Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elaborate on the relevance of performance management
Importance of performance management for the organization
Importance of performance management for the organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elaborate on the relevance of performance management
Introduction
Every organization faces a shortage of resources including skilled human resources. This necessitates the emphasis on performance so that organizations can hire as few employees as possible while raising performance to the highest possible levels. Contemporary managers have the task to raise employee motivation so as to raise employee performance. This means that managers have to provide timely performance feedback so as to give direction to employees. Performance feedback is not a one-off issue but is a critical constituent in the continuous enhancement of contemporary workforce improvement (Anseel, Lievens, & Schollaert, 2009, p. 24). Performance feedback equips employees with the knowledge to modify their behavior so as to improve their individual and consequently group performance. At the absence of performance feedback employees are left in guesswork as they contemplate which areas to focus more efforts so as to develop professionally.
Aguinis, Gottfredson, & Joo (2012, p. 105) define performance management as the provision of information concerning an employee’s past conduct with respect to the stated goals and standards of behavior and results. The objective of performance feedback is to help the employee improve individual as well as team performance, employee engagement and motivation and ultimately job satisfaction. While there is consensus that performance feedback help in the attainment of the foregoing organizational goals, managers often find themselves uncomfortable in providing performance feedback. On other occasions, the provided feedback does greater harm than good with regard to helping employees to change behavior and improve performance. Aguinis, Gottfredson, & Joo (2012, p. 105) report resear...
... middle of paper ...
...-based approach. Business Horizons 55: 105-111.
Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 110: 23-35.
Ligon, G.S., Graham, K.A., Edwards, A., Osburn, H.K., & Hunter, S.T. (2012). Performance Management: Appraising Performance, Providing Feedback, and Developing for Creativity. Handbook of Organizational Creativity 633-666. New York: Elsevier, INC.
Oettingen, G., Marquardt, M.K., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2012). Mental contrasting turns positive feedback on creative potential into successful performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48: 990-996.
Renn, R.W. (2003). Moderation by goal commitment of the feedback-performance relationship: Theoretical explanation and preliminary study. Human Resource Management Review 13: 561-580.
Feedback is an excellent tool to provide employees with information and guidance. Feedback consists of two-way communication. Employee feedback provides managers with clues regarding how they are hindering or aiding their subordinates ' work performance. Supervisory feedback should inform, enlighten, and suggest improvements to employees regarding their performance. Feedback increases self-awareness. Proverbs 19:20 states “Hear counsel, receive instruction, and accept correction, that you may be wise in the time to come.” If presented correctly, feedback is not positive or negative. It is just data to make someone aware of the impact of his/her skills and behaviors on
...he company which suggests that if you examine managerial styles and work to improve employee satisfaction there will be a correlational increase in productivity and retention. It suggests that perhaps people leave companies not because they are unsatisfied with their work or pay, but rather, because they are unsatisfied with their manager. While this idea might seem brash, it is a significant point being made that suggests that in order to see improvement you need to revamp a program or company from the top. Having worked as both an entry level worker and a managerial supervisor, I can testify to the importance of manager support, appreciation, and feedback and how this impacts your role in the company. Seeking out the strengths in employees, though it seems so obvious in theory, is a revolutionary way to transform the work environment and employee morale.
A suggestion made by Schon (1991) states that there are two fundamental forms of reflection: reflection-on-action and reflection-in-action. He further defined Reflection-in-action as a means of examining one’s own behaviour and that of others while in a situation (Schon, 1995, 1987). However, Grant and Greene (2001) and Revans (1998), defined reflection-on-action as focusing on identifying negative aspects of personal behaviour with a view to improving professional comp...
In addition to feedback, goals have been found to be more effective when they are tied to employee evaluations. The results of employee evaluations typically carry great weight when it comes to raises, bonuses, and potential advancement. Tying these types of rewards to successful goal completion also improves performance and increases goal commitment among employees (House, 1971). Incorporating deadlines to specific goals is also attributed to elevated performance levels. The motivation levels of the employee increase to meet goals within set deadlines and receive positive feedback (Lunenburg, 2011). As organizations focus on employee satisfaction and motivation, goal setting will remain an important aspect of management practices. In today’s economy, organizations are competing for top talent and ensuring employee satisfaction among job tasks is an important piece of talent retention.
There is an array of key components and factors involved in making an organization a successful business. One of those elements consists on evaluating employee’s performance; this sole component is critical in determining how effective is the organization’s productivity and which are the necessary steps to ensure proper functioning. “The performance appraisal may be one of the few times during the year where an employee and the reviewer, typically the employee's supervisor, can sit down and have a lengthy face-to-face discussion about all aspects of the job” (Joseph, 2016). Employees’ performance assessment serves as an instrument to gather important information as to which areas of the job description are being performed according to standards
Low and medium level performers improved and high performers reduced over time. It is due to supervisors who received evaluation were no more likely to improve performance than managers who did not receive feedback; people who gave themselves higher self-rating than the ratings their subordi...
The 360-degree feedback or multi sources feedback is assessment, which comes from other employees. This feedback contains direct and indirect information from managers, colleagues, subordinates as well as self-evaluation data. Also, it includes other external sources such as customers and suppliers reports. The 360-degree feedback plays a significant role to help workers develop their performance. Human resources professionals are increasingly using this assessment. The main propose of the 360 feedback is to encourage employees to seek out information about their performance, skills and working relations. The origin of 360-feedback came from the German military during World War II. They started using multiple sources in order to evaluate officer’s performance (Thornton, 2014). In this paper, I am going to explore some key principles and actions that can help a manager increase their 360-degree feedback ratings. The paper will identify manager perspective of job performance, environmental factors influencing employee review of managers, and perspective of customers and suppliers satisfaction. Also, actions will be suggested for affective applications of the principles.
In today's complex business environment; traditional approaches like monetary incentives are not the only prime motivators. In addition to expecting financial incentives for their performance, employee's expectations are much more. Appreciation, recognition and opportunities for personal growth; must be catered for to harness maximum productivity. Furthermore in an era where change is imperative for the organisation's survival, highly motivated employees, represent flexibility and show willing to change; a vital component for the success of any organisation.
Daniels, A. C. (2004). Performance management: changing behavior that drives organizational effectiveness (4th ed.). Atlanta, GA: Performance Management Publications.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
Reward systems in the work place are not a new idea in the workplace, but they are the key to having happy employees and happy employees mean better output. Reward systems are systems used by companies where employees who achieve particular results are paid more or get other advantages. Some employers offer pay as incentives, while others offer benefits, some use a combination of both types. Employees within a company want recognition for the time and effort that they have put into a task required of their job. The use of reward systems not only enhances the company but it gives the employee a feeling of personal connection and investment into the company. Building a reward system can be a great asset to the company, by allowing the employees to feel that they are a part of the company. Reward systems are an important tool and key concept to managing an organization effectively.
Current Directions in Psychological Science 15.5 (2006): 265-68. Print. The.
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
Organization is a group of people brought to gather to achieve specific goals. Goals can be achieved if team member are performing well. Performance is the results of activities given to the employees in an organization to be achieved within specific period of time. Evaluating the current performance of employees against past performances and organizational standards is known as Performance Appraisal (Dessler, 2005). Furthermore performance appraisal helps the company know how individual employees are performing and how to improve their performance thus improving the performance of the company (Grubb, 2007). A performance appraisal is propose in which the performance management system in an organizations set work goals, determine performance standards, provide performance feedback, determine training and development needs and distribute rewards as well as evaluating an employee’s job performance during a period of time. The performance of team member is much more than appraising individuals’ works, it is managing the business, so the performance of an employee is influences by the performance of an organization. It is target to achieve the best results for the planned strategic by managing activities of employees. There are many different opinions on the performance appraisals, some organizations do performance appraisals without any aim just follow others., where some organizations do performance appraisals to make sure they have a record of a piece of paper in the employee’s file – they are careless about do corrective action. But successful organizations understand the importance of combining performance appraisals into their performance management process and strategy plan as the success of any organizatio...
Performance management is a continuous process that creates a working culture to encourage employees to improve their work performance and reach their full potential during their stay of employment. Performance Management also provides strategic direction, develop competency in employees and instill organization value. This paper will identify methods and affects that performance management plan has on the organization and their employees.