Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of memory in human life
The role of memory in human life
What makes me who I am
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of memory in human life
Based on Miller, what essential properties that make who I am is essentially connected to my soul. I can continue to exist without a body and still be able to contain memories and thoughts even though I lack the physical properties of a body. Even without the physical properties of having a body, I would still be who I am based on how our soul is connected to our being, in which we can still be able maintain memories, thoughts, experiences and even feelings. Thus, even though we have no physical properties, it does not change who we are, because we are not our bodies, we are our souls and our being, which gives us properties of ourselves. Memories, experiences, and thoughts shape who we are and our soul reflects the properties of what makes
who a person is. Even if a person was in a different body, they still would be the same person, because our belief of ourselves and our souls reflect the properties of who we are. Our body does not determine or control our memories or thoughts, so there is no reason for me to believe that changing our physical appearance would change who we are if our souls determine what makes us, us.
The soul is linked to a body and through our bodies it can hold our apparent memories of the past that can give us evidence of our identity over time with diachronic personal identity theory. We typically identify people by things like their physical appearance and the sound of their voice, but it is hard to personally identify someone in terms of physical appearance and sameness of voice. Therefore, it can be explained in terms of our memories and sameness of our brains. On the psychological theory, which explains personal identity in terms of apparent memory, but to explain why my apparent memories justify me in believing that the same immaterial soul has been attached to my body for the duration of my life. Therefore, Swinburne’s counter argument is based on memory and perception based on the body. With memory playing into an effect, the certain religions that specify that the soul will live on into reincarnation is a slim chance and that know could know for sure if it is absolutely
Our soul has already had to have these concepts before birth. Which brings him to believe the soul is capable of existing without the body, and so it is immortal.
In conclusion, life without experience or memory is meaningless. When all freedom is taken away from an
... identity also is lost after death according to the memory criterion because memories are unable to be caused in the right way after death. Any reproduction of memories, by God or anyone else, would not be caused in the right way. Even if memories were able to be transported to another entity, the psychological elements of identity are not able to be. Consequently, the memory/psychological criterion does not allow for survival after death. Thus the objection of survival after death does not sufficiently reject one criterion over the other.
The argument begins by making a distinction between corruptibility and incorruptibility. This distinction made is that because the body is corruptible, and the soul is viewed as a substance that is incorruptible, an explanation is needed as to how the soul can continue
It states that there is more to a person than just a collection of memories. A person is also defined by their desires, motives and beliefs. There is clearly a distinction between someone who likes to fight with others. Simply put, for identical persons to be identical, they must share memories, as well as their personality and beliefs. To add on to that, identical persons must share a quasi-desire, which is a desire that is not tied to personal identity to escape redundancy. For a desire to be accepted without being circular, it can’t presuppose identity. A quasi-desire, similar to a quasi-memory, is an apparent desire that is caused by a real desire. For instance, a certain person has an aggressive and merciless attitude, which leads to certain desires. The apparent desires are indirectly connected with the deeper motives and beliefs of the person in question. The insufficiency objection ultimately leads to the creation of a new theory, the psychological continuity theory, why states that identical persons are identical if they directly quasi-remember and quasi-desire the same thing, they can be considered psychologically
On the other hand, in Why the “You” in an Afterlife Wouldn't Really Be You, by Michael Shermer he presents the theory behind how our identities are formed in our heart and that we are reincarnated to another life. He also suggests that our lives are nothing to care about since we do not have control over our lives in the first place. He compares one's organs to pieces of a computer that suggest that they only support it and all that’s left afterward is the identity which is kept in the heart. In the article it says, “First, there is the assumption that our identity is located in our memories, which are presumed to be permanently recorded in the brain: if they could be copied and pasted into a computer or duplicated and implanted into a resurrected
This idea is frightening to me, because it means that no matter who you are in this moment, it is subject to change. Not that I want to remain who I am at the present time forever, but what if I don’t want to be who I am in the future. Similar to this idea is the main character in the article, Five Features of Reality, who was a man living in the city until such time as he went out into the forest to live with basically a band of savages. “I saw within myself too many seeds that would grow a fungus around my brain, encasing it with mold that could penetrate and smooth the convolutions and there I would remain, not he who had travelled and arrived, not the me who had crossed the mountains in a search, but another me living only in ease and pleasure…”(Mehan&Wood 392). In this instance, after a period of time, he changed his entire reality through this interaction shared with these new people. Who he was previously disappeared and was replaced with a man that has expressed cannibalistic behaviors. Yes, he was able to revert back to who he was before and return home at the end of the ordeal, but he was not the same. He was aware of the fact that he was no longer the same after this because of his interactions and experiences. “The most important outcome of the socialization process is the development of a sense of self”(Newman
An axe can chop because it has a certain organization. When we say that an axe chops because of its form or organization, however, we do not mean that this form or organization does anything over and above what the composite axe (form and matter) does. Rather, the axe can chop because it has a certain form or organization. The axe can chop because it is arranged this way. Likewise, if one was to read the claim that ‘if an axe had a soul, it would be its ability to chop’ in a certain way, he or she would be lead to think that the soul, like the axe’s ability to chop, does not explain the activities of the body by doing anything over and above what the body does. Akin to the axe organization, the soul/form of a living body is the way that this living body is organized. Moreover, just like all capacities that come from being organized in a certain way, the soul does not explain activities of organized whole by doing anything. Rather, the soul explains perception by explaining how a body, organized in a certain way, (a body that has a soul), can undergo changes that are perception. This is what someone who thinks that the soul is a functionally useful structure or arrangement would have to say about this
When we are born into the world, it is far from our last birth. The birth of our identities begins as we grow. And while not right or wrong, it is how our minds take on an identity during our key developmental years.
He does so by addressing how in the past “Philosophers used to think that there were definite substances, the soul and the body, that each lasted on from day to day, that a soul, once created, continued to exist throughout all future time, whereas a body ceased temporarily from death till the resurrection of the body” (Russell 1957, 377). He states that this idea is obviously false because the matter of our bodies is constantly changing. He proceeds to make an analogy of how “Our memories and habits are bound up with the structure of the brain, in much the same way in which a river is connected with the riverbed” (Russell 1957, 377).... ... middle of paper ...
Weirod says what if the soul changes daily or perhaps yearly, and that every time it changes its with a different soul that has similar psychological characteristics as the last soul, how would one be able to measure that, if the soul cannot be seen or touched? How would one know that their soul isn’t changing constantly if there is no way for them to find out or more importantly prove it? Weirod clearly states if the soul cannot be observed it cannot be associated with the body. In other words, soul has no identity. With that being said, Weirod claims that if there isn’t anyway of proving having a soul, there can’t be any prediction that the soul will be with her or in this case with anyone in the afterlife as it is with her and us now. That claim made by Weirod can be supported by her saying that when she dies she will be buried and rot away and perhaps there is no afterlife at all.
Well, who really am I? Am I rude, strict or obnoxious? Or am I loving and caring? Think and know me better.
The soul is the battery to the body; the soul allows the body to be a living thing. The soul is the spark that sets fire to the body. The body acquires life, emotion, senses and intelligence with the fusion of the soul. Plato believes that the soul is not composed of parts that can be decomposed or destroyed. When the body dies, the soul is separated from the body and travels to the invisible realm keeping all the knowledge acquired. For Plato, death is a good thing because it sets the soul free. The soul becomes it is truly self; pure, full of wisdom, good, and beautiful. However, when the soul introduces a new body the soul forgets its knowledge, but over time the soul recollects memories by learning. Plato proves this theory when, “In reference to an uneducated slave b...
Each philosopher gathers differing views on the theory of personhood. The legal concept of a person initially tries to follow the moral concept of a person. In philosophy, “the genetic definition of personhood precludes the possibility of a person remaining the same person after death. If who you are is made up of a genetic code, then that genetic code dies when the person dies” (Moon Lecture 8). Many of these philosophers believe that each person attains an immortal soul which presumes the possibility of an afterlife.