Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Important Of Education
Benefits of sex education
Significance of the study on gender education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Important Of Education
Although sex education is important, many students leave the classes with a warped view of sexuality and without a good understanding of safe-sex practices and how to properly use contraception. In most sex education programs, teenage students only learn that they should not have sex until they are married. This type of program has gained popularity in public schools across the nation because of a law giving nearly half of a billion dollars to schools that agree to teach the programs. Abstinence-only programs intend to persuade young people to wait until marriage before engaging in sexual activity, but they are not achieving this goal and are blemished by the twisted and biased view that they promote. The United States government …show more content…
A study of programs promoting abstinence was released by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in 2007. The study, involving more than 2000 students, was funded by the federal government. The creators uncovered that “findings from this student provide no evidence that abstinence programs implemented in upper elementary and middle schools are effective in reducing the rate of teen sexual activity” (“Impacts”). They concluded that the “findings indicate that youth in the abstinence-only programs were no more likely” than students not in abstinence-only programs “to have abstained from sex” (“Impacts”). Furthermore, among the students in the study who said they engaged in sex, they had “similar numbers of sexual partners and had initiated sex at the same mean age” (“Impacts”). It would appear that pupils did not gain from all of the effort and the nearly half of a billion taxpayer dollars that have been put into this outrageous strategy. Another study conducted at Columbia University by Peter Bearman indicates that “88 percent of those who pledged chastity reported having had sexual intercourse before they married” (Altman). Dr. Bearman also says that by telling teenagers “to ‘just say no’, without understanding risk or how to protect oneself from risk, turns out to create greater risk of sexually transmitted diseases” (Altman). Dr. Paige S. Herweck is a doctor who contributed to a report on teen sexual activity by the American Academy of Pediatrics. She reported that “teaching abstinence but not birth control makes it more likely that once teenagers initiate sexual activity, they will have unsafe sex and contract sexually transmitted diseases” (“Doctors Slam Abstinence”). Teenagers are taught to “just say no” to sex in programs that promote abstinence. They are not taught the facts that are necessary for
The primary argument which most advocates for abstinence only education have is that sex before marriage is immoral, not appropriate and that abstinence is the only completely effective method of preventing teen pregnancy and STI contraction. These advocates also emphasize that condoms are not a sure-fire way of preventing pregnancy and STI contraction. Many of the proponents for abstinence-only education believe that educating youth with information concerning sex and contraception will embolden them to become to begin or increase sexual activity. Such advocates accredit the lowering of teenage pregnancy to abstinence only education (Collins, Alagira, and Summers 12-13).
It has been almost thirty three years since the first federal funding was put to use in “. . . sex education programs that promote abstinence-only-until-marriage to the exclusion of all other approaches . . .” according to the article “Sex education” (2010) published by “Opposing Viewpoints in Context;” a website that specializes in covering social issues. Since then a muddy controversy has arisen over whether that is the best approach. On one hand is the traditional approach of abstinence (not having sex before marriage), and on the other is the idea that what is being done is not enough, and that there needs to be a more comprehensive approach. This entails not only warning against sex, but also teaching teens about how to have “Safe Sex” (“Sex Education,” 2010).
Today’s young Americans face strong peer pressure to be sexually active and engage themselves in risky behaviors (Merino 100-109). Anyone deciding to have sex must first think about all the risks involved. Kekla Magoon, author of Sex Education in Schools, says that “half of all teens aged 15 to 19 years old in the United States have had sex” (Magoon 64-65). It is currently not required by federal law for schools to teach Sex education and those few schools that do teach Sex education have the decision to determine how much information is allowed. Advocates from both sides of the Sex education debate agree that teens need positive influences in order to make practical decisions (Magoon 88-89). Opponents of Abstinence-only education believe it fails because it does not prepare teens for all the risks of sex (Magoon 64-65).
Students should be informed about more than just “don’t have sex” because eventually it is going to happen and they need to be educated on the proper way to handle the situations. Because students are mostly taught abstinence it has created the situation to where researchers find” Abstinence-only education, instead of reducing the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, has made teenagers and young adults more vulnerable to ST...
In the United States, there are many school districts that are not required to teach sex education at all. Instead, these districts teach what they call “abstinence-only education”. This education is to teach teens and young adults about not having sex, instead of how to have sex safely. So, is abstinence-only education effective enough to continue it in these districts?
Rose states that sex educations in many schools are fueled by an evangelist viewpoint, which promotes information that may oftentimes not even be medically accurate. The main conflict with the promotion of a sex education that is intertwined with evangelist viewpoints, is that the education provided is not accurate, nor realistic, and therefore can be more harmful to students than helpful. The sex education programs provided revolve around programs that advocate abstinence-only relations. The issue with promoting abstinence-only sexual education programs, as noted by Rose, is that the programs do not halt many social problems that can be solved by promoting factually based sex information to young adults. An important factor to consider when evaluating the damage created by abstinence-only programs, is the fact that they do not prepare teenagers and young adults with the information to decide on safer choices when it revolves around their own autonomy. Rose supports her claim with information that proves that abstinence programs do not work in the manner in which its advocates wish it will; she reveals information that locations with only religious based abstinence only programs have higher rates of teenage pregnancy, which contrasts to areas having
Santelli, J., Ott, A., Lyon, M., Rogers, J., Summers, D., &Schelifer, R. (2006). Abstinence and abstinence-only education: A review of U.S. policies and programs. Journal of Adolescent Health 38 p.p.72-81.
The government likes to pretend that if high school students get taught the “abstinence-only” method they would never think of taking part in sexual activities. Statistically this is incorrect. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, “56 percent of high school students are virgins”(Martin). For the 56 percent abstinence only is doing them well, but there are still 44 percent of high school students engaging in sex without knowing the precau...
Additionally, Dr. S. Paige Hertweck, a doctor who contributed to an American Academy of Pediatrics report on teen sexual activity, states that “teaching abstinence, but not birth control makes it more likely that once teenagers initiate sexual activity they will have unsafe sex and contract sexually transmitted diseases” (“Doctors Denounce Abstinence-only Education”). In South Carolina, state law severely restricts sex education. There can be no discussion of contraception except with reference to marriage, no discussion of abortion, and nothing said about homosexuality except reference to preventing sexually transmitted disease (Caplan). Instead of aiding students, in order to prevent harmful diseases or pregnancy, Abstinence sex education promotes ‘waiting’, which does not prevent teen sexual activity. Saying the only way to avoid pregnancy and STDs is by avoiding sex altogether is like saying that to avoid a skiing injury; do not ski. Now don’t get me wrong, I think abstinence and virginity is a beautiful thing. But virginity is not an inanimate object. You are a human being, not a flower or a unicorn or any other kind of weird analogy. But being touched by other people doesn't make you worthless. Having sex doesn't make you unworthy of love. Being a virgin is not your lone function in this world.
Certain religious groups’ perspective on comprehensive sex education is that learning about “sex before marriage” will provoke our youth to engage in sexual behaviors. Although some people believe that comprehensive sex education will lead to sexual activity, studies have shown that abstinence-only programs are related to increased pregnancy and birth rates among teens (“Facts…”). Comprehensive sex education programs encourage abstinence, but also teach about contraceptives and the consequences of unhealthy sexual behaviors. Classes that teach abstinence, as well as the use of protection, are the most realistic and effective way to reduce teen pregnancy and STDs.
Teen abstinence programs neglect to teach teens about their bodies and sexual reproduction, as they typically just focus on the religious ideology of saving sex for marriage. Refusing to teach about contraception and sexual health can lead to unwanted pregnancies and contraction of STDs that can be left untreated because of a fear of judgement. Shame and fear tactics are also commonly used in abstinence only education, and this leads to insecurity and oftentimes slut
The glamorous side of sex is everywhere; music, tv shows, movies and social media. To a mature adult, it is easy to ignore the sexual messages in those outlets. However, to a teenager, going through mental and physical changes and peer pressure, it is extremely easy to fall for what is shown to “cool.” Everyone has fallen for half truths to be cool in their teenage life. It just so happens that teen pregnancies and STDs are not one of those things that one can simply walk away from. Babies and STDs leave a lasting effect on everyone involved. The National Conference of State Legislatures states:
Sex education has been a taboo subject for a long time, even out of schools. Usually an ignored topic of discussion, when adults would be asked such questions by younger individuals the answers were usually misinformation and complex euphemisms. This strategy, use merely so the adult avoided embarrassing themselves, would only further confuse the person asking and it would not even answer the original question. Such examples include babies being brought to the parents by a stork, the birds and the bees, and naming the sexual organs after objects. Due to culture, such customs have been hard to get rid of and improve upon, especially with many of this shame originating from organized religion. In recent years though, conservatism on this education
Before moving on, one must know that sex education is about, but not limited to the discussion of sexual intercourse. As a Buzzle article states, it involves a multitude of topics that introduce human sexual behaviors such as puberty, sexual health, sexual reproduction, sexuality, and more (Iyer). If formally received in school, these topics are brought up and discussed at age-appropriate times over the course of children’s junior high and high school education. Moreover, as I have introduced earlier, the way sex education should be taught is divided into two approaches. It is between taking either a conservative, abstinence-only approach or a more liberal, comprehensive approach. Abstinence-only education, approaches students by stressing the importance of “no sex before marriage” as be...
I believe that schools should teach sexual education. I think this because kids that are in school during this age do know or respect the dangers of being sexual active. They don 't know what it means to be protected, They will know about their own bodies and that of other genders. I believe they will have a new found respect for themselves and others. Teaching about it encourages students to develop themselves into better people. Anyone who values themselves and others are better equipped to develop great relationships with others. Pupils are able to take great positive approaches to managing their lives and develop skills that are needed to prepare them for the challenges that lay ahead. Not all parents inform their children about sexual