Philip Kaufman's The Unbearable Lightness Of Being

523 Words2 Pages

Film can help us rediscover dramatic relationships in our own lives and shows us how the main characters “improvise new possibilities in the real world of oppression” (Degenaar 52). Existential films such as Philip Kaufman's The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1988) offers this kind of insight. It is one of those films that is not easily forgotten and that keeps the viewer thinking long after it has ended. While it has been criticized as an inaccurate representation of Kundera's novel, it adapts the events in a more linear fashion and brilliantly captures the essence of lightness and weight. In fact, Kaufman's film so beautifully captures Kundera's concepts that 23 we hardly notice the absence of the narrator's voice. Likewise, the music in …show more content…

Sometimes it was spoken by the characters. Through Janacek's music, however, you get a sense of narrative line – of motifs and themes repeated” (qtd. In Deganaar 54). Film is an art entirely of its own and Kaufman's film visually portrays Kundera's ideas and concepts in a way that captures the essence and meaning of “the unbearable lightness of being.” The film adaptation is as poignant as Kundera’s novel and captures his philosophical commentary even though the voice of the narrator is absent. Perhaps what is most striking about the film is the way in which it adapts authorial/narratorial moments from the novel and allows the characters themselves to speak them. In the novel, Tomas never says he wishes he had two lives and two chances to compare choices—it is the narrator who presents this idea. In the film adaptation, however, Thomas tells Sabina, “If I had two lives, in one life I could invite [Tereza] to stay at my place and in the second life I could kick her out. Then I could compare and see which had been the best thing to do. But we only live once. Life’s so light.” Likewise, in both works, the reader/viewer is already aware by the end that Tomas and Tereza have

Open Document