Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Allegory of the cave summary essay
Plato's theory of knowledge
Platos allegory of the cave
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Allegory of the cave summary essay
“The allegory of the cave” written by Plato, is an allegorical essay that acknowledges the human perception of how humans determine what is true. Plato believes the ideal of spiritual learning and philosophical learning, to gain knowledge on what is known to be true. The perception of how humans fear change and what they do not have knowledge of, limits their ability to know what is real. The allegory of the cave represents cave dwellers who are unable to turn their heads from being chained down. They are subjected to one perception of truth which is the shadows they have seen on the wall. The prisoners were forced to view shadows from objects that were held up in the cage, the shadows were illusions of images they cannot see. We receive …show more content…
For example, babies, babies are subjected to believe that the knowledge they receive from their guardians is true, because they have been subjected their whole life to believe that their parents are the truths to what they know, so when they are of age to learn their own perception of what is true, they question their childhood to see how do they determine if the knowledge they received is true. The Cave dwellers was held as prisoners had no option when it came to their beliefs, so they had no choice but to believe the shadows they see to be their idea of the truth. Plato writes “Then in every way such prisoners would deem reality to be nothing else than the shadows of the artificial objects.”(Plato 748c). Plato explains that the shadows are only illusion of what the cave dwellers know to be true. This brings the perception of ignorance, Plato writes “And if it were possible to lay hands on and to kill the man who tried to release them and lead them up, would they not kill him?.”(Plato 749). This “ignorance” that we confine ourselves to learn and believe that what we are taught is true, is instead of seeking behind our measures to find the “real”
In addition to the chained people, there are other people in the cave. Plato refers to them as the puppet-handlers and they are the ones holding those in the cave captive. (It is important to realize that the prisoners do not realize this--in fact, the prisoners do not even realize that they are being held captive since this existence is all they have ever known.) Walking behind the prisoners, the puppet-handlers hold up various objects found in the real world. Due to a fire that is burning the mouth of the cave, the prisoners are able to see the objects and each other only as distorted, flickering shadows on the cavern wall in front of them.
Portraying the prisoners inside the cave for a lifetime further describes his beliefs on how closed minded society is in his opinion. The “light outside the cave” explains how he feels knowledge is the source of light to everyone’s lives. Without knowledge, there is lack of light. Also, since society does not want to gain further knowledge, they will seem to stay stuck in the dark tunnel. Plato also uses personification to give reader insight on how someone may treat the earth and appreciate it. For example, Plato states “Clearly, he said, he would first see the sun and then reason about him.” The reasoning behind this is to explain how a man would reason with the sun as if it were an actual speaking person. The style of Plato’s writing gives readers an understanding on why his work is named “Allegory of the Cave”. The use of his rhetorical devices give deeper meanings to the Earth and the nature it
The situations that Goodman Brown and Armand face show that the fear and trauma that is experienced in learning the truth can lead to negative consequences and not being able to accept the truth for what it undoubtedly exists to be.
As people, we tend to believe everything we see. Do we ever take the time to stop and think about what is around us? Is it reality, or are we being deceived? Reality is not necessarily what is in front of us, or what is presented to us. The environment that we are placed or brought up has a great impact on what we perceive to be the truth or perceive to be reality. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave is one of the most significant attempts to explain the nature of reality. The cave represents the prisoners, also known as the people. They are trapped inside of a cave. They are presented with shadows of figures, and they perceive that to be reality. The cave can be used as a
The Allegory of the Cave, and The Myth of Sisyphus, are both attempts at explaining some aspect of the way people think or why humans do as observed. Both stories illustrate the same idea: without necessary and proper exposure to change, thinking is limited and ignorance is the direct product.
Plato’s logical strategy in the allegory of the cave is of deductive reasoning. Plato uses a cave containing people bound by chains which constrict their neck and legs in such a way that they are unable to turn around and there is a fire roaring behind them casting shadows on the wall. Since the prisoners cannot turn their heads to see what is casting the shadow the only thing they can perceive are the shadows and the sounds that seem to becoming from them. This is what Plato argues in the allegory of the cave “To them, I said, the truth would literally be nothing but the shadows of the images.”(The Allegory of the Cave Plato). Since these prisoners know nothing outside of the cave they are ignorant of the “light” and are content on seeing the shadows before them. Plato describes what it would be like for a prisoner to be released and forced to go out of the cave into the light Plato describes it as being “blinding”. Once the freed prisoner became accustomed to the light outside the cave it is believed by Socrates and Glaucon, inside Plato’s allegory that the prisoner would not want to return to the darkness from which he had “ascended”. Once the prisoner has become accustomed to the light Socrates said “I mean that they remain in the upper world: but this must not be allowed, they must be made to descend again among the prisoners in the den, and partake of their labors and honors, whether they are worth having or not”. (The Allegory of the Cave Plato) This is where Plato begins to start on the topic of leadership. Although Plato uses some cause and effect elements in his allegory, such as “Where as if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering after their own private advantage, thinking that henc...
The Allegory of the Cave is Plato's explanation of the education of the soul toward enlightenment. He sees it as what happens when someone is educated to the level of philosopher. He contends that they must "go back into the cave" or return to the everyday world of politics, greed and power struggles. The Allegory also attacks people who rely upon or are slaves to their senses. The chains that bind the prisoners are the senses. The fun of the allegory is to try to put all the details of the cave into your interpretation. In other words, what are the models the guards carry? the fire? the struggle out of the cave? the sunlight? the shadows on the cave wall? Socrates, in Book VII of The Republic, just after the allegory told us that the cave was our world and the fire was our sun. He said the path of the prisoner was our soul's ascent to knowledge or enlightenment. He equated our world of sight with the intellect's world of opinion. Both were at the bottom of the ladder of knowledge. Our world of sight allows us to "see" things that are not real, such as parallel lines and perfect circles. He calls this higher understanding the world "abstract Reality" or the Intelligeble world. He equates this abstract reality with the knowledge that comes from reasoning and finally understanding. On the physical side, our world of sight, the stages of growth are first recognition of images (the shadows on the cave wall) then the recognition of objects (the models the guards carry) To understand abstract reality requires the understanding of mathematics and finally the forms or the Ideals of all things (the world outside the cave). But our understanding of the physical world is mirrored in our minds by our ways of thinking. First comes imagination (Socrates thought little of creativity), then our unfounded but real beliefs. Opinion gives way to knowledge through reasoning (learned though mathematics). Finally, the realization of the forms is mirrored by the level of Understanding in the Ways of Thinking. The key to the struggle for knowledge is the reasoning skills acquired through mathematics as they are applied to understanding ourselves. The shadows on the cave wall change continually and are of little worth, but the reality out side the cave never changes and that makes it important.
Freedom in mind, freedom in nature, and freedom in subjectivity of individual are three kinds of freedoms. However, freedom should be expressed within the limits of reason and morality. Having freedom equals having the power to think, to speak, and to act without externally imposed restrains. As a matter of fact, finding freedom in order to live free is the common idea in Plato with "The Allegory of the Cave"; Henry David Thoreau with " Where I lived and What I lived for"; and Jean Paul Sartre with " Existentialism". Generally, Plato, Thoreau, and Sartre suggested that human life should be free. They differ in what that freedom is. Plato thinks it is found in the world of intellect, Thoreau thinks freedom is found in nature, and Sartre thinks freedom is found in subjectivity of individual.
What is truly real, and what is not? This question is one which has been pondered deeply throughout human history, and it seemingly has no definitive answer. To understand what is truly a part of reality, and what isn’t, may be an impossible feat. However, two famous works created by humans from two distant time periods attempt to dissect and analyze this philosophical question. The first, The Allegory of the Cave, was written by the great Greek philosopher, Plato, who was born in 428 B.C. in Athens, Greece. The Allegory of the Cave is a piece of a larger work of Plato’s, The Republic, which is a collection of works concerning political philosophy. The Republic is his most famous work and what he is best known for in today’s world. The second
In the essay “The Allegory of the Cave,” Plato addresses how humans generally do not pursue knowledge. Most humans are satisfied with what they already know and do not want to expand their knowledge. Plato uses simple examples to help the reader understand his logic on why humans do not expand their knowledge.
Do we really understand the world we live in and see everyday? Is our everyday perception of reality a misinterpretation, which somehow we can’t break free from? A famous Greek philosopher by the name of Plato sought out to explain this in an experiment he called the Cave Allegory. I will discuss what the Cave Allegory is as well as talk about the movie Interstellar, which is a great example of Plato’s Cave Allegory and how it relates to Plato’s ideas. The question we have to answer first is, what is Plato’s Cave Allegory?
This essay will primarily focus on the puzzle of false belief, break it down to what the puzzles are and if false belief is possible or impossible. Theaetetus establishes the puzzle of false belief that false belief cannot include misidentifying anything that's unknown, because the unknown does not even occur in the believer's thoughts; however, it cannot include misidentifying anything that is known, based on the reason that the believer cannot be wrong about what he knows (Theaetetus 188a-c). The puzzle of false belief shows that if humans be firm on conceiving the association between thought and its objects on the model of holding or grasping something in our hands, humans can not make up for the possibility of false identity judgement,
In the Allegory of the Cave Socrates describes to Glaucon a situation in which there are a number of prisoners are shackled by their arms and legs to the wall inside of a cave. The prisoners are unable turn their heads and as a result they are only able to see what is directly in front of them. The prisoners of the cave are able to hear noises, and see shadows, which were casted upon the wall in front of them by a fire burning behind them in the cave. The prisoners were restricted to only these observations.
In The Republic, Plato presents a dialogue of Socrates, in which he seeks to uncover truths about what constitutes a just society, and what kind of men would rule such a society. Socrates presents an allegory about the feeing effect of education, and how the lack of knowledge affects our nature- the allegory of the caves. While the allegory of the caves presents a basic picture of the prison of man’s ignorance, and his journey out of ignorance, the rich symbolism of the allegory appears in modern works, and can be a useful frame for viewing faith. The symbolism in the allegory of the cave is critical because every element is symbolic of something greater. The first and foremost object in the allegory is the cave itself “an underground
It is pretty difficult not knowing the full truth with our surroundings don’t you think? Francis Bacon thought so. That is why he wrote “The Four Idols” explaining intellectual fallacies under four parts he calls idols. These idols are known as idols of the Tribe, idols of the Cave, idols of the Marketplace and idols of the Theater. Idols of the Tribe are what he calls “false mirror”, which stands for our natural impressions, which distorts the true meaning of things.