Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Background of unions in America
Strenths of labour movement in america
Strenths of labour movement in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Background of unions in America
“The 1946 Union of Electrical, Radio and Machinist Workers’ Strike Against The Phelps-Dodge Copper Company of Elizabeth, New Jersey” reading gave insight to the Phelps-Dodge strike of 1946. Although the strike was officially about wages, it really had to do with issues regarding considerations of power (Bruno, 345). Laborers who worked at the Phelps-Dodge Copper Company shared a common bond through social and communal interaction. This helped the United Electrical Workers (UE), the union that represented these workers, as there is strength in unity. It was a good thing that the UE represented these workers as Phelps-Dodge had an infamous reputation for busting unions and ignoring its workforce (Bruno, 348). This is similar to the attempts to …show more content…
bust the strikes outside of the Botto House in Paterson, New Jersey. Many of the workers at Phelps-Dodge Copper Company were immigrants from Europe (Bruno, 349). This is also similar to many of the textile mills workers from Paterson. According to the Paterson Museum and Dr. Sidorick, many of the silk workers were immigrants who came to work for a better life. It was interesting to read about the ages of the workers.
There was an increase in young workers during World War II (Bruno, p. 360). The same increase in younger workers occurred according to the interviews of Adaline Bloom and Mary Cohen that were utilized in last week’s class. The strike was a huge win for the workers in their grievance to end discrimination in the workplace. I am currently taking an Immigration Law class and an Employment Law class and both professors are teaching about discrimination in the workplace. It is fascinating to learn about the laws and protections that employees now have against discrimination thanks to the work of unions such as the UE. An element of this reading that I found problematic was that Phelps-Dodge had such a well-known and poor reputation for intimidating workers and busting strikes. If this is the case, I question why law enforcement did nothing to stop the retaliation and how these acts were still legal. Also, police and these strikers did not have a pleasant relationship (Bruno, 367). This is similar to many other strikes learned in class about how police interfere with civil strikes. It is obvious that there was collusion between the employers/owners and the police; I also find this problematic and unjust. Not only did Phelps-Dodge hire police, they even hired Mafia figure Anthony Anastasia of Murder Incorporated to break the strike (Bruno, 368). It surprised me that employers would align itself with a shady organization …show more content…
like the mob. The UE and the strikers successfully got what they wanted despite many obstacles. McCarthyism was disastrous for the realm of labor.
Many American laborers were communists and thus became targets of the American government (Schrecker, 94). Left-led unions were under attack. The 1947 Taft-Harley Act made it so that union officials had to sign a noncommunist affidavit (Schrecker, 95). Unions are based on unity and a common form of regulation for employers. So, the anti-communist fear oppressed the power and influence of unions. The 1949 CIO convention expelled important left-led unions such as the United Electric Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE). This hurt workers, as unions no longer represented them. I find it problematic and troublesome that the federal government would go to such lengths to protect capitalism. The communist witch-hunt ruined so many individual careers and organizations such as the
UE. McCarthyism and the communist witch-hunt have always fascinated me. I am always eager to learn more about them and now I have in regards to how they impacted unions. Unions became more bureaucratic and economically secure yet social change was suppressed (Schrecker, 100). Unions, which fight for equality in the workplace, are a stepping-stone to universal change in politics such as full racial equality and universal healthcare. Capitalist cronies quashed left-led unions to preserve competitive capitalist values. The 1946 UE strike affects what I learned in the Schrecker article by capitalists wanting to break it up so that capitalist values could be preserved.
The case study of GMFC provides an example of a company attempting to avoid unionization of its workers. GMFC is expanding by building a new U.S. plant which will manufacture motorized recreational equipment. The company plans to hire about 500 production workers to assemble mechanical components, fabricate fiberglass body parts, and assemble the final products. In order to avoid the expected union campaign by the United Automobile Workers (UAW) to organize its workers, GMFC must implement specific strategies to keep the new plant union-free. GMFC’s planning committee offers suggestions with regards to the plant’s size, location, staffing, wages and benefits, and other employee relations issues in order to defend the company against the negative effects of unionization and increase...
Tensions between union supporters and management began mounting in the years preceding the strike. In April of 1994, the International Union led a three-week strike against major tracking companies in the freight hauling industry in attempts to stop management from creating $9 per hour part-time positions. This would only foreshadow battles to come between management and union. Later, in 1995, teamsters mounted an unprecedented national union campaign in attempts to defeat the labor-management “cooperation” scheme that UPS management tried to establish in order to weaken the union before contract talks (Witt, Wilson). This strike was distinguished from other strikes of recent years in that it was an offensive strike, not a defensive one. It was a struggle in which the union was prepared, fought over issues which it defined, and one which relied overwhelmingly on the efforts of the members themselves (http://www.igc.org/dbacon/Strikes/07ups.htm).
The Pullman Strike of 1894 was the first national strike in American history and it came about during a period of unrest with labor unions and controversy regarding the role of government in business.5 The strike officially started when employees organized and went to their supervisors to ask for a lowered rent and were refused.5 The strike had many different causes. For example, workers wanted higher wages and fewer working hours, but the companies would not give it to them; and the workers wanted better, more affordable living quarters, but the companies would not offer that to them either. These different causes created an interesting and controversial end to the Pullman strike. Because of this, questions were raised about the strike that are still important today. Was striking a proper means of getting what the workers wanted? Were there better means of petitioning their grievances? Was government intervention constitutional? All these questions were raised by the Pullman Strike.
The Industrial Revolution that took place after the Civil War made for a more economically sound country. American workers, however, were becoming more and more dependent upon their wages; a fear of unemployment also stemmed from this. Workers didn’t share in the benefits that their employers reaped. In a chart representing the hours and wages of industrial workers, from 1875 to 1891, it shows that even though their wages were subtly increasing, their 10-hour work day remained the same (Doc. A). Factories were headed by large corporations; this, in turn, meant that new machines lessened the amount of workers in certain fields. As a result of these unsuitable conditions, labor unions were formed. The challenges that these unions faced weren’t easy. If the workers involved in organized labor got too far out of line, these corporations could get federal authorities involved. Moreover, these companies could enforce “ironclad oaths” upon their employees. In a Western Union Telegraph Company employee contract, in 1883, it states that the employee will not be affiliated with any societies or organizations (Doc. E). Despite such setbacks, by 1872 there were over 32 national unions.
Domhoff discusses the prevalence of labor unions in the New Deal era. In fact, by 1945, with the help of the liberal-labor alliances, union membership had increased five-fold to fifteen million in that past decade (pg. 172). However, after 1945, the liberal-labor alliances never saw a victory against corporate conservatives. Because of the corporate world’s domination of policy implementation, politicians rules time and again against labor unions because it works in corporate America’s favor. Labor unions serve as many working class Americans’ avenue into the political sphere; denying them a right to unionize is not only a fundamental violation of free speech but also morally and ethically wrong. Overall, Domhoff’s critique of wealthy politicians (primarily Republicans) is merited considering he argues empirically with statistics supporting extremely skewed voting trends against unions. Additionally, Domhoff’s argument exudes sympathy toward those less fortunate; I share Domhoff’s sentiment that is imperative we promote equality amongst classes, one way in which we should do so is through advocacy of labor
against their employers, employees were able to go on strike and prove a point. Some
Union affiliation was first seen in the 1600’s when the roots of the United States were just being planted with skilled trade groups such as artisans, laborers, goldsmiths and printers. Over the next two hundred years, unions developed their desires for higher wages through the use of strikes and protests. The nation’s progress spurred the need for more labor and so began the Industrial Revolution. During the Revolution, many union members began to witness the power that employers had and as a result decided to make use of the concept of power in numbers. The National Labor Union formed in 1866 and worked to persuade congress to set a Federal eight-hour workday, which applied to government employees (Miller). Many large unions formed following in the NLU’s footsteps and uni...
Throughout the history of the United States of America the continuation of misfortunes for the workforce has aggravated people to their apex, eventually leading to the development of labor unions.
Gould, W. (1977). Black workers in white unions: Job discrimination in the United States. London: Cornell University Press.
Beginning in the late 1700’s and growing rapidly even today, labor unions form the backbone for the American workforce and continue to fight for the common interests of workers around the country. As we look at the history of these unions, we see powerful individuals such as Terrence Powderly, Samuel Gompers, and Eugene Debs rise up as leaders in a newfound movement that protected the rights of the common worker and ensured better wages, more reasonable hours, and safer working conditions for those people (History). The rise of these labor unions also warranted new legislation that would protect against child labor in factories and give health benefits to workers who were either retired or injured, but everyone was not on board with the idea of foundations working to protect the interests of the common worker. Conflict with their industries lead to many strikes across the country in the coal, steel, and railroad industries, and several of these would ultimately end up leading to bloodshed. However, the existence of labor unions in the United States and their influence on their respective industries still resonates today, and many of our modern ideals that we have today carry over from what these labor unions fought for during through the Industrial Revolution.
The paper will discuss minicases on ‘The White-Collar Union Organizer’ and ‘The Frustrated Labor Historians’ by Arthur A. Sloane and Fred Witney (2010), to understand the issues unions undergo in the marketplace. There is no predetermined statistical number reported of union memberships in this country. However, “the United Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) excludes almost 2 million U.S wages and salary employees, over half of whom are employed in the public sector, who are represented at their workplaces by a union but are not union members. Not being required to join a union as a condition of continued employment, these employees have for a variety of reasons chosen not to do so. Nor do the BLS estimates include union members who are currently unemployed” (Sloane & Witney, 2010, p.5). Given this important information, the examination of these minicases will provide answers to the problems unions face in organizational settings.
You are right about the political ties Robert, in fact it was the issue in Communication Workers of America v. Beck. In 1988, Harry Beck took his case to the Supreme Court. He did not agree with the union officials spending his hard earned money towards the promotion of political their agenda, with which he did not agree (The "Beck" Decision, and How it Affects You, n.d.). Can you believe that the union spent 79 percent of his money for purpose that was not normal union duties (The "Beck" Decision, and How it Affects You, n.d.)? Now fast-forward to the Bush and Clinton administrations, workers have regained very little of their freedom due to the fact that both administrations had very little interest in enforcing the law (Cassandra, 1998).
Throughout American history, labor unions have served to facilitate mediation between workers and employers. Workers seek to negotiate with employers for more control over their labor and its fruits. “A labor union can best be defined as an organization that exists for the purpose of representing its members to their employers regarding wages and terms and conditions of employment” (Hunter). Labor unions’ principal objectives are to increase wages, shorten work days, achieve greater benefits, and improve working conditions. Despite these goals, the early years of union formation were characterized by difficulties (Hunter).
After World War I there was a Russian Revolution in 1917 that scared many American’s which was known as the Red Scare. Bolsheviks wanted a worldwide revolution and were attempting to gain momentum. The American people saw this and thought that the United States could possibly be overthrown by communism. Though there were only about 25,000 American Communists at this time and they made themselves come off as a serious threat when a string of strikes broke out across America. There were more than 4,000 strikes that involved over 4 million workers in 1919. Government, while the majority were striking for higher wages, shorter days, and workplace control, many Americans feared the worst and believed communism was on the rise. Corporations liked
The laws and regulations surrounding Industrial Relations since the 1900’s have, at each reform, placed tighter constraints on the amount of power unions are able to exert. The reforms have also radically increased managerial prerogative, through an increased use of individual bargaining, contracts and restrictions imposed on unions (Bray and Waring, 2006). Bray and W...