Persuasive Essay On Dna Databank

636 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Chapter 1: Database Systems

A DNA database or databank is the data storage of DNA profiles. These storages can be used in multiple ways, including the analysis of genetic diseases, fingerprinting, and genealogy. The largest are national databases. The types of databases include Forensic DNA database, Genetic genealogy database, and Medical DNA database. There are national databases found in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and even the United States. The controversy over the databases begins with the people’s concern that their privacy is being abused. With the DNA database, anyone who can access the information of any individual now has access to them and their family. With some databases expanded to include those who have merely been arrested, there are concerns …show more content…

Under the control of the government, it would lead to much advancement. Forgotten crimes would resurface and be solved, and improve overall health of citizens. A DNA databank would prove invaluable in its ability to aid in the apprehending of criminals. Also, locating and identifying disaster victims would prove easier as well. Also assuming that DNA is left at the scene of almost every crime, fighting crime would be easier than ever. A process that would normally take days, weeks, months, maybe even years to solve would now take little to no time. The potential is limitless. The narrowing down of suspects from possible thousands to a smaller group also proves valuable.
Inducing a DNA databank would help diminish or eliminate discrimination, as it would be all-inclusive and steer clear of any majorities or minorities. Gender and racial bias would be practically eliminated. Also, having a larger databank rather than a smaller, less inclusive databank, is less costly. Privacy needn’t be an issue, as one of the main functions of the government is to maintain the privacy of its people. The simple act of collecting genetic information offers no insight into the private lives of any

Show More
Related

  • CODIS - IT'S NOT JUST FOR FELONS ANYMORE

    1156 Words  | 3 Pages

    The National DNA Index (NDIS) contains over 8,483,906 offender profiles and 324,318 forensic profiles as of June 2010 (Federal Bureau of Investigations, 2010). It has been suggested by Froomkin, a Senior Washington Correspondent, that the FBI is “shifting its resources from forensics to feeding the database” (Froomkin, 2010). This dramatic shift curtails some of the benefits of the CODIS application to the criminal justice system, as the backlogs of DNA samples increase and the statutes of limitations grow nearer and nearer on unsolved crimes.

    Read More

  • Human Genetic Screening and Discrimination in Gattaca

    1808 Words  | 4 Pages

    I will begin by clearing up some misconceptions and explaining some of the current shortcomings of DNA testing. It is not possible to completely genotype a person "instantly" as in the movie. We are only able to discern the markers of some diseases that are genetically linked. This takes time, is labor intensive, and easy to contaminate. Studies to make the process quicker and cleaner...

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Today

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    The more we know about genetics and the building blocks of life the closer we get to being capable of cloning a human. The study of chromosomes and DNA strains has been going on for years. In 1990, the Unites States Government founded the Human Genome Project (HGP). This program was to research and study the estimated 80,000 human genes and determine the sequences of 3 billion DNA molecules. Knowing and being able to examine each sequence could change how humans respond to diseases, viruses, and toxins common to everyday life. With the technology of today the HGP expects to have a blueprint of all human DNA sequences by the spring of 2000. This accomplishment, even though not cloning, presents other new issues for individuals and society. For this reason the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) was brought in to identify and address these issues. They operate to secure the individuals rights to those who contribute DNA samples for studies. The ELSI, being the biggest bioethics program, has to decide on important factors when an individual’s personal DNA is calculated. Such factors would include; who would have access to the information, who controls and protects the information and when to use it? Along with these concerns, the ESLI tries to prepare for the estimated impacts that genetic advances could be responsible for in the near future. The availability of such information is becoming to broad and one needs to be concerned where society is going with it.

    Read More

  • The Themes Of DNA And Ridley's Genome By Matt Ridley

    1954 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of society’s problems is that the wrong people are convicted of a crime they did not commit. None have more dire consequences on those than who are wrongly convicted of rape and murder. The punishment for these crimes are as harsh as possible to deter the crimes and when wrongly convicted, the wrong person gets punished while the true perpetrator gets away. In order to increase the chance of convicting the true perpetrator of the crime, the tools to find and convict criminals had to be refined. And it was refined due to extensive research into DNA. This research was done by Alec Jeffreys and Vicky Wilson, the research’s technician, and it found that in the massive amount of junk codes, there exists many repetitious codes that have copied so many times that it varies from person to person. (Ridley 132) This means that people can be identified with only their DNA from their hair, fluids, skin, etc. This discovery has led to convictions of rapists and murderers such as the Pickford case that Ridley wrote about. It has also led to the sentences of many wrongly convicted people to be retracted and this had led to the release of about 200 people known as the DNA 200. (Phelan) Now, most of the world keeps criminals’ genotype information in order to identify repeat offenders. In the United States, every state requires that every convicted

    Read More

  • Computer Matching Versus Privacy

    2152 Words  | 5 Pages

    With the advent of new computer technologies, the ease with which new information can be discovered from aggregating data sources is astounding. This technique is called computer matching. When it comes to doing research this can be an incredible source of new ideas and correlations between sets of data. However, this same technique can be applied to information about individual people. Suddenly, by pulling together disparate sources of data, private information can be learned about an individual without their knowledge or consent. If the organization that is capable of computer matching is a government, it places a lot of information in the hands of a powerful entity. A question of whether the government should have this new information is a significant one.

    Read More

  • The Forensic Science: The History Of DNA In Forensic Science

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    DNA in forensic science has been around for a long time. DNA has had help in solving almost every crime committed. There have been a lot of crimes where people are raped or murdered and the person who did it runs free. Scientists can collect the littlest item they see at the scene, such as a cigarette butt or coffee cup and check it for DNA. People have spent years in jail for a crime they didn’t commit till DNA testing came into effect. People are getting out of jail after 20 years for a crime they didn’t commit, cause of the DNA testing. DNA has helped medical researchers develop vaccines for disease causing microbe. DNA has become a standard tool of forensics in many murders and rapes.

    Read More

  • Genetic Information vs Privacy

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    The genetic technology revolution has proved to be both a blessing and a blight. The Human Genome Project is aimed at mapping and sequencing the entire human genome. DNA chips are loaded with information about human genes. The chip reveals specific information about the individuals’ health and genetic makeup (Richmond & Germov 2009).The technology has been described as a milestone by many in that it facilitates research, screening, and treatment of genetic conditions. However, there have been fears that the technology permits a reduction in privacy when the information is disclosed. Many argue that genetic information can also be used unfairly to discriminate against or stigmatize individuals (Willis 2009).

    Read More

  • Personal Privacy and the Government

    1395 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States government is up to its ears in the personal information it has collected from its citizens. Americans are becoming increasingly “aware of these slowly eroding walls of privacy,”(Hirsh) and more than half polled admit concern “about the overall accumulation of personal information about them “by […] law enforcement, government, […] and other groups,” though “they accept it as an unavoidable modern phenomenon” (Hirsh). The question is, how far is too far to trust the government with the collection, proper storage, and usage of this information? Studies show that “Americans believe that business, government, social-media sites, and other groups are accessing their most personal information without their consent” (Hirsh). People should be given the ability to admit or deny access to their personal information. The government does not have a right to use whatever information it wants for any purpose it wishes. Michael Hayden, once the NSA director for seven years, says, “Even I recognize that it's one thing for Google to know too much, because they aren't putting me in jail. It's another thing for government, because they can coerce me” (Hirsh). The United States government's ability to collect information about its citizens and residents should be restricted by what kind of information it can take, how it can acquire it, and what it can use it for.

    Read More

  • Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations

    2857 Words  | 6 Pages

    Before the 1980s, courts relied on testimony and eyewitness accounts as a main source of evidence. Notoriously unreliable, these techniques have since faded away to the stunning reliability of DNA forensics. In 1984, British geneticist Alec Jeffreys of the University of Leicester discovered an interesting new marker in the human genome. Most DNA information is the same in every human, but the junk code between genes is unique to every person. Junk DNA used for investigative purposes can be found in blood, saliva, perspiration, sexual fluid, skin tissue, bone marrow, dental pulp, and hair follicles (Butler, 2011). By analyzing this junk code, Jeffreys found certain sequences of 10 to 100 base pairs repeated multiple times. These tandem repeats are also the same for all people, but the number of repetitions is highly variable. Before this discovery, a drop of blood at a crime scene could only reveal a person’s blood type, plus a few proteins unique to certain people. Now DNA forensics can expose a person’s gender, race, susceptibility to diseases, and even propensity for high aggression or drug abuse (Butler, 2011). More importantly, the certainty of DNA evidence is extremely powerful in court. Astounded at this technology’s almost perfect accuracy, the FBI changed the name of its Serology Unit to the DNA Analysis Unit in 1988 when they began accepting requests for DNA comparisons (Using DNA to Solve Crimes, 2014).

    Read More

  • Privacy Concerns

    1644 Words  | 4 Pages

    Most studies have shown that popular opinion holds that without a doubt national DNA databases have proved useful in criminal investigations (Wallace, 2006, pS27). The concept of a national DNA database has raised concern about privacy and human rights as seen through the scope of public safety. All of these concerns are elevated with databases include convicted, arrestee, innocent, and “rehabilitated” offenders (Suter, 2010, p339). Robin Williams of University of Duham (2006) asserts that:

    Read More

  • What is Privacy?

    1879 Words  | 4 Pages

    All humans have some desire for privacy, but people have different boundaries to what information about them should be private. Problems arise with these widely varying definitions. What one person may define as a casual curiosity, another may define as a blatant invasion of privacy. Often, these disagreements find themselves in court rooms, and have been subjects of some of the most controversial court cases ever.

    Read More

  • Genetic Testing and The Diagnosis of Genetic Diseases

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is patients’ right to opt for genetic testing on their own DNA, although they are accepting a great risk by doing so. DNA is unique to each individual, present in each individual since conception, and influences who each individual is, so the information contained within it belongs to each patient, despite the risks. Such risks include DNA testing services providing results to potential employers or insurers, who can make decisions at the disadvantage of the patients if high disease probabilities are discovered. The results can also cause patients to react emotionally poorly and make negative changes to their lifestyles. Although risky, patients deserve the rights to take these risks if they choose to do so.

    Read More

  • Individual Privacy versus National Security

    1933 Words  | 4 Pages

    The word “privacy” did not grow up with us throughout history, as it was already a cultural concept by our founding fathers. This term was later solidified in the nineteenth century, when the term “privacy” became a legal lexicon as Louis Brandeis (1890), former Supreme Court justice, wrote in a law review article, that, “privacy was the right to be let alone.” As previously mentioned in the introduction, the Supreme Court is the final authority on all issues between Privacy and Security. We started with the concept of our fore fathers that privacy was an agreed upon concept that became written into our legal vernacular. It is being proven that government access to individual information can intimidate the privacy that is at the very center of the association between the government and the population. The moral in...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Individualized Medicine

    1220 Words  | 3 Pages

    Individualized medicine should be strictly used for health preventions, but some fear that people might abuse this information by using it to find potential partners. There isn’t a doubt that the advanced technology won’t change the culture, but will it be in a positive way if people decide to use it to find their “perfect” partner in life? Another reason why many oppose the idea of individualized medicine is because they fear who will control the sequencing information. If they don’t have control of their own data information, will the government? This topic gets discussed heavily because currently individuals aren’t allowed to access their own genetic information, and many wonder if that will change if the new system is implemented in the daily lives of people (Patel, 2015, p.g 1) Also, the amount of genetic information the DNA sequencing would provide would be a vast amount, so the data would need to be stored in a secured place in order to prevent cyber-attacks from occurring.

    Read More

  • The Role of Computers in the Criminal Justice Field

    609 Words  | 2 Pages

    This can make the process of narrowing down suspects much easier. Databases of citizens’ personal information can also be found. Therefore a person could be found easily when needed for questioning.

    Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Dna Databank

Open Document