Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies jack character analysis essay
Lord of the flies jack character analysis essay
Character analysis for jack in lord of flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies jack character analysis essay
ck brings survival instincts, selflessness and the lust for power over an individual's psyche, highlighted by the id. Jack is compelled to fulfill his mortal, basic physiological needs for needs and desires. Throughout the novel, Jack emanates an aura of self-centeredness, and Ralph sees this in the novel. For example, Ralph is enraged at Jack for leaving the fire unattended to go hunting, and Ralph bluntly tells Jack, “you could have had everyone when the shelters were finished. But you had to hunt” (Golding 75). Jack does not consider the repercussions of leaving the fire unattended. While his hunting for wild pig is not necessary for survival; he hunts because it pleases him, To the id, all that matters is the fulfillment to “satisfy basic …show more content…
Piggy is aware of his Achilles heel which is his physical inferiority to the rest of the boys and prefers to make up for it in interesting ways. In the case of Ralph inviting him to swim in the beach pool, he patiently replies, “you can‟t half swim well.” (8) Parallel to the id, Piggy acknowledges his physical inferiority from nearsightedness, and asthma-The ego identifies the id's sensibility to temptation. Also, he does not endeavor a persona in which he is not by living true to his intellectual identity the ego limits them from committing sins that are out of an individual's natural character. He is also the one which distinguishes the id's savagery and the superego's chastity to come up with a practical situation for the boy's predicament. When the limited surviving members of Ralph group vainly consult with Jack at Castle Rock, Piggy, over the cries of Jack's hunters, cries, “which is better to have rules and agree, or to hunt and kill?” (200). With Simon gone, Piggy realizes that law and order must be maintained to guarantee everyone's survival until they are saved, and he attempts to emphasize this to Jack's tribe. The group has far too much ordinary civilization, and as a result, abuses it to justify their savage behaviors. "The ego and its eternal faith in logic lie above the id to meet personal wants and social norms …show more content…
Simon's pureness of his heart opens him up to doing favors for nothing in return. The littluns “lugged him towards the trees” for him to pick off “the fruit they could not reach”; and until “he had satisfied them” did he stop and be on his way (57). The littluns lack the skills and strength to obtain what they desire. Simon fulfills it by doing their work, but he goes the extra mile and does the "right‟ thing by attending to each boy's wants rather than only putting minimal effort in, leaving the children malcontent. Also, Simon has an inequality and mind of an adult's. He is the first and only person to suggest that the boys are the beast, regardless of his anxiety to do so: “Maybe, maybe there is a beast…What I mean is…maybe it‟s only us” (95-96). Innate evil lies within human existence, and we are born with it; however, it is also human nature that puts the fault in an external force rather than in an individual self. Lastly, Simon makes the ultimate sacrifice– his life– in his desperate last shot at shedding light on the truth of the actual identity of the beast itself. After his ordeal with the Lord of the Flies, Simon rushes back to the boys to share his discovery, “crying about a dead man ” (168), only for the savagery of the boys to rise to the surface. Simon genuinely takes honesty to heart, and, though
While they agree that the beast is not a traditional monster, it is Simon’s philosophical understanding that allows him to fully realize the meaning of the beast. At the assembly, Ralph plans to discuss the beast, hoping to bring the fear to an end. Simon suggests that the boys themselves are the beast. Later, when Simon encounters the “Lord of the Flies” in a hallucination, the reader learns the extent of his understanding. The Lord of the Flies mocks Simon by saying, “Fancy you thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill...You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?”(128). Simon realizes that there is something within humans that can cause them to act savagely. However, at the assembly, in an effort to understand what Simon meant about the beast, the boys suggest that the beast could be a ghost. Piggy firmly rejects this idea because he approaches the beast in the same way he handles most situations: logically and scientifically. As Piggy states, “Life… is scientific, that’s what it is…. I know there isn’t no beast- not with claws and all that, I mean- but I know there isn’t no fear either… unless we get afraid of people” (72). Piggy understands fear can have detrimental effects, but he does not yet understand that fear is within every person, and this is the “beast” that can cause people to act without
The division begins to appear soon after Jack kills the pig. Ralph hesitates to blow the conch because, “if [he] blows the conch and [the littluns] do not come back; then we’ve had it”(92). Ralph understands Jack’s hunting is a threat to his power. Jack and Ralph cannot coexist and if the order ends, chaos will ensue and it will be because Jack and Ralph divided. The littluns not coming to the sounds of the conch would show they have chosen Jack, effectively pushing Ralph out of power, and he would soon be targeted, and cause him to resent Jack.The tension comes to a crest in a confrontation between Jack and Ralph after Jack’s tribe stole piggy’s glasses. Both Ralph and Piggy questioned, “which is better- to have rules and agree, or to hunt and kill”(180)? The first half represents what Ralph stands for, while the second half is what Jacks stands for, showing a stark clash of their identities. A majority of the boys chose the second option immediately, and the rest were killed or forced to the majority. This was the beginning of the end of the illusion of society. It leads to more violence and a separation between everyone and Ralph. Being chained to their identities creates an exaggerated and obvious we-they
Ralph is one of the few boys who realize that the only way to survive is through peace and order. Because he summons the boys at the beginning of the novel with the conch he and Piggy find, they look upon him as the most responsible of the boys and elect him as a chief over the humiliated Jack. Ralph creates a stable and peaceful society for the children to live; this significantly bothers Jack because he wants to have fun and do things that he never did back in the civilized society. Jack is eventually successful of pulling nearly all of the children out of Ralph’s control to form savages. Ralph represents the civilization, and Jack represents the primitive society.
After his meeting with the Lord of the Flies, Simon travels to tell the boys and is murdered. From this point on Evil and Savagery are released and run rampant and the majority of the boys on the island. This just confirms the fact that Simon was right, the beast lives in all of
In the end, even though he failed to inform the other boys of it, Simon through his use of spiritual power was able to recognize the truth. He stood strong against evil even though it consumed the island after his death. People can look to him as an example of how to act in real life. And to be honest, Simon is an important character to Lord of the Flies by William Golding, not just for all this, but because he is what every person should wish to be. In the book the others bully him because they do not quite understand him, but Simon in all reality is a role model for the world. Don’t you think that the world would be a much better place, if we all tried to act a little bit like Simon?
The reason the Lord of the Flies threatens Simon is because Simon knows that the beast is not a tangible creature that lives in the forest which is dangerous information. In reality, the beast is simply the innate evil that resides in every man. Simon knows this because he realizes that all the information the boys know about the beast does not add up and that such a creature cannot exist so it must be something impalpable but powerful, something that is making them so afraid that it is changing them from the inside out. He questions this “beast with claws that scratched, that sat on a mountaintop, that left no tracks and yet was not fast enough to catch Samneric” and grasps the concept that the more they fear the beast, the more they change (112).
On contrary from all the other boys on the island Simon, a Christ like figure in the novel, did not fear the ‘beastie’ or the unknown. “Maybe there is a beast....maybe it's only us” Simon explained. (p. 97) The fear of the unknown in the novel contributes to the boys’ terror of the beast, the beast is an imaginary figure which lays in all of the boys’ minds and haunts them. Golding uses the beast as a symbol of the evil that exists in every creature. "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are the way they are?" The sow head announced to Simon to be the “lord of the flies”. The “lord of the flies” is a figure of the devil, and brings out all the evil and fear in people. It wants you to fear it, but if you don’t believe in the “lord of the flies” nothing can happen to you. Therefore Simon didn’t fall into the trap, but the beast killed him, meaning the other boys on the island did. Simon discovered that the beast is in fact just a dead parachute man before he died and ran down to tell the boys about his finding. When Sim...
In Beast From Air, the boys have the false idea of the beast being the dead parachutist that falls on the island: the fear the boys have of the beast leads to the death of Simon in chapter 9, A View to a Death. A factual interpretation of the beast would be that it represents danger and a direct threat to the boys; it can be a symbol of chaos and death within the island. An extended interpretation of the beast is that it represents the innate evil in humans, the primal, bestial feelings within us all: one of the novel’s main themes. Although the beast is metaphorical, the boys' behavior is what brings the beast into existence, so the more savagely the boys act, the more real the beast seems to become. This is realized by Simon and is proposed in Beast From Water after a littlun suggests the possibility of the beast on the island: “What I mean is . . . maybe it’s only us”. Simon explains that perhaps the beast is only the boys themselves. The boys ignore Simon’s realization, yet Simon’s words are central to Golding’s point that inborn human evil exists. Simon is the first character in the novel to see the beast not as an outer force, but as a constituent element of human nature.
In spite of this, this novel proves that civilization has the power to keep one’s innate cruelty under control. The instance of a society running rampant with evil is seen when the group of boys abandon the civilized behaviors of the adult world, and predominately begin to take in Jack’s vicious influence on them. Thus, as the boys began to act more barbaric and savage, they do not feel the need to listen to Ralph's wisdom and guidance anymore. If they had listened to him, Piggy and Simon, in all likelihood, would not have had to die, and many wise plans would have been followed. Overall, the author reveals that due to the savage and violent nature of humans, qualities of physical power are more prominent than the often under looked qualities of civility and common intelligence in
The boys find their id being challenged by their ego. Ego is described as the “part of the id which has been modified by the direct influence of the external world,” meaning it is the part of the psyche which suppresses basic impulses according to the norms or “rules” of a person’s situation (Freud 1923). In the initial days on the island, the boys actions are greatly affected by the rules of their previous society or their “ego.” When Roger was throwing rocks at the young boys, there was still “a space round Henry...into which [Roger] dare not throw.” Here, Roger is still affected by “the taboo of the old life” and still concerned with social norms as he hasn’t been on the island long enough to revert to his inner primitive nature (Golding 83). The boys are also being held back by something else- their desire for order and leadership. When Ralph and Piggy happen upon the conch, it isn’t ever seen as just a shell. They almost immediately see the conch as a way to gather the boys and a way to provide structured speaking. Ralph’s first thought is that they “ought to have a chief to decide things," because it’s what he and the other boys are used to (Golding 27). The positive reaction to the idea of having a chief shows their trust in leadership and societal structure. Once Ralph’s leadership is challenged, and the structure is lost, the barbaric behavior begins, and the boys become more susceptible to groupthink and
All of the boys but Simon are becoming the beast at that moment. In Lord of the Flies, Golding proves that fear draws out man’s inner evil and barbarism. Within the novel, Golding uses characterization of the boys and symbolism of the beast to show the gradual change from their initial civility to savagery and inhumanity. Learned civility, order and humanity become ultimately futile in the face of fear. The author teaches that without logic, fear consumes us endlessly.
Many refer to it as the Lord of the Flies, Simon, though, offers a different approach to the matter. Regarding the beast, Simon’s “inward sight the picture of a” man “once heroic and sick”. This gives proof to Simon wisdom, making him stands on a superior level in terms of intelligence and philosophy from the other boys. Simon recognizes the beast’s true identity when he attempts to explain to the boys that there is no real beast, it’s only the fear of themselves. "What I mean is . . . maybe it's only us.” (Golding 89) However, his “effort fell about him in ruins;” as “the laughter beat him cruelly and he shrank away defenseless to his seat.” (Golding 89) The response Simon receives show that the audience is not ready to accept the meaningful truth, that the fear of themselves causes a deception among the boys to create an illusion of a fleshly beast. Simon is willing to persist on a quest of unraveling the false beast, because he wants the boys to face their fear, the beast within themselves. Along the way, he comes face to face with the Lord of the Flies, literally described as a severed pig’s head impaled upon a stake, “a gift for the beast” (Golding 137). The encounter consolidates the idea that the real beast is more about the concept of evil, which is what the figure represents, than a physical creature that can do harm to the community. Fearing that
Simon would tell the boys that the beast was within and like Jesus, many would not listen until too late. Simon and Jesus Christ died in the same manner. Both died trying to tell others what was best for them. Simon tried to tell the kids that the beast was within themselves even when he was dying but none listened. 2 Simon’s conversation with Lord of the Flies is the turning point of the book.
Jack’s intense desire to kill a pig clearly reflects this side of the id. Despite the fact that the fire on the mountain is paramount to their rescue, Jack forsakes his duty and instead follows his yearning for the pig and its meat, claiming that he needed the fire watchers “...in the hunt,”(70). Instead of feeling remorse for letting the fire go out, Jack gets, “...vaguely irritated by [its] irrelevance…” (69). Jack’s whims steadily become more chaotic as his rationale goes out the window, challenging Ralph’s authority and sowing disarray among the boys. His responses to Ralph’s authority become more covered in “rising antagonism,” and “brooding” which only spurs further discourse in the group (118). Jack’s main focus is on the things he deems significant, so when something insignificant gets in the way, he becomes
Ralph also is a leader and realizes his duties as a leader and knows he has to take care of the boys on the island. After the conch broke and the deaths of piggy and Simon, Ralph wondered “What was the sensible thing to do? There was no Piggy to talk sense. There was no solemn assembly for debate nor dignity of the conch” (282). Ralph is still the Ego and he needs the superego to help him make rational mature decisions.