Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Refugees crisis syria essay
Syrian Refugee crisis essay in brief
Syrian Refugee crisis essay in brief
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Refugees crisis syria essay
An incredible number of Syrians have recently left home in a decisive foray to seek a better life in the West. Current day estimates state the number of Syrians departing from Syria at 42,500 per day, in the long run, adding up to over 19 million people. Many of these Syrians are seeking refuge in Europe due to its close proximity and high standard of living, but many Europeans oppose the idea of allowing Syrians to enter easily. Morally, as beings with consciences, the decision to let refugees into Europe is simple: they too are humans and deserve to live good lives outside of the warzone. Unfortunately, with such restrictions as reality, the issue becomes much more complicated. For example, there are legal difficulties and impediments to …show more content…
The vast majority of the time, these countries are not equipped to handle the massive influx of people from the Middle East. Additionally, the mindset and opinions of many Syrians is contrary to the more progressive nature of many European nations. Many Muslim immigrants moving into Europe are not in favor of gender equality whereas Europeans try to promote it. Likewise, after the November 13th attacks in Paris, many Europeans are beginning to fear the true intent of some of the refugees as they can’t allow terrorists to slip into the European Union undetected. Due to legal, cultural, and security concerns, Europe cannot allow a mass influx of Syrian refugees to enter. There are many problems with allowing the Syrian refugees to enter due to European laws. Currently in Europe, there is a marked contrast between the poorer, former Soviet, Eastern European nations and the decisively wealthier Western European nations. Many Eastern Nations have not yet caught up with the West, and therefore these nations lack “the infrastructure and resources to process the massive influx of …show more content…
After the November 13th terror attacks in Paris, especially, Europeans are becoming increasingly wary and afraid of the potential for terrorists to enter Europe under the guise of legitimate refugees. The investigation which followed the attacks in Paris led to the uncovering of the fact that the attackers were European passport holders who had slipped in and out of Syria undetected, investigators also discovered a Syrian passport held by one of the attackers. The ability for potential terrorists to enter Europe as asylum seekers presents an ominous and imminent threat to Europe and Europeans. Many reforms to the Schengen Agreement, which was previously mentioned, are being proposed. These reforms do have the potential to take away from the value of unrestricted travel for innocent people though. The vast majority of European politicians want to show that they take national security and the safety of their citizens more seriously than lofty European ideals. Leaders want to find ways to improve European security without compromising the integrity of their respective nations, current attempts have proven to be ineffective. As of yet, there is not an effective way to handle the imminent threat presented by the possible presence of terrorists among Syrian refugees, because of this, Europe cannot afford to endanger its
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
In 2005 the Migration Amendment Act was introduced which relates to the notion that children must only be put in detention centres as a matter of last resort to ensure the safety of children as there had been many concerns from the Members of parliament. This new policy had given the opportunity for many children and their families to be released into community detention centres whereby there is higher security to ensure their protection. However, in Australia there had still been a substantial amount of children that had still been held in detention centres and often for lengthy periods. Although the Australian Government had attempted to comply with the new policy by gradually allowing children and their families to be released into the community
Nowadays, United States is the country that has variety of cultures, races, etc. mixing together by having immigrants in their countries. However, they need to control these group of people also. More people out of country are trying to stay in the U.S. However, this is not an easy process to deal with. There is an immigrant policy that they have to go through. In the past, United States is wide open for people to settle down on this land. There is no process of immigrants. However, in the middle of 1840 to 1880, immigrants started to come in the U.S. such as Irish and Chinese because of demanding of unskilled and cheap labors. In the 1920, automation replaced unskilled labors as a result immigrant’s policy is limited quotas for immigrants
With the introduction of the Schengen Agreement in 1985, travel and restrictions within Europe drastically changed. For the first time in the world, a large group of countries banded together and abolished any restriction on travel, creating a massive zone of free travel. Anyone who was a citizen of a country within the European union now had access to every other country also within the area, creating essentially a borderless landmass. This agreement had some major positive factors, but also some blaring negative effects. The most blaring negative side effect of the free tra...
“If the protecting of our borders requires the incarceration of babies, the sexual abuse of children, the rape of women and the murder of men, then we are of all nations the most depraved.” This emotive statement from a man of the church, Father Rod Bower, touches a nerve with many of Australians. It is an acid test on our national consciousness. The shock of disturbed beliefs pushes us to reassess the foundation of our values.
My tentative claim is that the US has to be cautious about allowing so many Syrian refugees because they could damage our economy. Some counterarguments that I might encounter are 1) it is America's humanitarian duty to help as many Syrians as we can, 2) there is a scholarly article that proves that the Syrians can help boost a country's economy, 3)the European countries that are becoming concerned with their economy cannot be related to our own situation with the Syrians because the European countries have a significant population difference and their economic system is different than our's. The first counterargument is a principle because it is an accepted norm that when a country is in trouble other countries will do as much as they can to help those affected by the troubles in their home country. The second argument is a generalization because they would be saying that if the Syrians helped the KRI (the region that was studied in the article) then it can happen in the US
Those who do not fear persecution are not considered in this definition, for instance, people escaping from natural disasters, because they do not have a fear of persecution. In addition, even though the individuals do face persecution, they are not considered as refugees if they are not ‘on the basis of’ of one of the protected grounds. Even those who face persecution on the basis of a protected ground, they cannot be declared as refugees because they are not outside their country of citizenship. The most controversial notion is that those who have been driven from their homes but who have not crossed international borders, so-called ‘Internally Displaced Persons’ (IDPs), are not in the definition of refugee, even though they have all the characteristics of a refugee except that they have not crossed an international border. The UNHCR has played their part in helping such persons in the last thirty or so years, but has still not considered them as refugees which makes them hard to have full benefits of what refugees should get. Hence, Lister aims to portray that these restrictions have a rational
Refugees have two basic choices. They can return to their home country, or they can try to settle in another country. Most refugees, however, cannot return home because conditions in their native country have not changed sufficiently to eliminate the problems from whi...
The United Nations made a conservative estimation that 850,000 refugees from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and a number of other nations in Africa and the Middle East will have made their way to Europe by the end of 2016 . Secretary of State John Kerry has stated that the influx of refugee arrivals from countries such as Syria and Iraq could be tapered by ending the Syrian Civil War . However, steps need to be taken to mitigate the current refugee crisis facing the European Union (EU). The EU has hitherto been unable to find a rapid and succinct solution to the crisis due to porous Mediterranean borders and disagreement over policy solutions . Therefore, the United States (US) should offer its support by utilizing its expansive immigrant integration
With the recent Paris attacks and rumors of foreboding ISIS attacks, the topic of immigration comes up quite often in conversations. Topics such as how the immigrants should be dealt with, what exactly are the benefits and/or detriments of immigration, Donald Trump’s immigration plan, et cetera are usually discussed. With immigration gradually becoming a trending issue, various people have expressed their thoughts through means like social media and news sites. Joining this movement, this will be another text on the topic of immigration. The benefits of immigration will be presented, false information will be proven wrong, and why some people oppose immigration will be explained and discussed. Immigration should be widely accepted rather than
The Syrian refugee crisis has become major part of international news in these past few months. Many countries are strapped of resources and will soon not be able to handle any more refugees. The Syrian people are looking to flee conflict in their country, looking for better opportunities, and better lives for their families. Recently, a letter sent by fourteen senate democrats was sent to President Obama calling for the need of the United States to allow more Syrian refugees into our borders to alleviate pressure from European nations. The numbers are staggering, the letter states that half of Syria’s 23 million people have been forced from their home along with 4 million have been registered as refugees. The main purpose of the letter is
Another casual night: the air is sticky, and the water is scarce, all throughout the country, the sound of gunshots ringing through the air. For most people, this “casual” night is beyond their wildest imagination, but for Syrians, it is an ongoing nightmare. Faced with the trauma of a civil war, Syrian refugees seek protection and a more promising future than the life they currently live in their oppressive country. Many seek refuge in other Middle East countries like Turkey and Jordan, but others search for hope in the icon of freedom, the United States of America. However, in America, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not Syrian refugees should be accepted.
The Web. The Web. 20 Jan 2014. Europe Failing Syrian Refugees. Global Issues.
Between January and November of this year, more than 750,000 migrants have been estimated crossing into the EU’s borders, compared to only 280,000 in the whole year during 2014 (www.bbc.com). This influx of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East has become a heavy burden on European Union policy makers. Many state leaders have opposing viewpoints and varying solutions to the crisis that is plaguing their region, and as a result there has been little to no action taken to solve this ever growing problem. This crisis should serve as a prime example of global cooperation, and it should highlight the ability to come together internationally and deal with important problems that affect all individuals. The solution to the refugee crisis will forever stand as a precedent for how the world deals with humanitarian issues in the future.