Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of euthanasia
Controversy of euthanasia
Debate against euthanasia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy of euthanasia
Madison Bowdish Mrs. Clark CP English 10 4 April 2014 Their Choice He died in 2012, six days after a high panel of judges in England denied him his request for help in ending his life. Tony Nicklinson, a fifty-eight year old man suffered from locked-in syndrome, where people lose motor function but are still awake and aware. He was depressed and angered about having everyone do everything for him and not having the ability to speak (Burns). What would you choose: a slow degrading demise like Tony or ending on your own terms with dignity? Preferably leaving this world with self-respect. Euthanasia hails from the Greek word meaning “good death,” but the explanation of the word is ‘the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent anymore suffering’ (“Facts”). It is crucial for people to have their own decision about life or death. Euthanasia needs to be legalized. Indeed euthanasia, or physician assisted suicide, is legal in four states. Oregon was the first to legalize it on November 8th, 1994 by a 51% majority vote. Following that was Washington on November 4th, 2008 with a 58% majority vote, Montana on December 31st, 2009 by a 5-4 vote, and more recently Vermont on May 20th, 2013 with Act 39. All of these states have the same requirements. …show more content…
In most countries, there is a shortage of health resources. So, if we allowed people to use euthanasia, it would open up valuable resources. Some patients who are ill and could be salvaged are not able to get quick access to the facilities they need for treatment. While at the same time, incurable people who would prefer not to keep living are using scarce health resources. Having the option of euthanasia to these people would open up health resources to people who actually wish to live (BBC “in favor”). We need to legalize euthanasia so both patient and economy can
For example, if a person is in a coma and the family believes that they will not revive, then the family should allow the patient to die because the patient is basically dead already. Furthermore, if someone is in really bad pain, then they should be able to choose euthanasia because they are suffering a lot. They might not want to die because they acknowledge it would make their family member sad, but on the other hand they are hurting and can only think about is the pain. That is when I strongly agree with Hooker that people should be able to choose euthanasia and that being euthanised is for the best. In my opinion, having a law permitting euthanasia is good because it means that the person can take control of their own life. It would be up to them whether they want to be euthanised or not, in both good and bad conditions. Just having the option can be beneficial to some because it is like having the freedom to choose to live or die. Therefore, If I was sick, I would like to have a law that permits me to choose euthanasia, because I could decide whether it is the best decision for me or
The voluntary active euthanasia is legitimately moral. It is morally right for a person to seek euthanasia because it is their freedom or autonomy to control their own lives. It ends the suffering of the patient without harming other people. Furthermore, it prevents the person to suffer by giving him/her lethal injection or medication that prevents a person to die slowly with pain. On the other hand, the arguments against euthanasia are not sound. A thorough assessment will protect patient who request euthanasia for the benefits of others. A patient who seek for euthanasia does not use him/herself as means, but as ends to respect his/her own humanity. Furthermore, God as a benevolent will not allow a person to suffer which endorse the purpose of euthanasia – to end suffering. Therefore, voluntary active euthanasia should be legalized in the United States.
Euthanasia is a situation that a lot of people would not want to go through, or experience someone else go through, but sometimes people feel like it is the right thing to do. Many people agree that euthanasia is appropriate because leaving a patient who is going to die anyways in a hospital room surviving on artificial life support or artificial feeding tubes is just taking up space. Pulling the plug gets it over and it is just going to fast forward to what is going to happen anyways. If people actually come to think of it though, Euthanasia is not a practice that should be legalized because it is cruel. Euthanasia is morally incorrect; it can be compared to the murder of another human.
Overall there are few positives for why euthanasia should be legal. With all the complications that could arise with euthanasia being legalized, it’d be nearly impossible for it to be an act for the better. Yes, it could help the terminally ill, but there are also many downfalls. Terminally ill have other options for the end of their life. In the future if euthanasia doesn’t legalize, improvements in other options could be made.
Withholding a person’s right to death is like withholding their right to life. It not only violates our constitution, and our liberties it violates the most fundamental ideas of what freedom from oppression means. 238 years ago when the United States declared independence the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were guaranteed in the opening lines. Although those ideas have rarely been true for everyone throughout history regardless of ethnicity, color or creed they have been an ideal that was strived for by those who worked to increase our liberties. These ideas have guided us out of oppression and into a freer, better world. It is time to continue embracing them, by legalizing euthanasia.
Euthanasia should be illegal because it creates too many risks and is morally wrong. Four of the main risks euthanasia would bring about if it were legalized fall under what experts call "involuntary euthanasia." The first one is "crypthanasia." This is when people are treated with euthanasia against their will. The second form of involuntary euthanasia is "encouraged" euthanasia where a patient may be encouraged or pressured into turning to euthanasia in order to spare their family from financial and emotional difficulties. The third is "surrogate" euthanasia. This "might permit euthanizing incompetent patients on the basis of 'substituted judgement' or nebulous tests of 'burdens and benefits'." Finally there is the risk of "discriminatory" euthanasia. This is the belief that "in a society in which discrimination is common and many citizens do not have access even to basic health care, the legalization of euthanasia would create another powerful tool with which to discriminate against groups, whose 'consent' is already susceptible to coercion and whose rights are already in jeopardy.
“Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a patient to limit the patient’s suffering. The patient in question would typically be terminally ill or experiencing great pain and suffering. The word “euthanasia” itself comes from the Greek words “eu” (good) and “thanatos” (death). The idea is that instead of condemning someone to a slow, painful, and undignified death, euthanasia would allow the patient to experience a relatively good death.”
Euthanasia taps into many controversial motives such as government, religion, ethics, and human rights. It is a very challenging issue to fully understand because of the different stances that can be taken on the subject. Euthanasia is the act of ending a person’s life by either lethal injection or the postponement of medical treatment. It is a way of allowing an ill patient to die with dignity. The debate of whether or not euthanasia should be legalized has gone on for many years. If a person is terminally ill, they should have the right to choose to die if they do not want to suffer any longer than they feel necessary. Society is split on whether it should be legalized due to more of the morality of the situation. Is it morally and ethically right to euthanize a person that still has a little more life to live? Should euthanasia be legalized to allow patients to have options of how to deal with their situation? Most people are open-minded to the thought of saving a terminally ill patient from suffering any more than they have already. Then there are those such as religious leaders, politicians, and doctors who are reluctant with the idea of allowing a very sick person to die without trying other treatments and methods first. Patients should have the right to choose to either fight their illness or die with dignity. Legalization of euthanasia will allow patients their right to control their life and make their own choices.
Euthanasia is considered to be a solution to suffering people when diseases and terminal conditions effect their daily functioning. Although assisted suicide is only legal in three states, some people believe that we should allow people with terminal illnesses the right to die in every state (Newton, 2013). The main reason people find that euthanasia is a good idea is because it allows people a simple death. With the use of euthanasia, the person experiences a fast and painless death unlike the painful life they have to live otherwise (Walter, 2013). As humans, we want to live a happy and healthy life. With a terminal illness people just want their pain to end, whether that be with death or by getting better. The reality of the situation is that they will not get better and just spend their days in pain until they die. By legalizing euthanasia, it gives the people an alternative when they are sick of the suffering.
Several hospitals mostly in third world countries run out of hospital space and equipment very fast. When there are individuals who are ill and can be cured they are not getting speedy access to resources because health care equipment are being used on patients who have no chance to live. Which is ineludibile if this patient wants to stay alive longer, but recurrently that is not the case. Around the world there are many cases where patients want to perform euthanasia but their wish is not being granted. I think that making the patient live longer is unintelligent as not only would it benefit the patient, it will free up valuable resources that can be used to treat patients who actually want to live. Euthanasia is again extremely beneficial to the health care system and will save the lives of patients who want to be
Euthanasia is a controversial issue because of the many ethical issues involved. Although, it can provide relief to suffering humans, but the moral standards are stretches for some because they are killing a human being. The proof for why euthanasia should or should not be used came from euthanasia books, that have both a pro and con section to the book. The other information came from euthanasia awareness websites. It could also be an economical way to save families and the government money, because euthanasia is cheaper than long term care. Therefore, euthanasia should be used because it could provide relief to the suffering person and their family.
The most common reason people commit euthanasia is to help put themselves out of the misery of their terminal illness, as they only see physical and emotional pain their future. This is because, when living with a terminal illness, it can be extremely difficult to enjoy life just like everybody else. Some rules are better than none. Euthanasia takes place every once in a while, even though it is illegal mostly all around the world. It would surely be better to legalize and regulate the treatment known as “euthanasia” and minimize the factor of abusing it rather than not having any rules at all. Patients may be at less of a risk if there were specific rules to be followed when the treatment of euthanasia is requested. A patient shouldn’t have to wait and suffer until their bodies can take no more. A patient is the possessor of his or her own life. We humans can do whatever we want with our possessions. Such as selling a new house, we should be able to wish to discontinue our lives if the reasons to do so were rational. For example, having some sort of a deadly, painful disease. No one wants to suffer. No one likes to suffer. Suffering is very painful to endure. In an article regarding a man who was cleared of all charges after helping euthanize his ill mother, stated: “She had no grave illness; she was just old and blind and did not feel like living any longer, calling her
Even though people are not in control of how they are born, they are in control as to how they will pass away. In other words, each individual has the right to control his or her body in whatever way he or she wants. Behind this ideology lies the idea that humans should also have the right to determine in what way and by whose hand he or she will die and gives rise the controversial issue of legalizing euthanasia. Even though some people argue that euthanasia gives too much power to doctors and state that alternatives exist, individuals who are in suffering should be given the choice to end their pain. With proper regulation, euthanasia should be legalized because adults have the right to terminate their lives.
For those of you that do not know, euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending someone’s life to relieve them from suffering. Coming from the Greek words ‘eu’ meaning good and ‘thanatos’ meaning death, oppositions to euthanasia sometimes misinterpret the concept of euthanasia and distinguish it as an escape to killing someone against their will. In no way is euthanasia an act to purposely kill, but instead the decision to accelerate the death of patients in an incurable condition. As human beings we are said to live in a democratic society where we are free to make decisions. Decisions of where we live, decisions of what we look like and decisions of what we say, however living a life of anguish, adversity and agony is a decision no one ever wants to make. Society should have compassion and respect to an individual’s decision whose life has become unbearable, and are we really living in a free country if we cannot even have the choice to live or not live our own lives. What is one day you found yourself terminally ill, in excruciating pain and no longer wishing to waste yo...
One bad consequence that some anticipate is that active euthanasia would weaken society's commitment to providing optimal care for dying patients. Today, our health care system is largely focused on medical costs and if patients are able to afford it or not. “Euthanasia is…a very cheap service. The cost of a dose of barbiturates and curare and the few hours in a hospital bed that it takes them to act is minute compared to the massive bills incurred by many patients in the last weeks and months of their lives” (Potts 81). If euthanasia appears to be a cheaper method than providing hospice care would this potentially have a negative effect on how patients who do not chose euthanasia are treated? This is an answer we do not know for certain but it should not be disregarded. Additionally, legalizing euthanasia would also diminish all hope. Most people have heard of a miracle story about a patient who had a limited amount of time left to live and made a shocking recovery. These doctors who made the prognosis of patients whom have made a shocking recovery against all odds “... [experience] the wonderful embarrassment of being proven wrong in his or her pessimistic prognosis. To make euthanasia a legitimate option as soon as the prognosis is pessimistic enough is to reduce the probability of such extraordinary recoveries from low to zero” (Potts 79).