Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Deeper meaning of madness is divine sense
Definition of insanity essay
Definition of insanity essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Deeper meaning of madness is divine sense
Madness is defined as a state of severe mental illness. It is seen as how you think and/or act with another person or thing. In Plato’s Phaedrus, Socrates, while saying his Great Speech, lists two types of madness and four types of “divine madness.” In this speech, he establishes many different thoughts and beliefs. One of the most important statements Socrates claimed is that madness is shown to be of utmost importance in life. We have all experienced different types of madness in our lives. Of course no human being is the same so the affects and reactions vary. I believe that if we do not have madness in our lives then our lives would be boring. There would be no passion and no excitement. It is sometimes nice to have something different …show more content…
occur in our lives, something out of the ordinary. Just as us humans experience madness, so do animals. Although there may be a separation between humans and animals, madness is one of the few things that we both share, and in light of that we are bound in some kind of way. While animals can experience madness, they cannot experience divine madness. In Socrates’ Great Speech, he talks about how it is important to have eros in your life, which is also known as love.
Socrates says that madness that comes from love is the best kind of madness. While speaking to Phaedrus he states that there are two types of madness and four types of divine madness. He tells Phaedrus that the two kinds of madness are “produced by human illness, and the other by a divinely inspired release from normally accepted behavior” (Plato, 265a). What he means by this is that our madness can stem from us being sick, mentally and/or physically. We can also become mad by just being ourselves. The four kinds of divine madness come from “the inspiration of the prophet to Apollo, of the mystic to Dionysus, of the poet to the Muses, and the fourth part of madness to Aphrodite and to Love” (Plato, 265b). Socrates states that the first type of divine madness guides cities and individuals. The second type of divine madness is the one that consoles or relieves you from any type of hardship or stress. He states that this can happen in the form of prayers, purification, mystic rites, and in the form of prophecies. The divine madness coming from the Muses awakens the soul to a “Bacchic frenzy of songs and poetry” (Plato, 245a). This implies that this type of divine madness enters into our virgin and innocent souls and stirs it up so much that chaos occurs. Lastly, divine madness coming from Aphrodite and Eros is love. Yet, even after Socrates described all of …show more content…
the different types of madness, not everything can be regarded as divine madness. For something to be considered as divine madness it has to philosophical. Human madness can be pathological. Therefore madness is not always divine. For example, if someone is experiencing a type of mental illness it is considered as a sort of madness but not divine because it is not philosophical. The mental illness is considered pathological. In Phaedrus, madness does not denote an evil demeanor; instead it signifies a philosophical inspiration. Madness is something that is in our system, in our bodies; it is a natural reaction we get when we experience something that is unplanned or unusual.
Animals also can experience madness. They can experience just as much as human beings do, but they do not experience divine madness because they are not philosophical. Animals can understand themselves think. For example a dog knows when you are arriving, but these thoughts are not considered self-conscious thoughts. Animals go mad when a tragedy occurs or when they are put in different settings and environments. Although animals and humans are different when it comes to what type of madness we experience we both share the madness that love brings us. Throughout Socrates’ Great Speech, he emphasized that love, or eros, was the best kind of madness. He also claimed that wisdom comes from love. He declares that if we seek wisdom we will receive love. He continues to state that when we encounter eros, it is so powerful that we can feel love and are reminded that we were souls, and that we have wings. As mammals, we have all encountered some type of love, whether it comes from your family or friends or pets, we have all experienced it. Animals go mad when a loved one gets hurt or when they are run out of their homes due to natural causes or human activities. Due to animals’ maternal and paternal instincts they automatically take care of their young just as we humans do. Animals have the ability to go mad because they can feel
certain emotions. They are living beings and they are aware of things that occur around them. The reactions they have would not happen if they did not feel any emotions. Since animals do not think self-consciously they cannot experience divine madness, therefore this reinforces the separation between human and non-human animals. Socrates establishes a new idea of how our soul works. He compares our soul to a chariot with two horses and a charioteer. He states “the gods have horses and charioteers that are themselves all good and come from good stock besides, while everyone else has a mixture” (Plato, 246b). This signifies that gods automatically have good souls while human beings have a choice to have a good or bad soul. Humans have a decision to lead a good or bad life. Socrates explains the good and bad horse by saying “one who is obedient to the charioteer is still controlled…. The other one, however, no longer responds to the whip or the goad of the charioteer; it…does everything to aggravate its yokemate and its charioteer” (Plato, 254a). In order for humans to have a good soul they have to be able to control their actions and let the good horse take the lead. If humans let temptation in, their souls would take longer to get to heaven than the other good souls. Socrates declares that a human who controls their soul will be granted an early return to heaven after three thousand years instead on ten thousand years. Animals are not self-conscious thinkers so they do not have a good or bad horse. Therefore this proves the separation between human and non-human animals. In Plato’s Phaedrus, Socrates explained how there are two types of madness and four types of divine madness. In doing that Socrates made it clear that in order to provide and nourish our soul with great benefits we must have madness in our lives. We must welcome it and we must be able to control it. The main idea of his Great Speech is that madness cannot be considered a bad thing if it comes out of love. Madness is not an evil especially if it comes from the gods and is also the correct and true characterization of the love when the lover is a philosopher. Socrates truly believed that wisdom came from love and because of that humans are able to experience madness and divine madness more frequently than animals.
Madness, madness, madness. It is but a word, yet those who possess it are capable of doing the most amazing or terrible of things. According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, madness is defined as “a state of severe mental illness.” Perry Edward Smith is the best individual to depict this characteristic. Throughout Truman Capote's novel “In Cold Blood” the main character, Perry Smith, as Dr. Jones says “. shows definite signs of severe mental illness” (Capote 296).
The sickness of insanity stems from external forces and stimuli, ever-present in our world, weighing heavily on the psychological, neurological, and cognitive parts of our mind. It can drive one to madness through its relentless, biased, and poisoned view of the world, creating a dichotomy between what is real and imagined. It is a defense mechanism that allows one to suffer the harms of injustice, prejudice, and discrimination, all at the expense of one’s physical and mental faculties.
What is madness? Is madness a brain disorder or a chemical imbalance? On the other hand, is it an expressed behavior that is far different from what society would believe is "normal"? Lawrence Durrell addresses these questions when he explores society's response to madness in his short story pair "Zero and Asylum in the Snow," which resembles the nearly incoherent ramblings of a madman. In these stories, Durrell portrays how sane, or lucid, people cannot grasp and understand the concept of madness. This inability to understand madness leads society to fear behavior that is different from "normal," and subsequently, this fear dictates how they deal with it. These responses include putting a name to what they fear and locking it up in an effort to control it. Underlying all, however, Durrell repeatedly raises the question: who should define what is mad?
Intelligence is often mistaken for brilliance, and conversely genius is mistaken for madness. Some of the greatest minds have been misconstrued in there time, and it is not until their whole life is taken into observance from the outside looking in, that their genius is realized and appreciated. Websters dictionary defines madness as "the act of being foolish or illogical." Ironically this form of thought has prompted some of the greatest advancements in government, science, and technology. It was the thought that every common man and woman should be included in his or her respective governments that prompted Democracy, a form of government unheard of before the signing of the Magna Carta. It was scientists and inventors thinking outside of the lines that inspired the cure for Small Pox and the invention of the computer. It can clearly be seen that serious thought is often the by-product of irrational thinking, this is also true for literature. It is while in madness, both feigned as well as sincere, that the characters in William Shakespeare's Hamlet are able to practice true mental clarity and express themselves in a manner free of treachery and falsehood.
Insanity, then, is inordinate or irregular, or impaired action of the mind, of the instincts, sentiments, intellectual, or perceptive powers, depending upon and produced by an organic change in the brain.
The quickest take over of madness is exhibited in Hamlet’s love interest, Ophelia. The most important example of madness is shown in Hamlet after his meeting with the Ghost and his plot for revenge upon his uncle. The most unexpected example of madness is in Laertes who in a fit of rage loses all gentleman like qualities and almost upsets the kingdom. All of these characters add up to the idea that to lose someone a person cares about dearly, ultimately ends in losing one’s composure and going mad. If we take away anything from Shakespeare’s play, it should be that each of us should think over our decisions prior to making them to insure we don’t have the same fate as the characters stated
Madness is a fundamental part of Greek tragedy that creates and intense, disturbing drama. In the case of Heracles, he is brought down at the height of his glory. He is a man that achieves his success through his own abilities. He is a hero that is strong, willful and lusts for experience. Even in his early childhood, he expressed traits of great hero where he destroys a snake in his childhood, he is very athletic, he hunts a lion at the age of eighteen, Furthermore, his labors represent brute strength where he deals with lions, carnivorous horses, and raging bulls. Also, Heracles has a twin brother, Iphicles, who is very much opposite to him. Iphicles, is set out to become a king and live in a dignified manner, while Heracles is made into a slave. This shows that Heracles had a troubles childhood where he wasn't treated to a normal, conditional family. however, Heracles is also pig-headed and directly challenged the gods sometime. Even though he has super-human strength, he is no match for the divine. Heracles brings much misery to the life around him, wh...
Love is intertwined with the dynamics of the soul, as love, according to Socrates, reminds the soul of what “true beauty,” or recollections of memories of the divine realm, is. In its quest to return to the divine realm, the soul subconsciously seeks out what it deems as beautiful. To elucidate the relationship between love and madness, Socrates emphasizes how justice, self-control, and knowledge, derivatives of divine madness, nourish the soul as it transgresses through the heavens. In his speech, Socrates mentions how only souls with a motivation or desire for beauty can move and, thus, be considered as living. To describe how the divine madness of love influences the cyclic transcending or rebirth of the soul, Socrates characterizes how soul can be interpreted as “the combined of a winged team of [two] horses and their charioteer” (246a). The charioteer, whom is the guider for the horse, represents humanity, while the white horse represents self-control and rationality, and the black horse, in juxtaposition, represents animalistic irrationalities, such as lust and greed. In order for a soul to seek beauty, the charioteer must have self-control and wisdom in order to prevent animalistic desire from taking control, and corrupting the soul’s wings. As a result, the fourth type of madness, according to
When you are insane, you are busy being insane - all the time... When I was crazy, that's all I was. - Sylvia Plath
Madness feeds on people’s greed, taking hostage of their desires and controlling them. It drives people into doing things they otherwise wouldn’t have even thought about doing when they were sane. In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Hamlet had overwhelming depression over the death of his father and his mother’s overly excitable attitude combined with the soon known knowledge of his father’s killer; he is fueled with hatred for both his mother and his uncle. Hamlet’s madness is indeed justified by the morbid disasters that are going on around him in the play.
In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, one of the most evident and important themes is the theme of madness. The theme is apparent throughout the play, mainly through the actions and thoughts of Hamlet, Ophelia, and Laertes. Madness is defined as the quality or condition of mental illness or derangement (being insane). Madness is at the center of the conflicts and problems of the play and is conveyed through Shakespeare’s elaborate use of manipulation and parallels between Hamlet, Ophelia, and Laertes to contribute to Hamlet’s tragic character. All examples of madness begin and end with death.
"Much Madness Is Divinest Sense." Poetry for Students. Ed. David M. Galens. Vol. 16. Detroit: Gale, 2002. 84-100. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.
Madness is a state-of-mind were a person loses their sanity, they are mentally ill. In the play Hamlet, Hamlet meets his deceased father in a ghost form only to inform him of who caused his death and wants revenge. Now Hamlet must avenge his father's death, and the only way he can do it in a less obvious approach is by acting mad. But as the play continues, it becomes a lot harder to tell if Hamlet is still sane due to his actions. In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare makes Hamlet's madness appear real but only to prove that he was only acting as if he were mad.
Plato widely a respected philosopher and is arguably one of the greatest philosophers of all time. I knew nothing about him or what he stood for before taking this course and I found his theory on human nature very exciting. “Plato’s most fundamental contribution to philosophy was the distinction he drew between the changing physical objects we perceive with our senses and the under changing ideals we can know with our minds.” What Plato means is when we see something that we think is good or bad that there is good strong reasoning behind why we think the way we do. I find this very intriguing because, this it pertains to how I feel about everyday things and big Icons. For example, when hanging out at a friend’s house that is considerably richer
In my opinion, Socrates’ analysis of human nature is very true as it ultimately brings us