cultures. This is due to the fact that many people share dissimilar beliefs and ideas, as well as diverse ways of life. People lived under different circumstances and stipulations, therefore forming cultures and societies with ideas they formulated, themselves. These two factors, society and culture, are what motivate people to execute the things that they do. Many times, however, society and culture can cause downgrading effects to an assemblage if ever it is corrupt or prejudiced. Society and culture not only influences the emotions individuals have toward things like age differences, religion, power, and equality but also the actions they perform as a result.
Although the work is 40 years old, “Custer Died for Your Sins” is still relevant and valuable in explaining the history and problems that Indians face in the United States. Deloria book reveals the Whites view of Indians as false compared to the reality of how Indians are in real life. The forceful intrusion of the U.S. Government and Christian missionaries have had the most oppressing and damaging effect on Indians. There is hope in Delorias words though. He believes that as more tribes become more politically active and capable, they will be able to become more economically independent for future generations. He feels much hope in the 1960’s generation of college age Indians returning to take ownership of their tribes problems.
The speaker alone faces the impudence as she is the sole “Real Indian” standing there. The speaker never refers to a “we” or a collective that she is a part but only speaks to her own feelings, and while that is a strong message and feeling of how a true single person feels. The singularity reveals that she lacks a community that she is a part of and people around her who she knows feels the same way. There are “more fake Indians than real ones” in America (17). She is outnumbered by the cheap imitations that are violating and disregarding her culture.
“Is there a single trait of resemblance between those few towns and a great and growing people spread over a vast quarter of the globe, separated by a mighty ocean?” This question posed by Edmund Burke was in the hearts of nearly every colonist before the colonies gained their independence from Britain. The colonists’ heritage was largely British, as was their outlook on a great array of subjects; however, the position and prejudices they held concerning their independence were comprised entirely from American ingenuity. This identity crisis of these “British Americans” played an enormous role in the colonists’ battle for independence, and paved the road to revolution.
Stereotypes dictate a certain group in either a good or bad way, however more than not they give others a false interpretation of a group. They focus on one factor a certain group has and emphasize it drastically to the point that any other aspect of that group becomes lost. Media is one of the largest factors to but on blame for the misinterpretation of groups in society. In Ten Little Indians, there are many stereotypes of Native Americans in the short story “What You Pawn I Will Redeem”. The story as a whole brings about stereotypes of how a Native American in general lives and what activities they partake in. By doing so the author, Alexie Sherman, shows that although stereotypes maybe true in certain situations, that stereotype is only
Even before the eve of the Revolution, the colonists constantly had the image of independence lingering in the back of their heads. The colonists felt that they were first on a loose leash, and as that leash tightened over the years, the colonists began to understand their true culture and identity. As time passed, the colonists developed a greater sense of their identity and unity as Americans and by the eve of the Revolution, even though at first the colonists were unorganized and had problems with being united, they remained determined to gain their identity and unity as Americans.
Have you ever wondered how the world is dived? How come? . In “Harmony and the Dream” written by David Brooks he talks about the division faced in the world. Focusing on two types “ societies with and individualist mentality and ones with a collectivist mentality” (Brooks 1). He gives brief descriptions of what each is and how they differ. The purpose of the article is to bring awareness to the two different styles and why each might have come to be. Describing how each mentality is said to have developed, including an association with how individual cultures values may play a vital role in how they develop the mentality. I agree with the ideas Brooks described in the article, during the reading I was able to see how each culture is able
Light, J. R. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.