Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The theme of death in literature
Death theme in literature
Essay death in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The theme of death in literature
Pet Sematary in a horror novel written by author Stephen King. The theme of Pet Sematary is Loss, and how people deal with loss. The author develops this through many different things. In Pet Sematary, there is a man named Louis, and him and his family had moved into a new village. While they were there their cat died, which led Louis’s new neighbor Jud Crandall takes Louis to this place called the Pet Semetary. Louis buries his cat in the cemetery, as he is about to inform the family that the cat is dead, the cat is back from the grave but lifeless and hostile. Jud explains to Louis that if a pet is buried in the cemetery, they are reanimated and the will return home. Louis was wondering if there had been any
Benjamin Percy uses the title “Me vs Animals” for a specific purpose and chose each word carefully. With only three words, the title conveys competition and comparison, gives the reader a connection to the essay, and instills a fear of the unknown. A title can make or break an entire piece of work. I think Percy contemplated over this title and chose three words that would accurately sum up his whole essay, with success. I would like to learn from this how to create a title that does just that.
The Maus series of books tell a very powerful story about one man’s experience in the Holocaust. They do not tell the story in the conventional novel fashion. Instead, the books take on an approach that uses comic windows as a method of conveying the story. One of the most controversial aspects of this method was the use of animals to portray different races of people. The use of animals as human races shows the reader the ideas of the Holocaust a lot more forcefully than simply using humans as the characters.
Throughout A Loss for Words, Lou Ann discusses the impact of having deaf parents played in her and her sister’s childhood. Some examples include, being an interpreter and a guide for her parents while she was growing up, causing her to more of an adult rather than being a child (Walker, 1986, p. 2). Lou Ann never minded though she loved to feel important and to help her parents, along with her two sisters, with their business affairs. It was not always easy though Lou Ann says that, “in a few instances I was an unfaithful go-between,” for instance, “the garage mechanic who refused to serve them because [her parents] were deaf” (Walker, 1986, p. 21). As children of deaf parents, Lou Ann and her sister were apart of the deaf culture, but they were also the connection to the hearing world as well. Her parents would often look to her for clues in different situations such as a thunderstorm, someone walking into a room, etc., but they never tried to place any pressure on her it simply came naturally to Lou Ann to help her parents because they relied on her. If I were Lou Ann I probably would have done the same thing, no one should feel helpless and have no one that can help them accomplish tasks that need to be done.
Many people think that reading more can help them to think and develop before writing something. Others might think that they don’t need to read and or write that it can really help them to brainstorm things a lot quicker and to develop their own ideas immediately (right away). The author’s purpose of Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, is to understand the concepts, strategies and understandings of how to always read first and then start something. The importance of this essay is to understand and comprehend our reading and writing skills by brainstorming our ideas and thoughts a lot quicker. In other words, we must always try to read first before we can brainstorm some ideas and to think before we write something. There are many reasons why I chose Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, by many ways that reading can help you to comprehend, writing, can help you to evaluate and summarize things after reading a passage, if you read, it can help you to write things better and as you read, it can help you to think and evaluate of what to write about.
In an interview published in The Vonnegut Statement, Kurt Vonnegut states that one of his reasons for writing is "to poison minds with humanity. . . to encourage them to make a better world"(107). He uses poison, not in the context of a harmful substance, but as an idea that threatens welfare or happiness. In Cat's Cradle, Vonnegut strives to disturb the complacency of his readers by satirizing humanity and its institutions, such as religion, science, and war, to name a few. If Vonnegut is successful in his endeavor, he may disturb some enough to make them see the folly of what humanity has achieved, and attempt to make some meaningful and positive changes. In some instances, however, Vonnegut hedges his bets by not relying entirely on the perception of humanity, and succumbs to the temptation of plain speaking.
Sylvia Plaths poem, Sow, depicts a beast of mythic proportions through various images, comparisons, and specific word choices. By presenting the sow from both the point of view of its owner, neighbor, and of the speaker, Plath paints a vivid picture of farmyard decadence that the reader can relate to.
In the novel “Cat’s Cradle” Kurt Vonnegut did a great job when it came to using literary techniques. So could you image a novel or a story of any kind that had a poor use of literary devices? Because it would most likely be uninteresting or just would not make much sense to the reader. If you read the novel “Cat’s Cradle” before then it probably was neither one of these things to you, in fact it would probably be the complete opposite of those two things. If you have ever read a book before then chances are that it had some form of literary devices somewhere throughout it. Kurt Vonnegut’s use of character throughout his novel “Cat’s Cradle” is the subject for this paper, and by the use of character I mean what did the author do with the characters
In the book Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer, the author talks about, not only vegetarianism, but reveals to us what actually occurs in the factory farming system. The issue circulating in this book is whether to eat meat or not to eat meat. Foer, however, never tries to convert his reader to become vegetarians but rather to inform them with information so they can respond with better judgment. Eating meat has been a thing that majority of us engage in without question. Which is why among other reasons Foer feels compelled to share his findings about where our meat come from. Throughout the book, he gives vivid accounts of the dreadful conditions factory farmed animals endure on a daily basis. For this reason Foer urges us to take a stand against factory farming, and if we must eat meat then we must adapt humane agricultural methods for meat production.
Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49, has characters such as Oedipa Maas, whose world is limited to the authors text. The reader is drawn into the story and also affected by the world created by the author. Both the reader and the characters have the same problems observing the chaos around them. The whole story is a fairy tale. Even while reading the story, you wonder why it is written in such a fashion. When you realize it was written in the l960's, you can basically see where the author is coming from. However, poor Oedipa gets a pretty hard deal throughout the tale. Why her problems seemed to be unclear is finally answered, but it takes a bit of figuring out. Odepia is considered the protagonist. After her ex-boyfriend, Pierce, leaves a complex estate to her, she begins to discover a harmful scheme taking place in Southern California. Like the reader, she is forced to involve herself in the discovery of clues. Pynchon asserts that the measure of the world is its entropy. He extends this metaphor to his fictional world. He keeps the reader involved by attempting to lead the reader down several of these paths in order to make this point. As a reader, we look for symbols to help find solutions to these questions. More than anything else, The Crying of Lot 49 appears to be about cultural chaos and miscommunication as seen through the eyes of a young woman who eventually finds herself hallucinating while watching the world coming down around her.
Death is a difficult subject for anyone to speak of, although it is a part of everyday life. In Virginia Woolf’s “The Death of the Moth”, she writes about a moth flying about a windowpane, its world constrained by the boundaries of the wood holding the glass. The moth flew, first from one side, to the other, and then back as the rest of life continued ignorant of its movements. At first indifferent, Woolf was eventually moved to pity the moth. This story shows that life is as strange and familiar as death to us all. I believe this story was well written and will critique the symbolism, characters, and the setting.
...rill-“ creates a colloquial level of language, where in this case an exclamation mark could have been used.
“From the moment that men in anyway work for one another, their labor assumes a social form” (Marx 270). On the surface, Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis appears to be a simple story of the experiences of the protagonist, Gregor Samsa, following his transformation into a “vermin.” However, a closer reading of the 1915 novella reveals its support of the ideals of Karl Marx’s theories about economics and its role in society. In a world in which monetary assets are prioritized over the human experience, workers are exploited to provide for others, creating a struggle between the upper and lower classes. Throughout The Metamorphosis, Kafka poses a critical question about the relationship between a worker and society. Gregor Samsa’s metamorphosis dramatizes the dehumanization of workers that occurs in an economic system that demands a society of undifferentiated labor in order to propel efficiency.
No matter how hard one may try, no matter how hard one pretends, the inevitable is the absolute. Cat’s Cradle, by Kurt Vonnegut explores the futility of human action or inaction in deterring the imminent. Vonnegut encapsulates this idea within the made-up religion of “Bokononism”. A religion of realism, followers of Bokononism are called to find comfort in knowing that whatever does happen was always going to happen; therefore, the inevitable is unavoidable and should be embraced.
Within family there will always be sacrifices each member makes. Sometimes we dread making these sacrifices because they prohibit us from doing things we would rather do with our time or because they simply make us unhappy, but regardless of the resentment, we are able to say that we do things for our family, which gives us a sense of pride. In the novella, “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka, the ability or inability to sacrifice one’s time for work or for the well being of one’s family create a divide between the family members. Through Gregor’s transformation from human to bug Kafka shows the family’s divide via the inevitable need for the family’s changes in roles, indirect implications of Gregor’s human disappearance, and symbols that Gregor
Andrea had finished her sandwich and she packed up the ham, cheese and bread in her