Personality Assignment

985 Words2 Pages

Personality Assignment by Thomas Mboto Today, many researchers and psychologists believe that they are five fundamental dimensions of personality – often referred to as “The Big Five” or “FFM”: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and openness. This theory – unlike Cattell’s theory, which was deemed to be too complex, and Eysenck’s, which was said to be incomplete – emerged to describe the basic traits that serve as the building blocks of personality (Cherry, n.d). Highly extraverted individuals are assertive and sociable, rather than quiet and reserved. Agreeable individuals are compliant and polite, rather than hostile and indecorous. Conscientious individuals are goal-oriented and orderly, rather than impulsive and disorganized. Neurotic individuals are prone to experiencing negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, and irritation, rather than being emotionally stable. Lastly, highly open individuals have a wide-range rather than narrow range of interests, are sensitive rather than indifferent to art and beauty, and prefer peculiarity to social norms (Soto & Jackson, 2013). Evidence of this theory has been mounting over the past 50 years, beginning with the research of D. W. Fiske (1949) and later prolonged upon by other researchers including Norman (1967), Smith (1967), Goldberg (1981), and McCrae & Costa (1987) (Cherry, n.d). IPIP-NEO Narrative Report My score on Extraversion is high (92), suggesting that I am sociable, outgoing, energetic, and lively. Gregariousness is the facet I scored the highest (99), while Activity Level is the facet I scored the lowest (49). My score on Agreeableness is low (30), suggesting less concern with others' needs than with my own. Trust is the facet I scored ... ... middle of paper ... ...to account all of the disadvantages I have mentioned, I would close by stating that the biggest weakness of standardized self-report inventories is, consequently, the validity of the scores. Since one’s scores are manifested in contrast to other people’s scores, the chain reactions of skewed scores are inevitable. In conclusion, unlike tools, personalities are not (though arguably) man made. They are far greater in number, as well as complexity. No theory – like that of ‘Supply and Demand’ or ‘The Big Five’ – can be applied to bring forth a test of any kind that will objectively depict one’s personality, and the traits that underlay it. To the defense of standardized self-report inventories, however, I will say, they are more efficient and more accurate than people in general – who “judge more by the sense of sight than by the sense of touch…”(Machiavelli, 1513).

Open Document