Persuasive Essay On Right Or Wrong

687 Words2 Pages

Since the first day of humanities the right and wrong was and still hard to define. The definition of right and wrong is differentiating from place to another and from one culture to another and even within the same culture. In this paper I will argue that there is not such thing to justify that an act is right if the rest act the same way in similar circumstances.
To start this discussion let consider a person X who is stealing others belonging. This act is not acceptable by most people, but what about if every body starts stealing can this act be justified or become right?according to Kant’s deontological moral theory, the rightness or wrongness of action does not depend on their consequence but on whether they fulfill our duty. As a result of this theory stealing in our case is justified simply because it satisfies the person desire to get thing that other people spend their own money to own. So if we accept the fact that steeling is not wrong then everybody will start doing it. As a result the society and civilization at large will be collapse. One could argue that the act of stealing is happening because the person is in need. But how we can scale this needs? The human by nature are greedy, so they will never stop asking for more and more.
If we all agree that a wrong act done by all people, then this act will transform to a right act. Take for example the homosexuality. It was until a few years ago a wrong act .It was rejected as a bad act. Now, if all population shift to homosexuality this act will be right. Although this sequence appears to be logically true .It would be wrong to claim that same gender can married to same gender and have children. Because the nature does not allow such thing to happen. This is why the ri...

... middle of paper ...

... But if you don't believe in God, can you still believe in objective morality? To explain more do you believe that What are "right" and "wrong" today will be that way for all times and all cultures?. I don’t think so as we discussed earlier for the homosexuality.
Ones can argue that there is a subjective morality. Any idea of right or wrong come up with by a human is by definition subjective. That's all well and good. Problem is that it only applies to people who believe in it and it gives them no authority to proclaim anything as "what we should be doing." Very often everybody disagrees with each other and we don't get anywhere.
Weighing the pros and cons .I come to the conclusion that Without God, there is no such thing as right and wrong, only the things we call right and wrong. And since nobody can agree on what to call what, we're all in a lot of trouble

Open Document