Philip Morris Case Study

705 Words2 Pages

Competitive Advantage
For Philip Morris International, the Competitive Advantage is measured with the following five factors and a rating from -6(worst) to -1(best):
• Product Quality
• Market Share
• Brand and Image
• Customer Loyalty
• Product Lifecycle
Philip Morris International focuses on providing high-quality products. The firm is known for selling some of the best tobacco products in the world. PMI earned a score of -1 on the Product Quality factor. Having the highest revenue and profit of the top tier transnational firms (this excludes CNTC who sells nearly all of their products in China), a score of -1 is given to PMI on the Market Share factor. The Brand and Image factor is scored as -1 since the Marlboro brand is one of the most recognizable brands in the world and Philip Morris is the most recognizable company of "The Big Five". PMI also earned a -1 on the Customer Loyalty factor as customers are satisfied with the product quality, consistency, safety and, ultimately, are loyal to the PMI brand they smoke. The slowing of revenue growth and the age of the
• Return on Assets
• Leverage
• Liquidity
• Revenue
• Profit
PMIs Return on Assets percentage is 20.43%, which is nearly double of the next highest ROA of the top tier tobacco product firms, British American Tobacco. The Leverage factors measured debt to equity with PMI having the lowest at -2.33 as a result of negative stockholder’s equity. It nearly has an ideal current ratio of 1.02 which measures the Liquidity factor. The Revenue and Profit are also the highest of "The Big 5," at 80.1 billion and 19.3 billion respectively. PMI scores a 6 across all of these factors.

Environmental Stability
The Environmental Stability is measured with the following five factors and a rating of -6(worst) and -1(best).
• Inflation
• Technology
• Demand Elasticity
• Competitive Pressure

Open Document