Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Environmental justice my reflection
Climate change impacts on the natural environment
Environmental argument essays on social injustice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Environmental justice my reflection
Today in the news we constantly hear about increasing global temperatures, horrific levels of pollution, and rapid destruction of natural habitats; we undoubtable live in a time of server ecological crisis. The social philosophy of environmental justice addresses and acts upon this unanswered injustice. There are three main concepts to do so. First, according to White, we need to reject Christianity’s and science’s justification for human’s hieratical domination over nature. Secondly, Robbins discusses how Capitalism’s model of consumption causes negative environmental consequences, as seen within the sugar-beef complex. Lastly, Loy provides a solution to this injustice by rejecting dualism and calling for unity and respect for mother Earth. …show more content…
The sugar-beef complex’s system of agriculture and processing are extremely harmful to the environment. In order to grow an process sugar, land must be cleared and wood or fossil fuels must be burned. This caused the destruction of Florida’s Everglades, a smog problem in Antwerp, and so progressive deforestation in the Canary Island that the government could not even regulate it (Robbin 188). Similarly, the beef’s system has negative consequences on the environment. Robbins stated that, “livestock production is one of the most environmentally damaging and wasteful forms of food production the world has known” (187). Livestock consumes 80% of grains produced in the U.S. and consumes half of U.S. water. It also requires huge amount of land to grow feed and for rangeland that causes deforestation, threatens local wildlife, and historically caused the extinction of buffalo (192-193, 197). Therefore, the sugar-beef complex is detrimental to the environment due to its high environmental cost of production to our limited fragile natural resources. Unfortunately, due to the increasing globalization of fast food and Capitalism’s demand for higher and higher consumption these industries are growing and causing exponentially more
The majority of this piece is dedicated to the author stating his opinion in regards to civilization expanding beyond its sustainable limits. The author makes it clear that he believes that humans have failed the natural environment and are in the process of eliminating all traces of wilderness from the planet. Nash points out facts that strengthen his argument, and quotes famous theologians on their similar views on environmental issues and policies. The combination of these facts and quotes validates the author’s opinion.
Society portrays the Earth as a resource, a place that provides an abundance of tools that are beneficial to one’s way of living. As time continues on, humanity’s definition of sustainability with the ecosystem becomes minor, meaning that it is not essential to their own lives. Thus, leading to the environment becoming polluted and affecting the human population. These ideas are demonstrated through these four sources: “Despair Not” by Sandra Steingraber, which provides the author’s perspective on the environmental crisis in terms of climate change.
In the journal of Environmentalism as Religion, Paul H. Rubin discuss about how environmental is similar to religion. Rubin want everyone to know that the environment and religion are somehow similar in a way, which they both have belief system, creation stories and original sin.
As time passes, our population continues to increase and multiply; yet, on the other hand, our planet’s resources continue to decrease and deplete. As our population flourishes, human beings also increase their demands and clamor for the Earth’s natural products, yet are unable to sacrifice their surplus of the said resources. Garret Hardin’s work highlighted the reality that humans fail to remember that the Earth is finite and its resources are limited. Hardin’s article revealed that people are unable to fathom that we indeed have a moral obligation to our community and our natural habitat — that we are not our planet’s conquerors but its protectors. We fail to acknowledge and accept that we only have one Earth and that we must protect and treasure it at all costs. Despite all our attempts at annihilating the planet, the Earth will still be unrelenting — it will still continue to be present and powerful. Human beings must recognize that we need this planet more than it needs us and if we persist on being egocentric and covetous, in the end it is us who will
In 1989, seventy five percent of Americans identified themselves as environmentalists, and the number has continued to grow since then (Walls 1). Environmentalism is now the most popular social movement in the United States, with over five million American families donating regularly to environmental organizations (Walls 1). Environmentalists today focus on what kind of world they hope to see in the future, and largely deal with limiting pollution and changing consumption rates (Kent 1 and 9). Modern environmentalists also have much different issues than those Carson’s America faced. With climate change becoming more threatening each year, protection of the natural world is needed more than ever. Pollution has caused the warmest decade in history, the deterioration of the ozone layer, and species extinction in extreme numbers (Hunter 2). It not only threatens nature, but also human populations, who already suffer from lack of clean water and poisoning from toxic chemicals (Hunter 16). Unlike environmental actions in the 1960’s, which were mostly focused on protection, a massive increase in pollution has caused efforts to be focused on environmental restoration (Hunter 16). Like in the time of Silent Spring, environmentalists are not only concerned with one country. Protecting the environment remains a global issue, and every nation is threatened by the
While humans are becoming increasingly aware of the environmental issues that are occurring in the world, most human systems are still unsustainable. Being sustainable in a society means that humans treat Earth like it has a limited supply of resources that need to be carefully managed in order to prevent damage to the world around us (Chiras, D. D., 2016). So, being unsustainable is the opposite; when humans treat the world like they are dominant over it, as well as believing that the Earth has an unlimited supply of resources that should be consumed by humans. Human beliefs and practices influence unsustainability, which can, and often do, correspond with the root cause of the problem.
An environmentalist is a person worships the environment and cares for nature more than people. Christians and others share the common perception that environmental ethics exist for how human beings should relate to the land, the free market perceptive and the environmental perceptive. Humans share a relationship with all creations of the earth. But as humans, they find themselves as having a role in the created order which is they have a closer relationship with the creator who has charged them with acting responsible within his creation. Even allowing a common complaint of environmental activists is that Stewardship means that the earth was made exclusively because of human beings - that having dominion upper nature is the same as having the power and directly of domination. Christians consequently share a close relationship by means of the whole of aspects of creation, since in relation to the environment, its unbroken humanity, not unbroken nature, that's seen to be the problem. Stewardship in simple terms means to manage someone else’s property. Christians proclaims that everything belong to God, so as Christians, we need to have the attitude that our belongings are his belongings. As stewards, we have the responsibility of being in charge of the earth. We have been placed in charge and are responsible for whatever happens to it, even though it does not belong to us, as we all know it belong to God. In Genesis 2:15, God took man and placed him in the Garden of Eden to work and take care of it.
Have you ever considered environmentalism as a huge guilt trip? Or on a more extreme spectrum, a possible replacement for religion? Majority of people utilize environmentalism as a means of trying to protect the earth, while subconsciously having motives and values instilled within themselves that they employ through their behaviors. This is depicted in the article “Green Guilt”, where the author Stephen Asma, makes readers question whether environmentalism is emerging as a new religion.
In “Green Guilt,” Stephen Asma argues that people who “feel passionate about saving the planet justify their intense feelings by pointing to the seriousness of the problem…,” but there are feelings of guilt and indignation that make people the necessity to “go green” (25). Asma substantiates his arguments on Friedrich Nietzsche who recognizes that religious emotions, “like guilt and indignation, are still with us, even we’re not religious.”(26). From this last point, Asma explains that environmentalism has emerged as a substitute for religion. Even though people do not believe in God, they need to believe in a “pristine environment”(27). At the end of his essay, Asma points out that people need to save the planet but in a reasonable way. In his overall essay, Asma describes with substantiate and convincing information how
Environmental Justice Communication: Conceptualizing the Environment from a Cultural Framework Most Americans conjure imagery of a planet replete with pristine wilderness, crystal blue oceans, fresh air, and verdant forests when they think about the natural environment. In recent decades, this description is becoming increasingly applicable only to certain areas of the United States because poor and minority communities are overwhelmingly subjected to dangerous environmental hazards. As such, the concept of environmental racism has become a major issue affecting every aspect of their lives because of their placement and proximity to environmentally dangerous areas such as landfills, toxic waste sites, and other forms of pollution. The environmental
And Mr. Crichton theorizes that there are two reasons why we need to go back to environmental science, and leave the religion aspect behind us. First, we need to stick with the cold hard facts of science and we can’t rely on one government political party to solve all of our problems for us, this is an all-for-one type of deal, with no connotations involved. Our second reason he explains is that religions think that they have the answers to everything. But when it comes to environmentalism, we are dealing with discoveries that are still being found to this day, we need to evolve and mesh ourselves in order to accept new ideas and proceed with how to live our lives
In environmental science, there are a set of terms that represent different ways one views his/her relationship with the environment. These terms, called value systems, describe a spectrum ranging from ecocentric, or highly valuing the environment, to technocentric, or valuing technological innovation over the natural environment. In the middle of the spectrum, is another perspective known as anthropocentrism, which describes one’s valuing of humans over the environment. As human civilization became the dominant species on earth, the environment became insignificant compared to the needs of civilization. The natural world became nothing more than a means to provide humans
One primary evidence of how religion plays a role over the issue of environmental sustainability is Association of Benedictine Colleges & Universities refers to The Ten Hallmarks of Benedictine Education, which lists ten standards, or hallmarks that Benedictine Educations wants their students to succeed. One hallmark in particular is stewardship, or one having fully responsibility to use God’s creations in modification. What I mean by using God’s creations in a moderate way without under usage, or more common, overusing, and polluting the planet. This source states, “St. Benedict exhorts his followers to regard all the tools and goods of the monastery as the sacred vessels of the altar” (RB 31.10). St. Benedict urges as to become aware in the larger scale to become good stewards of the planet in order to recognize how much how our natural resources we use.
Anthropocentrism is the school of thought that human beings are the single most significant entity in the universe. As a result, the philosophies of those with this belief reflect the prioritization of human objectives over the well-being of one’s environment. However, this is not to say that anthropocentric views neglect to recognize the importance of preserving the Earth. In fact, it is often in the best interests of humans to make concerted efforts towards sustaining the environment. Even from a purely anthropocentric point of view, there are three main reasons why mankind has a moral duty to protect the natural world.
The natural conservancy is an organization that is out to conserve the lands and waters on which life depends on. In this paper, I will argue that the natural conservancy organization mission statement captures the true essence of environmentalism. The mission statement of the Nature Conservancy represents the true essence of environmentalism since it recognizes the intrinsic value of all living beings while prioritizing the importance of protecting nature for future generations.