Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criticism of plato theory of education
Criticism of plato theory of education
How literature is important in children's learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criticism of plato theory of education
Ancient Philosophy Essay 1A
Plato argues that certain poets should be censored primarily through education. He states that legends and fables, while useful for their historical presence, should not be told to younger children. Socrates argues “Shall we carelessly allow our children to hear any old stories made up by just anyone, then, and to take beliefs into their souls that are, for the most part, the opposite of the ones we think they should hold when they are grown up" (377b). He believes these stories initiate the behaviors that are unjust and oppose how society expects them to conform. "Just as a painter might paint a picture that is not at all like the things he is trying to paint," (337e) children should only be taught the truth otherwise they get a false sense of reality. Plato is particularly
…show more content…
targeting Homer's The Odyssey with this idea of censorship and strongly feels that it should be removed due to the inaccuracies told about the gods and what the gods bring to human beings.
Plato deduces that Gods are good, they are not what many have claimed to be the cause of everything. They are, in turn, only the cause of a few things in a human being's life, such as the good. A good portrait of the gods and heroes will show them as worthy and exalted beings but poets such as Homer and Hesiod often spread tales of the gods and heroes fighting, bickering and acting immorally (390b-391e). With the censoring of the Odyssey, they are taking out what is thought to muddle the youths mind with deceptions and fallacies and instead putting in only truths to clarify the sense of justness. This idea of restricting poets, writings, or stories still applies to the modern day in terms of schools contemplating the mandatory reading of some books such as How to Kill a Mockingbird, Huckleberry Finn, and I know why the Caged Bird Sang due to the disturbing content and choice of language used within in the pages. Just as Plato was concerned with the corruption of youth’s minds with falsehoods about gods, parents are concerned of racism having the same effect today. Racism is the strong contender for the reasoning behind pulling these
books out of current curriculum. Parents do not want their children to be exposed to the violence, language, and attitudes that correlate to racism because their minds are still impressionable and with the readings of such books their idea of the world would change to a fictitious reality. Plato acknowledged these ideas and felt that even as the children aged and matured that the readings should still be regulated to ensure that behaviors previously instilled are ingrained in their mind as a permanent fixture. To have a good city, you must have good citizens and to have good citizens you must start young to mold and educate them with teachings that will directly correspond to the actions they should adhere to, thus shielding them from bad material.
In review of both Plato and Mill’s arguments for and against censorship, I come to my conclusion that holds true to Mill. I could not have said it any better than Mill’s two main arguments against censorship. Humans make mistakes and making mistakes is entirely unavoidable because we are not perfect. Therefore, without being perfect, how can a human, like Plato, decide the perfect way to form a society? Plato makes sense in that he does not care about happiness he only cares about an ideal state with little or no issues. I understand that was his goal in forming the Republic but as I see it Plato leaves no room for growth. In his society, everything will be the same for generations and generations. His society is very well structured and extremely thought out but it essentially must be in order to thrive for many years because the workers only work, the guardians only guard, and the rulers only rule. Only what the rulers do, say, or think is important and they too are just as human as those they lead. My question to Plato is simply why? Why are the rulers, the philosophers, the ones ...
These school boards and parents can claim that banning this classic will protect their children from these subjects and these thoughts, and that by doing so, they can create the world to be a perfect place with love and harmony. The religious can claim all the righteousness they want, that God made the civilized man and that without religion, we wouldn’t be where we are today. However, the true nature of these subjects isn’t in that they exist, but the fact that we simply just don’t want to think or admit that they exist within ourselves. We need to use this book as a textbook to life, or a sort of guiding hand that tells us we need to realize that without our civilizations and without our rules, the world would be a much ruthless place than it is today.
In Plato’s Apology, when Socrates is pleading his defence, he makes a good argument against the charges of corrupting the youth of Athens. This is evident when he states that, firstly, Meletus, the man who is trying to get Socrates executed, has never cared about the youth of Athens and has no real knowledge on the subject. Secondly, Socrates states that if he was in some way corrupting the youth, then he was doing it unintentionally or unwillingly, in which case he was brought to court for no reason. Finally, Socrates brings to light the fact that Meletus doesn’t have a single witness to attest to Socrates’ corruption. This is how Socrates proves his argument that he isn’t responsible for corrupting the youth of Athens.
Something else that must be mentioned in order to understand the evils of school censorship are facts censors ignore; the first being literary quality. When they chose to censor a book they do not take into account the educational value of the book. How can one say a book does not belong in schools if they do not know what lessons it teaches? The second key element ignored is the manner in which teachers lead students to interact with texts. They g...
In Plato's perfect society, regulating the stories, songs, poems, and actions told to children is meant to enforce the standard of how people should act, think, and believe. Plato states that his "first business is to supervise the production of stories, and choose only those we think suitable, and reject the rest." (Pg.72) This theory seems to have certain advantag...
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
Books on school’s curriculum required to read over the school year is excessively challenged by students and parents who believe that they are offensive. A certain book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, was challenged by a father who believed that the book not only swore and used cigarettes, but also went against their religious belief. Alton Verm, the challenger to Bradbury’s work, commented,“it’s just all kinds of filth,” and wanted the book withdrawn from the curriculum. Granted that Fahrenheit 451 is inappropriate at times, the book’s theme is something that everyone should examine. Moreover, books prevent old mistakes from happening and gives people independent thought and opinion.
For others, the ability to teach children things without them feeling like they are being tutored is very well liked and useful. Some people remember growing up on fables told by their parents and have fond memories of them. Fables have defined the traits of many animals and continue to do so. Fables have endured throughout the years, and will most likely continue to do so. Works Cited “Aesop.”
Education was always thought to be a vital tool to all people, but in today’s world many consider it a way for the evils of the world to tant the young. This of course is known as the “Banned Books” debate. One side that believes books should be limited to prevent the children to be exposed to information that they believe to be inappropriate. And the other that believes in the total opposite and continues to point out the importance of the primary focus of literature, in which is education. Overall what makes this debate so difficult is the fact of what makes literature so valuable to the future generations, in being: at the end of the day education is a natural right given to every American citizen, they provide valuable lessons, and of course
Plato describes in his Parable of the Cave the importance of education and how it changes the way people see things. In Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, Oedipus makes rash and hasty decisions that at times are good, but more often than not, they get him into trouble. And finally, in Dante’s Inferno, Dante uses Virgil as a guide to show him the path through hell. In Parable of the Cave, Oedipus the King, and Inferno, the author’s text can be related to my own life in school, work, and how I was raised.
The Scarlet Letter, The Diary of Anne Frank, and To Kill a Mockingbird all have something in common; these books, although great literary classics, have been banned in schools throughout various points in history. These and other classics are vital for young adolescents to be exposed to since they instill important values and introduce wholly different eras with dated and unconventional ideas. Unfortunately, the government has decided that such improper books should be forbidden from schools due to parental concern for their children’s school reading. Even though this government interference protects what students read, such as the unconcealed use of profanity, racial slurs, and sexual references, books should not be banned in schools because this act goes against the First Amendment and hinders students’ ability to learn and develop as human beings.
One can read books to gain knowledge and increase their level of reading but not to come across offensive language and words. Especially in school, children are censored from these books that are controversial in the classroom. Parents are the ones who have a hard time letting their children read these books because they use curse words or have morals that differ from personal values. As a parent it is their right to fight the banning of books that use language such as the “n-word” or characters depicted negatively. Presently in the classroom, “race matters in these books. It’s a matter of how you express that in the 21st century” (Schultz). When children read these novels they may think that it is acceptable for them to a...
“Gods can be evil sometimes.” In the play “Oedipus the King”, Sophocles defamed the gods’ reputation, and lowered their status by making them look harmful and evil. It is known that all gods should be perfect and infallible, and should represent justice and equity, but with Oedipus, the gods decided to destroy him and his family for no reason. It might be hard to believe that gods can have humanistic traits, but in fact they do. The gods, especially Apollo, are considered evil by the reader because they destroyed an innocent man’s life and his family. They destroyed Oedipus by controlling his fate, granting people the power of prophecy, telling Oedipus about his fate through the oracle of Apollo, and finally afflicting the people of Thebes with a dreadful plague. Fundamentally, by utilizing fate, prophecies, the oracle of Apollo, and the plague, the gods played a significant role in the destruction of Oedipus and his family.
The literary works of Plato were highly inspired from Socrates' teachings. He presented the ideas through poems, drama, rhetoric and upbringing the various social issues to be addressed in the society. The dialogues of Plato are the most famous for their bold remarks, conversational interactions and as a great source of understanding the intricate delicacies of complex situations. Plato's early works of dialogues addressed investigations of a single issue and one criticism in this respect is that these early works lacked concluding remarks. Euthyphro has also raised significant doubts regarding defining the morally right action in light of the d...
Plato discusses The Republic as a blueprint for a utopian society built uon the innate goodness of man. Therefore, he sets strict guidelines for which this society must run, cultivating children’s education as the primary stepping stone which filters pout the unnecessary and priming them with the necessities to become a rational; citizen. One major stance, Plato repeatedly mentions, is the unnecessary idea of poetry being exposed to children in the first place even before being inculcated in a child’s curriculum. I believe Plato is correct in assuming that poetry is an influence only for ill, through his reasoning, Plato details the efforts of this art form and the repercussions that extend from it within The Republic. He bases poetry as an ill because it is not a form with real value, but an improper one at the bottom of the hierarchal of forms that promotes ill. Next, Plato theorizes that poetry is an imitation of the truth, and is immoral. Lastly, poetry has a detrimental effect to the soul, in a society where the purpose is to purify it, so that it may serve the state.